• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非对称政治极化的非线性反馈动力学。

The nonlinear feedback dynamics of asymmetric political polarization.

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;

Department of Political Science, Queens College and The Graduate Center, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367;

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102149118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2102149118
PMID:34876513
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8685731/
Abstract

Using a general model of opinion dynamics, we conduct a systematic investigation of key mechanisms driving elite polarization in the United States. We demonstrate that the self-reinforcing nature of elite-level processes can explain this polarization, with voter preferences accounting for its asymmetric nature. Our analysis suggests that subtle differences in the frequency and amplitude with which public opinion shifts left and right over time may have a differential effect on the self-reinforcing processes of elites, causing Republicans to polarize more quickly than Democrats. We find that as self-reinforcement approaches a critical threshold, polarization speeds up. Republicans appear to have crossed that threshold while Democrats are currently approaching it.

摘要

利用一个通用的舆论动态模型,我们系统地研究了导致美国精英极化的关键机制。我们证明,精英层面的自我强化过程可以解释这种极化现象,而选民偏好则解释了其不对称性。我们的分析表明,随着时间的推移,公众舆论向左和向右转移的频率和幅度的细微差异可能对精英的自我强化过程产生不同的影响,导致共和党人比民主党人更快地极化。我们发现,随着自我强化接近一个临界阈值,极化速度加快。共和党人似乎已经越过了这个门槛,而民主党人目前正在接近这个门槛。

相似文献

1
The nonlinear feedback dynamics of asymmetric political polarization.非对称政治极化的非线性反馈动力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102149118.
2
Preventing extreme polarization of political attitudes.防止政治态度的极端极化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102139118.
3
Political identity and risk politics: Evidence from a pandemic.政治身份与风险政治:来自一场大流行病的证据。
Risk Anal. 2024 Oct 14. doi: 10.1111/risa.17654.
4
Political polarization of conservation issues in the era of COVID-19: An examination of partisan perspectives and priorities in the United States.新冠疫情时代保护问题的政治两极分化:对美国党派观点和优先事项的审视。
J Nat Conserv. 2022 Jun;67:126176. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126176. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
An ideological asymmetry in the diffusion of moralized content on social media among political leaders.社交媒体上政治领袖传播道德化内容的思想不对称。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Oct;148(10):1802-1813. doi: 10.1037/xge0000532. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Putting Within-Country Political Differences in (Global) Perspective.置于(全球)视角下的国内政治分歧。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231794. eCollection 2020.
7
Political polarization on support for government spending on environmental protection in the USA, 1974-2012.1974 - 2012年美国在支持政府环境保护支出方面的政治两极分化。
Soc Sci Res. 2014 Nov;48:251-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.008. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
8
Elite party cues increase vaccination intentions among Republicans.精英党派暗示增加共和党人的疫苗接种意愿。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 10;118(32). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106559118.
9
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化:党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
10
Political differences in past, present, and future life satisfaction: Republicans are more sensitive than democrats to political climate.过去、现在和未来生活满意度中的政治差异:共和党人比民主党人对政治气候更敏感。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 5;9(6):e98854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098854. eCollection 2014.

引用本文的文献

1
Re-assessing the Dynamics of News Use and Trust: A Multi-Outlet Perspective.重新评估新闻使用与信任的动态变化:多渠道视角
Communic Res. 2024 Aug 28;52(6):826-855. doi: 10.1177/00936502241273263. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Homophily and social influence as mechanisms of loneliness clustering in social networks.作为社交网络中孤独感聚集机制的同质性和社会影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 4;15(1):15576. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99057-x.
3
Unraveling polarization: insights into individual and collective dynamics.解析极化:洞察个体与集体动态
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 15;3(10):pgae426. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae426. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Modelling opinion dynamics under the impact of influencer and media strategies.在有影响力者和媒体策略影响下的舆论动态建模。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 8;13(1):19375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-46187-9.
5
The attitudinal space framework: Embracing the multidimensionality of attitudinal diversity.态度空间框架:接纳态度多样性的多维性。
iScience. 2023 Jul 16;26(8):107340. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107340. eCollection 2023 Aug 18.
6
Humans strategically avoid connecting to others who agree and avert the emergence of network polarization in a coordination task.人类在协调任务中会有意避免与意见一致的人进行交流,从而避免网络极化的出现。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 12;13(1):11299. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38353-w.
7
Political network composition predicts vaccination attitudes.政治网络构成预测疫苗接种态度。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:116004. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116004. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
8
Link updating strategies influence consensus decisions as a function of the direction of communication.链接更新策略作为沟通方向的函数会影响共识决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 7;10(6):230215. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230215. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Wild animals suppress the spread of socially transmitted misinformation.野生动物抑制了社会传播错误信息的蔓延。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Apr 4;120(14):e2215428120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215428120. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
10
Deeper Than You Think: Partisanship-Dependent Brain Responses in Early Sensory and Motor Brain Regions.远比你想象的更深入: partisanship-dependent brain responses in early sensory and motor brain regions.
J Neurosci. 2023 Feb 8;43(6):1027-1037. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0895-22.2022. Epub 2023 Jan 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks.在线社交网络中的链接推荐算法和极化动力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 14;118(50). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2102141118.