Bybee Seth M, Ogden T Heath, Branham Marc A, Whiting Michael F
Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Department of Integrative Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Cladistics. 2008 Aug;24(4):477-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00191.x. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
We undertook a comprehensive morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of dragonfly phylogeny, examining both extant and fossil lineages in simultaneous analyses. The legitimacy of higher-level family groups and the phylogenetic relationship between families were tested. Thirteen families were supported as monophyletic (Aeshnidae, Calopterygidae, Chlorocyphidae, Euphaeidae, Gomphidae, Isostictidae, Lestidae, Libellulidae, Petaluridae, Platystictidae, Polythoridae, Pseudostigmatidae and Synthemistidae) and eight as non-monophyletic (Amphipterygidae, Coenagrionidae, Corduliidae, Megapodagrionidae, Protoneuridae and Synlestidae), although Perilestidae and Platycnemididae were recovered as monophyletic under Bayesian analyses. Nine families were represented by one species, thus monophyly was not tested (Epiophlebiidae, Austropetaliidae, Chlorogomphidae, Cordulegastridae, Macromiidae, Chorismagrionidae, Diphlebiidae, Lestoideidae and Pseudolestidae). Epiprocta and Zygoptera were recovered as monophyletic. Ditaxinerua is supported as the sister lineage to Odonata, Epiophlebiidae and the lestid-like damselflies are sister to the Epiprocta and Zygoptera, respectively. Austropetaliidae + Aeshnidae is the sister lineage to the remaining Anisoptera. Tarsophlebia's placement as sister to Epiprocta or as sister to Epiprocta + Zygoptera was not resolved. Refinements are made to the current classification. Fossil taxa did not seem to provide signals crucial to recovering a robust phylogeny, but were critical to understanding the evolution of key morphological features associated with flight. Characters associated with wing structure were optimized revealing two wing character complexes: the pterostigma-nodal brace complex and the costal wing base & costal-ScP junction complex. In turn, these two complexes appear to be associated; the pterostigma-nodal brace complex allowing for further modification of the wing characters comprised within the costal wing base & costal-ScP junction complex leading the modern odonate wing. © The Willi Hennig Society 2008.
我们对蜻蜓系统发育进行了全面的形态学和分子系统发育分析,在同步分析中研究了现存和化石谱系。检验了高级分类单元科的合法性以及各科之间的系统发育关系。13个科被支持为单系科(大蜓科、色蟌科、丽蟌科、扇蟌科、春蜓科、等脉蟌科、丝蟌科、蜻科、澳蟌科、扁蟌科、多脉蟌科、伪蜻科和综蟌科),8个科为非单系科(双翅蟌科、 Coenagrionidae、 Corduliidae、 Megapodagrionidae、原蟌科和 Synlestidae),尽管在贝叶斯分析下,原蟌科和溪蟌科被恢复为单系科。9个科仅由一个物种代表,因此未检验其单系性(蜓科、澳琵蟌科、 Chlorogomphidae、大蜻科、大蜓科、 Chorismagrionidae、 Diphlebiidae、丝蟌总科和 Pseudolestidae)。原蜓亚目和均翅亚目被恢复为单系。 Ditaxinerua被支持为蜻蜓目的姐妹谱系,蜓科和似丝蟌科豆娘分别是原蜓亚目和均翅亚目的姐妹。澳琵蟌科 + 大蜓科是其余差翅亚目的姐妹谱系。 Tarsophlebia作为原蜓亚目的姐妹或作为原蜓亚目 + 均翅亚目的姐妹的位置未得到解决。对当前分类进行了细化。化石类群似乎没有提供对于恢复一个稳健的系统发育至关重要的信号,但对于理解与飞行相关的关键形态特征的进化至关重要。与翅结构相关的特征被优化,揭示了两个翅特征复合体:翅痣 - 节间支撑复合体和前缘翅基部与前缘 - 亚前缘脉交界处复合体。反过来,这两个复合体似乎是相关的;翅痣 - 节间支撑复合体允许对包含在前缘翅基部与前缘 - 亚前缘脉交界处复合体内的翅特征进行进一步修饰,从而形成现代蜻蜓翅。 © 威利·亨尼希协会2008年。