• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦(2000 - 2019年)和以色列(2011 - 2019年)的无创产前筛查与侵入性检测趋势

Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000-2019) and Israel (2011-2019).

作者信息

Sagi-Dain Lena, Singer Amihood, Petersen Olav B, Lou Stina, Vogel Ida

机构信息

Prenatal Genetics, Genetics Institute, Carmel Medical Center, Affiliated to the Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

Community Genetics, Public Health Services, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;8:768997. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.768997. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2021.768997
PMID:34869484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8635699/
Abstract

Following the wide distribution of non-invasive prenatal genetic screening (NIPS), numerous studies have reported a decline in total invasive tests in the recent years, up to 50-70% in some countries. However, in Denmark and Israel we have not experienced these declines. The objective of our study was to evaluate the trends in NIPS and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) use in Denmark and Israel. This retrospective study was performed by data acquisition from the Danish Cytogenetics Central Registry throughout the years 2000-2019, and Israeli Public Health Services, Ministry of Health computerized database (from 2011). Of the 1,243,956 live births registered in Denmark over the years 2000-2019, a relatively steady level of invasive testing around 6% was noted since 2004, as opposed to 13.0% in Israel based on 1,594,962 live births between 2011 and 2019. The average uptake of NIPS was 1.1 ± 0.5% in Denmark vs. 4.3% in Israel (2013-2019). Relatively steady rates of invasive testing were noted in both countries, compared to a slight decline in NIPS in the recent years. The recent decrease in the rates of invasive testing in the NIPS era was not observed in Denmark or in Israel. These results imply that Danish and Israeli women and/or health providers might favor the high resolution and yield of CMA testing over the non-invasiveness of NIPS. We explore and discuss this phenomenon, based on five central factors.

摘要

随着无创产前基因检测(NIPS)的广泛应用,众多研究报告称近年来侵入性检测的总数有所下降,在一些国家下降幅度高达50%-70%。然而,在丹麦和以色列,我们并未经历这种下降。我们研究的目的是评估丹麦和以色列NIPS及染色体微阵列分析(CMA)的使用趋势。这项回顾性研究通过从丹麦细胞遗传学中央登记处获取2000年至2019年全年的数据,以及从以色列公共卫生服务部、卫生部计算机数据库(2011年起)获取数据来进行。在2000年至2019年丹麦登记的1,243,956例活产中,自2004年以来侵入性检测水平相对稳定在6%左右,而基于2011年至2019年期间1,594,962例活产数据,以色列的这一比例为13.0%。丹麦NIPS的平均使用率为1.1±0.5%,而以色列(2013 - 2019年)为4.3%。与近年来NIPS略有下降相比,两国的侵入性检测率相对稳定。在丹麦或以色列未观察到NIPS时代侵入性检测率的近期下降。这些结果表明,丹麦和以色列的女性和/或医疗服务提供者可能更青睐CMA检测的高分辨率和高检出率,而非NIPS的非侵入性。我们基于五个核心因素对这一现象进行探讨。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/c04a9a743ed0/fmed-08-768997-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/6a6b29991efa/fmed-08-768997-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/b3b0bcbd2658/fmed-08-768997-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/c04a9a743ed0/fmed-08-768997-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/6a6b29991efa/fmed-08-768997-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/b3b0bcbd2658/fmed-08-768997-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d933/8635699/c04a9a743ed0/fmed-08-768997-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in Non-invasive Prenatal Screening and Invasive Testing in Denmark (2000-2019) and Israel (2011-2019).丹麦(2000 - 2019年)和以色列(2011 - 2019年)的无创产前筛查与侵入性检测趋势
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 17;8:768997. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.768997. eCollection 2021.
2
National data on the early clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing in public and private healthcare in Denmark 2013-2017.丹麦 2013-2017 年公共和私人医疗保健中无创性产前检测的早期临床应用的国家数据。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):884-892. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14052. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
3
A call for public funding of invasive and non-invasive prenatal testing.呼吁对侵入性和非侵入性产前检测进行公共资金投入。
J Perinat Med. 2023 May 22;51(8):992-996. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0014. Print 2023 Oct 26.
4
Attitudes of Israeli parents of children with Down syndrome toward non-invasive prenatal screening and the scope of prenatal testing.患有唐氏综合征儿童的以色列父母对无创产前筛查的态度及产前检测范围
J Genet Couns. 2019 Dec;28(6):1119-1129. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1162. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
5
Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis.无创产前筛查失败患者的随访:关于进一步产前诊断选择的思考
Front Genet. 2021 May 19;12:666648. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.666648. eCollection 2021.
6
Population-based trends in invasive prenatal diagnosis for ultrasound-based indications: two decades of change from 1994 to 2016.基于人群的超声指征下侵袭性产前诊断的趋势:1994 年至 2016 年二十年的变化。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;53(4):503-511. doi: 10.1002/uog.19107.
7
National screening guidelines and developments in prenatal diagnoses and live births of Down syndrome in 1973-2016 in Denmark.1973-2016 年丹麦全国性筛查指南及唐氏综合征产前诊断和活产儿的变化。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Feb;97(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13273.
8
Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for translocation carriers-YES please or NO go?非侵入性产前诊断对易位携带者——行还是不行?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Nov;100(11):2036-2043. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14256. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
9
[The value of noninvasive prenatal screening for the detection of fetal chromosome 16 aneuploidy].[无创产前筛查在检测胎儿16号染色体非整倍体中的价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 10;37(2):135-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9406.2020.02.008.
10
Clinical evaluation of NIPS for women at advanced maternal age: a multicenter retrospective study.高龄孕产妇无创产前筛查(NIPS)的临床评估:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Dec;32(24):4080-4085. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1481385. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased nuchal translucency thickness and normal chromosomal microarray: Danish nationwide cohort study.颈项透明层厚度增加与染色体微阵列正常:丹麦全国队列研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Apr;65(4):462-469. doi: 10.1002/uog.29198. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
2
Outcomes associated with fetal nuchal translucency between 3.0 and 3.4 mm in the first trimester.孕早期胎儿颈部透明带厚度在3.0至3.4毫米之间的相关结局。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):629-636. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15055. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Advancements of non-invasive prenatal testing: the role of obstetricians.

