Suppr超能文献

谁获得了质子泵抑制剂的处方,原因是什么?利用德国巴伐利亚州 2010-2018 年的索赔数据进行的药物利用研究。

Who gets prescriptions for proton pump inhibitors and why? A drug-utilization study with claims data in Bavaria, Germany, 2010-2018.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry, and Epidemiology (IBE), Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.

Chair of Epidemiology, University of Augsburg at University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr;78(4):657-667. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03257-z. Epub 2021 Dec 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The German annual drug prescription-report has indicated overuse of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for many years; however, little was known about the characteristics of people using PPIs. This study aimed to provide comprehensive utilization data and describe frequencies of potential on- and off-label PPI-indications in Bavaria, Germany.

METHODS

Claims data of statutorily insured people from 2010 to 2018 were used. Defined daily doses (DDDs) of PPIs by type of drug, prevalence of PPI-use and DDDs prescribed per 1000 insured people/day were analyzed. For 2018, proportions of users and DDDs per 1000 insured people were calculated by age and sex. To elucidate changes in prescribing practices due to a suspected drug-drug interaction, we examined co-prescribing of clopidogrel and PPIs between 2010 and 2018. For PPI new users, sums of DDDs and frequencies of potential indications were examined.

RESULTS

PPI prescribing increased linearly from 2010 to 2016 and gradually decreased from 2016 to 2018. In 2018, 14.7% of women and 12.2% of men received at least one prescription, and 64.8 DDDs (WHO-def.) per 1000 insured people/day were prescribed. Overall, omeprazole use decreased over the observation period and was steadily replaced by pantoprazole, especially when co-prescibed with clopidogrel. An on-label PPI-indication was not reported at first intake in 52.0% of new users.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of prescribed PPIs has decreased since 2016. However, a large proportion of new PPI-users had no documentation of a potential indication, and the sums of DDDs prescribed often seemed not to comply with guidelines.

摘要

目的

德国年度药物处方报告多年来一直表明质子泵抑制剂 (PPIs) 被过度使用;然而,人们对使用 PPI 的人群特征知之甚少。本研究旨在提供综合利用数据,并描述德国巴伐利亚州 PPI 的潜在适应证的使用频率和适应证外使用情况。

方法

使用 2010 年至 2018 年参保人员的索赔数据。分析了不同类型 PPI 的限定日剂量 (DDD)、PPI 使用的流行率以及每千名参保人员/天规定的 DDD。对于 2018 年,按年龄和性别计算了使用者的比例和每千名参保人员的 DDD。为了阐明因疑似药物相互作用而改变的处方实践,我们检查了 2010 年至 2018 年氯吡格雷和 PPI 的共同处方。对于新使用 PPI 的患者,检查了 DDD 总和和潜在适应证的频率。

结果

2010 年至 2016 年 PPI 处方呈线性增加,2016 年至 2018 年逐渐减少。2018 年,14.7%的女性和 12.2%的男性至少接受了一次处方,每千名参保人员/天规定的 DDD 为 64.8(世界卫生组织定义)。总体而言,在观察期间,奥美拉唑的使用量逐渐减少,而泮托拉唑的使用量稳步增加,尤其是与氯吡格雷联合使用时。新使用者中有 52.0%的人首次使用时没有记录潜在适应证。

结论

自 2016 年以来,处方 PPI 的使用量有所下降。然而,很大一部分新的 PPI 使用者没有潜在适应证的记录,规定的 DDD 总和往往不符合指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8f4/8927002/48578edfd8d4/228_2021_3257_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验