• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低位直肠癌传统和经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术后的MRI表现

Postoperative MRI Findings Following Conventional and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision in Low Rectal Cancer.

作者信息

Oerskov Kim Morgenstjerne, Bondeven Peter, Laurberg Søren, Hagemann-Madsen Rikke H, Christensen Henrik Kidmose, Lauridsen Henrik, Pedersen Bodil Ginnerup

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Surgery, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2021 Nov 16;8:771107. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.771107. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.771107
PMID:34869567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8635027/
Abstract

The disparity in outcomes for low rectal cancer may reflect differences in operative approach and quality. The extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) was developed to reduce margin involvement in low rectal cancers by widening the excision of the conventional abdominoperineal excision (c-APE) to include the posterior pelvic diaphragm. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and localization of inadvertent residual pelvic diaphragm on postoperative MRI after intended ELAPE and c-APE. A total of 147 patients treated with c-APE or ELAPE for rectal cancer were included. Postoperative MRI was performed on 51% of the cohort ( = 75) and evaluated with regard to the residual pelvic diaphragm by a radiologist trained in pelvic MRI. Patient records, histopathological reports, and standardized photographs were assessed. Pathology and MRI findings were evaluated independently in a blinded fashion. Additionally, preoperative MRIs were evaluated for possible risk factors for margin involvement. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected residual pelvic diaphragm was identified in 45 (75.4%) of 61 patients who underwent ELAPE and in 14 (100%) of 14 patients who underwent c-APE. An increased risk of margin involvement was observed in anteriorly oriented tumors with 16 (22%) of 73 anteriorly oriented tumors presenting with margin involvement vs. 7 (9%) of 74 non-anteriorly oriented tumors ( = 0.038). Residual pelvic diaphragm following abdominoperineal excision can be depicted by postoperative MRI. Inadvertent residual pelvic diaphragm (RPD) was commonly found in the series of patients treated with the ELAPE technique. Anterior tumor orientation was a risk factor for circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement regardless of surgical approach.

