Eicher Logan D, Markley Arielle Pechette, Shoben Abigail, Sundby Annika E, Kieves Nina R
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Veterinary Medical Center, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Nov 17;8:761493. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.761493. eCollection 2021.
The aim of this study was to evaluate and define paw placement patterns for canines completing the weave pole obstacle during canine agility trials. The secondary objectives were to determine the most efficient running style and completion percentages and provide a basis for future studies to evaluate the long-term implications of variants in weave style and predisposition to injury. We hypothesized that dogs would display definitive gait patterns and that a single stepping pattern would yield faster run times compared to double stepping patterns. A total of 1,377 video recordings of dogs completing weaves poles at the American Kennel Club 2019 National Agility Championship were viewed. Competition videos were reviewed as dogs attempted completion of the weave pole obstacle. Data collected included front limb and rear limb paw placement styles, time to complete the obstacle, and demographic data. Attempts could be classified into one of five styles based on front and rear paw placement, with no one style dominant. Weave style differed by height and breed, with taller dogs and Border Collies preferring a single stepping style. Weave times were significantly faster for competitors using a single stepping style vs. other gaits. This study found five identifiable gait styles used by dogs running weave pole obstacles, with front feet single stepping yielding significantly faster run times compared to other gaits. A clear classification of running styles will allow future studies to evaluate different stresses on joints, such as the shoulder, between varying gait styles, which could lead to recommendations for injury prevention.
本研究的目的是评估和定义犬类在敏捷性试验中完成穿梭杆障碍时的爪部放置模式。次要目标是确定最有效的奔跑方式和完成百分比,并为未来研究评估穿梭方式变体的长期影响以及受伤易感性提供基础。我们假设狗会表现出明确的步态模式,并且与双步模式相比,单步模式会产生更快的奔跑时间。我们查看了美国养犬俱乐部2019年全国敏捷性锦标赛中1377只狗完成穿梭杆的视频记录。在狗尝试完成穿梭杆障碍时,对比赛视频进行了审查。收集的数据包括前肢和后肢的爪部放置方式、完成障碍的时间以及人口统计学数据。根据前后爪的放置方式,尝试可分为五种方式之一,没有一种方式占主导地位。穿梭方式因身高和品种而异,体型较高的狗和边境牧羊犬更喜欢单步方式。与其他步态相比,采用单步方式的参赛者的穿梭时间明显更快。本研究发现狗在奔跑穿梭杆障碍时使用五种可识别的步态方式,与其他步态相比,前脚单步产生的奔跑时间明显更快。对奔跑方式进行明确分类将使未来的研究能够评估不同步态方式之间关节(如肩部)所承受的不同压力,这可能会为预防损伤提供建议。