Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Center for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CeBiB), University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Department of Biology, Faculty of Chemistry and Biology, University of Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 16;9:654410. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.654410. eCollection 2021.
This is the first pilot study on alternative conceptions and obstacles pertaining to pneumonia in adolescents of different school vulnerability indexes. Countries with low socioeconomic levels are disproportionately affected, with Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) being the second-most affected area in the world, after sub-Saharan Africa. In spite of this fact, pneumonia is not included as an important component within the contents of the microbiology curriculum unit in the natural science school program. Therefore, we wanted to study how students knew about this topic by putting One Health into action by building and validating qualitative and quantitative questionnaires, put together by different experts in pedagogy, didactics, microbiology, and veterinary to find out what students knew about pneumonia and their misconceptions about it. A total of 148 students (in 8th and 9th grade) participated in this survey. The results reveal that no statistically significant differences between the different scholar grades ( = 0.3360 Pearson chi2) or genders ( = 0.8000 Fisher's exact test) presented higher or lower School Vulnerability Index (SVI). Regardless of the social stratum or the level of vulnerability of the students, they have heard about this disease primarily through their family/relatives, maintaining a superficial notion of the disease, learning wrong ideas about microorganisms and treatments that can contribute to the risk to public health.
这是第一项关于不同学校脆弱性指数青少年肺炎相关误解和障碍的初步研究。社会经济水平较低的国家受到的影响不成比例,拉丁美洲和加勒比地区(LAC)是继撒哈拉以南非洲之后受影响第二大的地区。尽管如此,肺炎并未被纳入自然科学学校课程微生物学课程单元的重要内容。因此,我们希望通过实施“同一健康”来研究学生们对此主题的了解程度,方法是通过不同教育、教学、微生物学和兽医专家共同制定和验证定性和定量问卷,以了解学生对肺炎的了解程度及其对肺炎的误解。共有 148 名学生(8 至 9 年级)参与了这项调查。结果表明,不同学者年级(= 0.3360 Pearson chi2)或性别(= 0.8000 Fisher 确切检验)之间没有统计学上的显著差异表现出更高或更低的学校脆弱性指数(SVI)。无论学生的社会阶层或脆弱性水平如何,他们主要通过家人/亲戚了解这种疾病,对这种疾病只有肤浅的认识,对微生物和治疗方法有错误的认识,这可能会对公众健康造成风险。