摘要

低位直肠癌治疗结果的差异可能反映了手术方式和质量的不同。经腹会阴联合外括约肌切除(ELAPE)术的研发目的是通过扩大传统经腹会阴联合切除术(c-APE)的切除范围以包括盆腔后膈,从而减少低位直肠癌的切缘受累情况。本研究旨在确定在实施ELAPE和c-APE术后的MRI检查中意外残留盆腔膈的发生率及定位。共纳入147例接受c-APE或ELAPE治疗的直肠癌患者。队列中的51%(n = 75)患者接受了术后MRI检查,并由一名接受过盆腔MRI培训的放射科医生对残留盆腔膈进行评估。对患者记录、组织病理学报告和标准化照片进行了评估。病理和MRI检查结果由专人在不知情的情况下独立评估。此外,对术前MRI进行评估以寻找可能的切缘受累风险因素。在接受ELAPE的61例患者中,45例(75.4%)经磁共振成像检测到残留盆腔膈,在接受c-APE的14例患者中,14例(100%)检测到残留盆腔膈。在前位肿瘤患者中观察到切缘受累风险增加,73例前位肿瘤中有16例(22%)出现切缘受累,而74例非前位肿瘤中有7例(9%)出现切缘受累(P = 0.038)。经腹会阴联合切除术后的残留盆腔膈可通过术后MRI显示。在采用ELAPE技术治疗的患者系列中普遍发现意外残留盆腔膈(RPD)。无论采用何种手术方式,肿瘤位于前方都是环周切缘(CRM)受累的一个风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/4e89fa23043c/fsurg-08-771107-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/e94c399cedd5/fsurg-08-771107-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/f4ec531f55fd/fsurg-08-771107-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/c13b345656df/fsurg-08-771107-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/af3664600851/fsurg-08-771107-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/05d91028c51e/fsurg-08-771107-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/4e89fa23043c/fsurg-08-771107-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/e94c399cedd5/fsurg-08-771107-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/f4ec531f55fd/fsurg-08-771107-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/c13b345656df/fsurg-08-771107-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/af3664600851/fsurg-08-771107-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/05d91028c51e/fsurg-08-771107-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b152/8635027/4e89fa23043c/fsurg-08-771107-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Postoperative MRI Findings Following Conventional and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision in Low Rectal Cancer.低位直肠癌传统和经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术后的MRI表现
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 16;8:771107. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.771107. eCollection 2021.
2
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision versus conventional surgery for low rectal cancer: a single surgeon experience.经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术与传统手术治疗低位直肠癌:单术者经验
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2016 Dec 1;32(4):244-247. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2016.3251. eCollection 2016.
3
Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE) is Not Superior to Abdominoperineal Excision (APE) in the Era of Neoadjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer.超低位直肠前切除术(ELAPE)在新辅助治疗时代并不优于经腹会阴联合切除术(APE)。
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2022 Dec 4;43(3):21-27. doi: 10.2478/prilozi-2022-0033. Print 2022 Nov 1.
4
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (Elape): A retrospective cohort study.经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(Elape):一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Jul 20;10:32-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.016. eCollection 2016 Sep.
5
Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.直肠癌的经肛提肌外与标准腹会阴联合切除术
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Mar;19(3):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1243-8. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.多中心倾向评分匹配分析传统与扩大经腹会阴切除术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jun;101(7):874-82. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9522.
7
Extralevator versus standard abdominoperineal excision in locally advanced rectal cancer: a retrospective study with long-term follow-up.臀旁会阴联合切除术与标准经腹会阴联合切除术治疗局部进展期直肠癌的回顾性研究:一项长期随访研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;33(4):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-2977-y. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
8
[Meta-analysis of extralevator abdominoperineal excision and conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer].[低位直肠癌经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术与传统腹会阴联合切除术的Meta分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Jul;16(7):622-7.
9
Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.直肠癌的经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术(ELAPE)——来自瑞典结直肠癌登记处的短期结果。有必要选择性地使用ELAPE。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;29(8):981-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-1932-9. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
10
Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术术后会阴伤口并发症:一家区域癌症中心的经验
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;9(2):211-214. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0741-y. Epub 2018 Apr 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of a multidisciplinary training programme on outcome of upper rectal cancer by critical appraisal of the extent of mesorectal excision with postoperative MRI.多学科培训方案对术后 MRI 评估中直肠系膜切除范围对上段直肠癌结局的影响。
BJS Open. 2020 Apr;4(2):274-283. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50242. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
2
3D imaging and printing in pelvic colorectal cancer: 'The New Kid on the Block'.盆腔结直肠癌的3D成像与打印:“初来乍到者”
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 Feb;23(2):171-173. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1922-y. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
3
Abdominoperineal Excision: Technical Challenges in Optimal Surgical and Oncological Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
腹会阴联合切除术:直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术后实现最佳手术和肿瘤学结局的技术挑战
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017 Nov;30(5):357-367. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606113. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
Individualizing surgical treatment based on tumour response following neoadjuvant therapy in T4 primary rectal cancer.基于新辅助治疗后肿瘤反应对T4期原发性直肠癌进行个体化手术治疗。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;43(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 17.
5
Wound Complications and Perineal Pain After Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Excision: A Nationwide Study.经肛提肌外与标准腹会阴联合切除术术后伤口并发症及会阴疼痛:一项全国性研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Sep;59(9):813-21. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000639.
6
Extralevator with vs nonextralevator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer: the RELAPe randomized controlled trial.经括约肌间切除术与非经括约肌间切除术行腹会阴联合直肠癌切除术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究(RELAPe 研究)
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Feb;19(2):148-157. doi: 10.1111/codi.13436.
7
Similar long-term overall and disease-free survival after conventional and extralevator abdominoperineal excision-a nationwide study.传统与经肛提肌外腹会阴联合切除术的长期总体生存率和无病生存率相似——一项全国性研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jul;31(7):1341-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2596-4. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer--Extensive Surgery to Be Used With Discretion Based on 3-Year Local Recurrence Results: A Registry-based, Observational National Cohort Study.低位直肠癌的经肛提肌腹会阴联合切除术——基于3年局部复发结果谨慎使用的广泛手术:一项基于登记的全国性观察队列研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):516-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001237.
9
Time to Rethink ELAPE?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 May;58(5):e75. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000362.
10
Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study.低位直肠癌磁共振成像分期系统的前瞻性验证及局部复发风险分层模型的建立:MERCURY II研究
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):751-60. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001193.