Sarovic Darko
Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:767075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.767075. eCollection 2021.
This paper presents a unifying theory for autism by applying the framework of a pathogenetic triad to the scientific literature. It proposes a deconstruction of autism into three contributing features (an autistic personality dimension, cognitive compensation, and neuropathological risk factors), and delineates how they interact to cause a maladaptive behavioral phenotype that may require a clinical diagnosis. The autistic personality represents a common core condition, which induces a set of behavioral issues when pronounced. These issues are compensated for by cognitive mechanisms, allowing the individual to remain adaptive and functional. Risk factors, both exogenous and endogenous ones, show pathophysiological convergence through their negative effects on neurodevelopment. This secondarily affects cognitive compensation, which disinhibits a maladaptive behavioral phenotype. The triad is operationalized and methods for quantification are presented. With respect to the breadth of findings in the literature that it can incorporate, it is the most comprehensive model yet for autism. Its main implications are that (1) it presents the broader autism phenotype as a non-pathological core personality domain, which is shared across the population and uncoupled from associated features such as low cognitive ability and immune dysfunction, (2) it proposes that common genetic variants underly the personality domain, and that rare variants act as risk factors through negative effects on neurodevelopment, (3) it outlines a common pathophysiological mechanism, through inhibition of neurodevelopment and cognitive dysfunction, by which a wide range of endogenous and exogenous risk factors lead to autism, and (4) it suggests that contributing risk factors, and findings of immune and autonomic dysfunction are clinically ascertained rather than part of the core autism construct.
本文通过将发病三联征框架应用于科学文献,提出了一种统一的自闭症理论。它将自闭症解构为三个促成特征(自闭症人格维度、认知补偿和神经病理风险因素),并描述了它们如何相互作用以导致一种可能需要临床诊断的适应不良行为表型。自闭症人格代表一种常见的核心状况,当其显著时会引发一系列行为问题。这些问题通过认知机制得到补偿,使个体能够保持适应性和功能性。风险因素,包括外源性和内源性因素,通过对神经发育的负面影响显示出病理生理趋同。这继而影响认知补偿,从而解除对适应不良行为表型的抑制。文中对三联征进行了操作化定义并提出了量化方法。就其能够纳入的文献研究广度而言,它是迄今为止最全面的自闭症模型。其主要意义在于:(1)它将更广泛的自闭症表型呈现为一个非病理性的核心人格领域,该领域在人群中普遍存在,且与低认知能力和免疫功能障碍等相关特征无关;(2)它提出常见基因变异构成人格领域的基础,而罕见变异通过对神经发育的负面影响充当风险因素;(3)它概述了一种常见的病理生理机制,即通过抑制神经发育和认知功能障碍,多种内源性和外源性风险因素导致自闭症;(4)它表明促成风险因素以及免疫和自主神经功能障碍的研究结果是临床确定的,而非核心自闭症结构的一部分。