De Luigi Nicola, Rizza Roberto, Santangelo Federica
Department of Political and Social Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Sociol. 2021 Nov 15;6:707591. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.707591. eCollection 2021.
This paper examines the age at retirement for men and women in Italy. Despite the expansion of women's educational attainments, they still display lower employment rates, are frequently engaged in involuntary part-time jobs and have more fragmented careers. As a consequence, the mean age at which women receive a pension is higher than that of men. Using Labour Force Survey (2006 and 2012), the authors test the hypothesis that women's higher age at retirement is determined by a selection bias towards more educated and work oriented women. A Heckman selection model has been developed. Results show that the main disadvantage is suffered by women with medium and low levels of education who show the highest estimated age at retirement, whereas higher educated women retire on average before men with the same level of education. The authors argue that pension policies, without interventions in the field of work-life balance policies, end up penalizing women with lower levels of education.
本文研究了意大利男性和女性的退休年龄。尽管女性的教育程度有所提高,但她们的就业率仍然较低,经常从事非自愿兼职工作,职业经历也更加零散。因此,女性领取养老金的平均年龄高于男性。作者利用劳动力调查(2006年和2012年)检验了以下假设:女性较高的退休年龄是由对受教育程度较高且以工作为导向的女性的选择偏差所决定的。作者构建了一个赫克曼选择模型。结果表明,教育程度中等和较低的女性是主要的劣势群体,她们的估计退休年龄最高,而受教育程度较高的女性平均比具有相同教育水平的男性退休更早。作者认为,在没有对工作与生活平衡政策领域进行干预的情况下,养老金政策最终会对教育程度较低的女性不利。