Pennings Guido
Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 2022 Mar 1;37(3):389-392. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab273.
Huele and colleagues started a debate on the comparison between embryo donation and double donation. Although I largely agree with their final conclusion, I believe that the perspective of the recipients needs to be added to get a more complete picture. The present contribution focuses on that perspective and advances other arguments to balance the two methods. The main argument in favour of double donation is the difference in perceived meaning for the recipients compared to surplus embryos. The main arguments in favour of embryo donation are the fair distribution of scarce resources (i.e. donor gametes) and the principle of non-maleficence through the avoidance of unnecessary oocyte donation cycles. The balance would be to put both treatments on an equal footing.
休勒及其同事开启了一场关于胚胎捐赠与双重捐赠比较的辩论。尽管我在很大程度上认同他们的最终结论,但我认为需要加入受助者的视角,以便更全面地看待问题。本文着重探讨这一视角,并提出其他论据来权衡这两种方法。支持双重捐赠的主要论据是,与多余胚胎相比,受助者所感知到的意义存在差异。支持胚胎捐赠的主要论据是稀缺资源(即捐赠者配子)的公平分配,以及通过避免不必要的卵母细胞捐赠周期来遵循不伤害原则。平衡的做法是使两种治疗方法处于平等地位。