Kos Nikola, Zeljković Ivan, Krčmar Tomislav, Golubić Karlo, Šaler Fran, Erceg Marijan, Delić-Brkljačić Diana, Bulj Nikola
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Sestre Milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Cardiol Res Pract. 2021 Nov 24;2021:6647626. doi: 10.1155/2021/6647626. eCollection 2021.
The survey's aim was to examine the significance of infarct-related artery (IRA) occlusion (verified angiographically) on very long-term outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction, within the STEMI and NSTEMI diagnosis.
A single-center, nonrandomized, registry-based study on patients treated for acute coronary syndrome with percutaneous coronary intervention between June 2011 and December 2016 was conducted. Patients with angiographically proven IRA occlusion (100% stenosis with TIMI flow 0 distal to occlusion) were categorized as occlusive myocardial infarction (OMI) and patients with patent IRA (50-99% stenosis with TIMI 1-3 flow) were categorized as nonocclusive myocardial infarction (NOMI) and very long-term outcomes were analyzed. Data were collected prospectively from the hospital's PCI registry and the database of the Croatian Institute of Public Health.
A total of 2450 patients were included in the study. 796 (32.5%) patients had NOMI and 1654 patients (67.5%) had OMI. According to ECG changes, 1534 patients presented with STEMI (62,6%) and 916 with NSTEMI (37,8%). 88% of STEMI patients presented with OMI and 12% with NOMI, while patients with NSTEMI in 33,8% presented with OMI and in 66,81% with NOMI. A median follow-up was 4.7 years. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality between the groups (14.8% vs 13.1%; OMI vs NOMI, respectively; =0.374) neither in all-cause mortality (19% vs 21.5%; OMI vs NOMI, respectively; =0.374). Patients with NSTEMI had a significantly higher very long-term mortality (21.6% vs 18.1%; NSTEMI vs STEMI, respectively; =0.029).
The main findings of the study are as follows: (1) total IRA occlusion was not associated with higher long-term mortality; (2) NSTEMI was associated with a higher mortality rate compared with STEMI, independent of angiographic presentation (OMI/NOMI); (3) IRA occlusion was not associated with significantly higher mortality rates in patients with STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively.
本研究旨在探讨梗死相关动脉(IRA)闭塞(经血管造影证实)对急性心肌梗死患者(STEMI和NSTEMI诊断范围内)的长期预后的意义。
对2011年6月至2016年12月期间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行了一项单中心、非随机、基于注册登记的研究。血管造影证实IRA闭塞(闭塞远端TIMI血流0级,狭窄100%)的患者被归类为闭塞性心肌梗死(OMI),IRA通畅(TIMI血流1 - 3级,狭窄50 - 99%)的患者被归类为非闭塞性心肌梗死(NOMI),并分析其长期预后。数据前瞻性地收集于医院的PCI注册登记和克罗地亚公共卫生研究所的数据库。
本研究共纳入2450例患者。796例(32.5%)患者为NOMI,1654例(67.5%)患者为OMI。根据心电图变化,1534例患者表现为STEMI(62.6%),916例表现为NSTEMI(37.8%)。88%的STEMI患者为OMI,12%为NOMI,而NSTEMI患者中33.8%为OMI,66.81%为NOMI。中位随访时间为4.7年。两组间心血管死亡率(分别为14.8%对13.1%;OMI对NOMI;P = 0.374)和全因死亡率(分别为19%对21.5%;OMI对NOMI;P = 0.374)均无显著差异。NSTEMI患者的长期死亡率显著更高(分别为21.6%对18.1%;NSTEMI对STEMI;P = 0.029)。
本研究的主要发现如下:(1)IRA完全闭塞与较高长期死亡率无关;(2)与STEMI相比,NSTEMI与更高的死亡率相关,与血管造影表现(OMI/NOMI)无关;(3)IRA闭塞分别与STEMI和NSTEMI患者的死亡率显著升高无关。