Utkan Karasu Ayça, Karasu Yetkin, Özakşit Müzeyyen Gülnur, Üstün Yusuf, Üstün Engin Yaprak
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gazi University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Sep 1;67(3):322-327. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2021.5918. eCollection 2021 Sep.
This study aims to compare the fracture risk calculated with Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) in patients with natural and surgical menopause.
Between April 2019 and July 2019, 285 postmenopausal patients (mean age 57.3 years; range, 40 to 78 years) who were admitted to the menopause clinic were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. Of these, 220 were in natural menopause and 65 were in surgical menopause. Demographic data, medical history, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire scores were collected through face-to-face interviews with the patients. Femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae (L1-L4) T-scores were evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Fragility fracture risk was assessed using FRAX®.
The groups were similar in terms of age, body mass index, duration of menopause, smoking, alcohol use, and history of fracture (p>0.05). The risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture calculated without adding bone mineral density (BMD) was similar between groups (p=0.417 and p=0.234). The risk of hip fracture calculated with the addition of BMD was higher in natural menopause patients (p=0.023). Lumbar vertebrae T-scores were similar between two groups regardless of age; femoral neck T-scores were higher in surgical menopause (T-score=-0.8) than natural menopause group (T-score=-1.25) aged under 60 years, whereas this difference disappeared after 60 years of age.
In our study, the fracture risk and the severity of osteoporosis were not different in surgical menopausal patients compared to the natural menopausal patients. Hip fracture risk calculated using BMD was lower in patients under 50 years of age in surgical menopausal patients. However, the fracture risks were similar in both groups after 50 years of age.
本研究旨在比较使用骨折风险评估工具(FRAX®)计算的自然绝经和手术绝经患者的骨折风险。
2019年4月至2019年7月期间,入住绝经门诊的285例绝经后患者(平均年龄57.3岁;范围40至78岁)纳入了这项前瞻性横断面研究。其中,220例为自然绝经,65例为手术绝经。通过与患者面对面访谈收集人口统计学数据、病史和国际体力活动问卷得分。使用双能X线吸收法评估股骨颈和腰椎(L1-L4)的T值。使用FRAX®评估脆性骨折风险。
两组在年龄、体重指数、绝经持续时间、吸烟、饮酒和骨折史方面相似(p>0.05)。在不添加骨密度(BMD)的情况下计算的主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折风险在两组之间相似(p=0.417和p=0.234)。添加BMD后计算的髋部骨折风险在自然绝经患者中更高(p=0.023)。无论年龄如何,两组之间的腰椎T值相似;60岁以下的手术绝经组(T值=-0.8)的股骨颈T值高于自然绝经组(T值=-1.25),而60岁以后这种差异消失。
在我们的研究中,与自然绝经患者相比,手术绝经患者的骨折风险和骨质疏松严重程度没有差异。手术绝经患者中50岁以下患者使用BMD计算的髋部骨折风险较低。然而,50岁以后两组的骨折风险相似。