Suppr超能文献

卫生专业人员能力框架制定中的利益相关者参与:一项系统综述

Stakeholder Engagement in Competency Framework Development in Health Professions: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Lepre Breanna, Palermo Claire, Mansfield Kylie J, Beck Eleanor J

机构信息

School of Medicine, Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.

Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 12;8:759848. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.759848. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Competency framework development in health professions has downstream implications for all relevant stakeholders, from the professionals themselves, to organisations, and most importantly end users of services. However, there is little guidance related to what stakeholders might be involved in the competency development process, and when. This review aimed to systematically review literature related to competency framework development methodology in health, to identify the breadth and purpose of key stakeholders commonly involved in the process. Studies were identified using five electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, and ERIC) and a search of websites of organisations involved in curriculum or regulation using keywords related to competency frameworks. The total yield from all databases was 10,625 results, with 73 articles included in the final review. Most articles were from Australia (30%) and were conducted in the nursing (34%) profession. Unsurprisingly, practitioners (86%) and academics (75%) were typically engaged as stakeholders in competency framework development. While many competency frameworks were described as patient-focused, only 14 (19%) studies elected to include service users as stakeholders. Similarly, despite the multi-disciplinary focus described in some frameworks, only nine (12%) studies involved practitioners from other professions. Limiting the conceptualisation of competence to that determined by members of the profession itself may not provide the depth of insight required to capture the complexity of healthcare and address the needs of important stakeholder groups. Future methodology should attempt to engage a variety of relevant stakeholders such as external health professions and the community to match professional education to health service demands. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=128350.

摘要

卫生专业领域的能力框架开发对所有相关利益相关者都有下游影响,从专业人员自身到组织,最重要的是服务的最终用户。然而,关于哪些利益相关者可能参与能力开发过程以及何时参与,几乎没有相关指导。本综述旨在系统回顾与卫生领域能力框架开发方法相关的文献,以确定该过程中通常涉及的关键利益相关者的范围和目的。通过五个电子数据库(MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、EMBASE和ERIC)以及使用与能力框架相关的关键词搜索参与课程或监管的组织网站来识别研究。所有数据库的总结果为10625条,最终综述纳入了73篇文章。大多数文章来自澳大利亚(30%),且是关于护理专业(34%)的。不出所料,从业者(86%)和学者(75%)通常作为利益相关者参与能力框架开发。虽然许多能力框架被描述为以患者为中心,但只有14项(19%)研究选择将服务用户纳入利益相关者。同样,尽管一些框架描述了多学科重点,但只有9项(12%)研究涉及其他专业的从业者。将能力的概念化局限于由专业人员自身确定的范围,可能无法提供洞察医疗保健复杂性和满足重要利益相关者群体需求所需的深度见解。未来的方法应尝试让各种相关利益相关者参与,如外部卫生专业人员和社区,以使专业教育与卫生服务需求相匹配。https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=128350

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/208a/8632936/6ad0f100da5e/fmed-08-759848-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验