Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Rome, Italy.
Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 16;12:755304. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.755304. eCollection 2021.
Remarkable progress has been made in the field of anti-tumor immunity, nevertheless many questions are still open. Thus, even though memory T cells have been implicated in long-term anti-tumor protection, particularly in prevention of cancer recurrence, the bases of their variable effectiveness in tumor patients are poorly understood. Two types of memory T cells have been described according to their traffic pathways: recirculating and tissue-resident memory T cells. Recirculating tumor-specific memory T cells are found in the cell infiltrate of solid tumors, in the lymph and in the peripheral blood, and they constantly migrate in and out of lymph nodes, spleen, and bone marrow. Tissue-resident tumor-specific memory T cells (TRM) permanently reside in the tumor, providing local protection. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1, a type of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy, can considerably re-invigorate T cell response and lead to successful tumor control, even in patients at advanced stages. Indeed, ICB has led to unprecedented successes against many types of cancers, starting a ground-breaking revolution in tumor therapy. Unfortunately, not all patients are responsive to such treatment, thus further improvements are urgently needed. The mechanisms underlying resistance to ICB are still largely unknown. A better knowledge of the dynamics of the immune response driven by the two types of memory T cells before and after anti-PD-1/PD-L1 would provide important insights on the variability of the outcomes. This would be instrumental to design new treatments to overcome resistance. Here we provide an overview of T cell contribution to immunity against solid tumors, focusing on memory T cells. We summarize recent evidence on the involvement of recirculating memory T cells and TRM in anti-PD-1/PD-L1-elicited antitumor immunity, outline the open questions in the field, and propose that a synergic action of the two types of memory T cells is required to achieve a full response. We argue that a T-centric vision focused on the specific roles and the possible interplay between TRM and recirculating memory T cells will lead to a better understanding of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mechanism of action, and provide new tools for improving ICB therapeutic strategy.
抗肿瘤免疫领域取得了显著进展,但仍有许多问题悬而未决。因此,尽管记忆 T 细胞已被认为与长期抗肿瘤保护有关,尤其是在预防癌症复发方面,但肿瘤患者中其有效性差异的基础仍知之甚少。根据其迁移途径,已描述了两种类型的记忆 T 细胞:循环和组织驻留记忆 T 细胞。循环肿瘤特异性记忆 T 细胞存在于实体瘤的细胞浸润中、淋巴和外周血中,它们不断在淋巴结、脾脏和骨髓中进出。组织驻留的肿瘤特异性记忆 T 细胞(TRM)永久驻留在肿瘤中,提供局部保护。抗 PD-1/PD-L1,一种免疫检查点阻断(ICB)治疗,可极大地增强 T 细胞反应并导致成功的肿瘤控制,即使在晚期患者中也是如此。事实上,ICB 已在对抗多种类型的癌症方面取得了前所未有的成功,开创了肿瘤治疗的革命性突破。不幸的是,并非所有患者都对这种治疗有反应,因此迫切需要进一步改进。对 ICB 耐药的机制仍在很大程度上未知。更好地了解抗 PD-1/PD-L1 前后两种类型的记忆 T 细胞驱动的免疫反应的动态,将为了解结果的可变性提供重要的见解。这对于设计克服耐药性的新治疗方法至关重要。在这里,我们概述了 T 细胞对抗实体瘤免疫的贡献,重点介绍了记忆 T 细胞。我们总结了最近关于循环记忆 T 细胞和 TRM 参与抗 PD-1/PD-L1 引发的抗肿瘤免疫的证据,概述了该领域的开放性问题,并提出需要两种类型的记忆 T 细胞的协同作用来实现完全反应。我们认为,以 T 细胞为中心的视角,侧重于 TRM 和循环记忆 T 细胞的特定作用及其可能的相互作用,将有助于更好地理解抗 PD-1/PD-L1 的作用机制,并为改善 ICB 治疗策略提供新的工具。