• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国企业食品欺诈:社会共治视角下的关键因素识别。

Enterprise Food Fraud in China: Key Factors Identification From Social Co-governance Perspective.

机构信息

School of Economics, Anyang Normal University, Anyang, China.

School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;9:752112. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.752112. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.752112
PMID:34869168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8639508/
Abstract

Food fraud not only exacerbates human public health risks but also threatens the business development of food and related industries. Therefore, how to curb food fraud effectively becomes a crucial issue for governments, industries, and consumers. Previous studies have demonstrated that enterprise food fraud is subject to joint influences of factor at various hierarchical levels within a complex system of stakeholders. To address enterprise food fraud, it is necessary to identify the key such factors and elucidate the functional mechanisms, as well as systematic analysis of the interrelationships among clusters and factors. Hence, we grounded on a social co-governance perspective and investigated the food fraud key influencing factors and their interrelationships in an emerging food market - China, by using the DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP). Results showed that the identified key cluster was government regulation, social governance, and detection techniques. Four other key factors were also identified, including government regulatory capability and penalty intensity, expected economic benefits, maturity of market reputation mechanism, and transparency of supply chain. Policy implications from the social co-governance perspective for China and similar economies are discussed finally.

摘要

食品欺诈不仅加剧了人类公共健康风险,还威胁着食品及相关行业的业务发展。因此,如何有效遏制食品欺诈已成为政府、行业和消费者的关键问题。以往研究表明,企业食品欺诈受到利益相关者复杂系统中各层次因素的共同影响。为了解决企业食品欺诈问题,有必要确定关键因素并阐明功能机制,以及对集群和因素之间的相互关系进行系统分析。因此,我们基于社会共治视角,运用基于 DEMATEL 的分析网络过程(DANP),研究了新兴食品市场——中国的食品欺诈关键影响因素及其相互关系。结果表明,确定的关键集群是政府监管、社会治理和检测技术。还确定了另外四个关键因素,包括政府监管能力和处罚力度、预期经济效益、市场声誉机制成熟度和供应链透明度。最后,从社会共治的角度探讨了对中国和类似经济体的政策意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ac/8639508/d1c7eb5196d3/fpubh-09-752112-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ac/8639508/d1c7eb5196d3/fpubh-09-752112-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08ac/8639508/d1c7eb5196d3/fpubh-09-752112-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Enterprise Food Fraud in China: Key Factors Identification From Social Co-governance Perspective.中国企业食品欺诈:社会共治视角下的关键因素识别。
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;9:752112. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.752112. eCollection 2021.
2
Prevention of food fraud and fraud emulation among companies in the supply chain based on a social Co-governance framework.基于社会共同治理框架预防供应链中各公司之间的食品欺诈及欺诈模仿行为。
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 29;10(9):e30340. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30340. eCollection 2024 May 15.
3
Public-Public Collaboration for Food Safety Risk Management: Essence, Modes, and Identification of Key Influencing Factors Using DANP.食品安全风险管理中的公私合作:本质、模式及基于决策实验室分析法的关键影响因素识别
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 13;10:944090. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.944090. eCollection 2022.
4
Developing a strategy map for forensic accounting with fraud risk management: An integrated balanced scorecard-based decision model.开发一个与舞弊风险管理相结合的法务会计策略图:一个基于综合平衡计分卡的决策模型。
Eval Program Plann. 2020 Jun;80:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101780. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
5
Food fraud and the perceived integrity of European food imports into China.食品掺假与欧洲输华食品的可信度感知
PLoS One. 2018 May 23;13(5):e0195817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195817. eCollection 2018.
6
Food manufacturer willingness to employ blockchain technology system under the social Co-governance framework: China's situation.社会共同治理框架下食品制造商采用区块链技术系统的意愿:中国的情况
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Oct 18;7:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100619. eCollection 2023.
7
Safe Food Supply Chain as Health Network: An Evolutionary Game Analysis of Behavior Strategy for Quality Investment.安全食品供应链作为健康网络:质量投资行为策略的演化博弈分析。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241244728. doi: 10.1177/00469580241244728.
8
Study on the Influences of Inter-Governmental Information Flow and Interdepartmental Collaborative Supervision on Pork Quality: A Case Study in China.政府间信息流与部门间协同监管对猪肉质量的影响研究:以中国为例
Foods. 2024 Jul 28;13(15):2387. doi: 10.3390/foods13152387.
9
A study on the influencing factors and related paths of farmer's participation in food safety governance-based on DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC model.基于 DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC 模型的农民参与食品安全治理影响因素及作用路径研究
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 14;13(1):11372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38585-w.
10
Food Fraud Prevention: Policy, Strategy, and Decision-Making - Implementation Steps for a Government Agency or Industry.食品欺诈预防:政策、策略与决策——政府机构或行业的实施步骤
Chimia (Aarau). 2016;70(5):320-8. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2016.320.

引用本文的文献

1
A Holistic Approach for Ethics and Sustainability in the Food Chain: The Gateway to Oral and Systemic Health.食物链中伦理与可持续性的整体方法:通往口腔与全身健康之路。
Foods. 2024 Apr 17;13(8):1224. doi: 10.3390/foods13081224.
2
Food manufacturer willingness to employ blockchain technology system under the social Co-governance framework: China's situation.社会共同治理框架下食品制造商采用区块链技术系统的意愿:中国的情况
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Oct 18;7:100619. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100619. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Does prior knowledge of food fraud affect consumer behavior? Evidence from an incentivized economic experiment.消费者对食品欺诈的了解是否会影响其消费行为?一项基于激励性经济实验的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 3;14(12):e0225113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225113. eCollection 2019.
2
Food Fraud Prevention: Policy, Strategy, and Decision-Making - Implementation Steps for a Government Agency or Industry.食品欺诈预防:政策、策略与决策——政府机构或行业的实施步骤
Chimia (Aarau). 2016;70(5):320-8. doi: 10.2533/chimia.2016.320.
3
Food Safety, Food Fraud, and Food Defense: A Fast Evolving Literature.
食品安全、食品欺诈与食品防护:快速发展的文献
J Food Sci. 2016 Apr;81(4):R823-34. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13256. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
4
Identifying critical factors influencing the disposal of dead pigs by farmers in China.识别影响中国农户死猪处理的关键因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jan;23(1):661-72. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5284-y. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
5
Economically motivated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents.经济驱动的食品掺假(EMA):EMA 事件的共同特征。
J Food Prot. 2013 Apr;76(4):723-35. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399.
6
Development and application of a database of food ingredient fraud and economically motivated adulteration from 1980 to 2010.从 1980 年到 2010 年食品成分欺诈和经济动机掺假数据库的开发和应用。
J Food Sci. 2012 Apr;77(4):R118-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02657.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Defining the public health threat of food fraud.定义食品欺诈对公共健康的威胁。
J Food Sci. 2011 Nov-Dec;76(9):R157-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x.