本文引用的文献

1
National data on the early clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing in public and private healthcare in Denmark 2013-2017.丹麦 2013-2017 年公共和私人医疗保健中无创性产前检测的早期临床应用的国家数据。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 May;100(5):884-892. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14052. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
2
Impact of a national genetic carrier-screening program for reproductive purposes.国家生殖目的遗传携带者筛查计划的影响。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):802-808. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13858. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
Current use of noninvasive prenatal testing in Europe, Australia and the USA: A graphical presentation.
无创产前检测的进展:产科医生的作用。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 13;11:1388481. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1388481. eCollection 2024.
4
The implementation and impact of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for Down's syndrome into antenatal screening programmes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)在唐氏综合征产前筛查项目中的实施和影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 16;19(5):e0298643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298643. eCollection 2024.
5
Understanding knowledge, perception, and willingness of non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: a survey among Chinese high-risk pregnant women.了解中国高危孕妇对胎儿非整倍体无创产前检测的认知、看法及意愿:一项调查
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 16;10:1232942. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1232942. eCollection 2023.
6
Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): Reliability, Challenges, and Future Directions.无创产前检测(NIPT):可靠性、挑战与未来方向。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 2;13(15):2570. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152570.
当前在欧洲、澳大利亚和美国使用的非侵入性产前检测:图形展示。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):722-730. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13841. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Chromosomal microarray vs. NIPS: analysis of 5541 low-risk pregnancies.染色体微阵列与 NIPS:5541 例低风险妊娠分析。
Genet Med. 2019 Nov;21(11):2462-2467. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0550-x. Epub 2019 May 24.
5
The epidemic of abnormal copy number variant cases missed because of reliance upon noninvasive prenatal screening.由于依赖于无创产前筛查而错过的异常拷贝数变异病例的流行。
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Sep;38(10):730-734. doi: 10.1002/pd.5275.
6
The price of abandoning diagnostic testing for cell-free fetal DNA screening.放弃无细胞胎儿DNA筛查诊断检测的代价。
Prenat Diagn. 2018 Mar;38(4):243-245. doi: 10.1002/pd.5226. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
National screening guidelines and developments in prenatal diagnoses and live births of Down syndrome in 1973-2016 in Denmark.1973-2016 年丹麦全国性筛查指南及唐氏综合征产前诊断和活产儿的变化。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Feb;97(2):195-203. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13273.
8
Women's Experience with Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing and Emotional Well-being and Satisfaction after Test-Results.女性进行无创产前检测的经历以及检测结果后的情绪健康和满意度。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1348-1356. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0118-3. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
Chromosomal microarray as primary diagnostic genomic tool for pregnancies at increased risk within a population-based combined first-trimester screening program.在基于人群的联合早孕期筛查计划中,对于高危妊娠,染色体微阵列作为主要的诊断性基因组工具。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):480-486. doi: 10.1002/uog.17548. Epub 2018 Mar 4.
10
Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis.亚显微染色体异常在无结构染色体异常高风险妊娠中的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):445-452. doi: 10.1002/uog.17533.