• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术对脂代谢的选择性影响。

Selective effect of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on lipid metabolism.

机构信息

Cátedra de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina Universidad Nacional del Nordeste (UNNE), Corrientes, Argentina; Departamento de Nutrición y Diabetes, Centro de Endocrinología y Nutrición (CIEN), Corrientes, Argentina.

Departamento de Cirugía Bariátrica y Metabólica, Centro de Endocrinología y Nutrición (CIEN), Corrientes, Argentina.

出版信息

Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2022 Mar-Apr;34(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.arteri.2021.09.005
PMID:34879979
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery (BS) has shown to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in obesity. The BS has improved the dyslipidemia of the insulin resistant patient, our objective was to evaluate if there was a difference in the lipid profile between the laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) technique vs. the sleeve gastrectomy (SG) technique at 18 months of follow-up.

METHODS

An observational, open, prospective study of morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery at 18-month follow-up. Anthropometric analysis, body composition, energy expenditure at rest, glucose, insulin, HbA, LDL, HDL, TG and CT were performed.

RESULTS

Absence baseline differences were found in the proportion of patients with hypertension, diabetes, steatosis, and sex between the RYGB vs SG groups. A reduction of TG was observed at 6 months in favor of RYGB vs SG: 108.60±34.86 vs. 124.59±44.58, P = 0.044), however, a decrease in both LDL levels was found at 12 and 18 months in favor of the RYGB vs. SG group: 96.23±24.33 vs. 107.83±28.88, P = 0.025; 90.98±20.62 vs 106.22±31.48, P = 0.003; the decrease in CT was observed only at 18 months in favor of the RYGB vs. SG group: 171.39±25.058 vs. 186.89±31.81, P = 0.005. CONCLUSIóN: RYBG has shown to be more effective in reducing LDL and CT levels compared to SG, which provides an additional benefit of RYGB in relation to the lipid profile of the patient.

摘要

简介

减重手术(BS)已被证明可降低肥胖患者的心血管发病率和死亡率。BS 改善了胰岛素抵抗患者的血脂异常,我们的目的是评估在 18 个月的随访中,腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)与袖状胃切除术(SG)技术之间的血脂谱是否存在差异。

方法

对接受减重手术的病态肥胖患者进行了一项观察性、开放性、前瞻性研究,随访时间为 18 个月。进行了人体测量分析、身体成分、休息时能量消耗、血糖、胰岛素、HbA、LDL、HDL、TG 和 CT。

结果

RYGB 与 SG 组之间在高血压、糖尿病、脂肪肝和性别患者的比例上无基线差异。在 6 个月时观察到 TG 下降,RYGB 优于 SG:108.60±34.86 vs. 124.59±44.58,P=0.044),然而,在 12 个月和 18 个月时,两组 LDL 水平均下降,RYGB 优于 SG 组:96.23±24.33 vs. 107.83±28.88,P=0.025;90.98±20.62 vs 106.22±31.48,P=0.003;仅在 18 个月时观察到 CT 下降,RYGB 优于 SG 组:171.39±25.058 vs. 186.89±31.81,P=0.005。结论:RYGB 降低 LDL 和 CT 水平的效果优于 SG,这为 RYGB 与患者的血脂谱相关的提供了额外的益处。

相似文献

1
Selective effect of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on lipid metabolism.腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术对脂代谢的选择性影响。
Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2022 Mar-Apr;34(2):68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.arteri.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Dec 5.
2
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Is More Effective than Sleeve Gastrectomy in Improving Postprandial Glycaemia and Lipaemia in Non-diabetic Morbidly Obese Patients: a Short-term Follow-up Analysis.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在改善非糖尿病肥胖患者餐后血糖和血脂方面比袖状胃切除术更有效:一项短期随访分析。
Obes Surg. 2018 Dec;28(12):3997-4005. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3454-y.
3
Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy on Lipid Levels in Type 2 Diabetes: a Meta-analysis.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术治疗 2 型糖尿病患者血脂水平的疗效:荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug;26(8):1575-1584. doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05338-5. Epub 2022 May 5.
4
Effects of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass on Postprandial Lipid Profile in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients: a 2-Year Follow-up.袖状胃切除术和胃旁路手术对肥胖2型糖尿病患者餐后血脂谱的影响:一项为期2年的随访研究
Obes Surg. 2016 Jun;26(6):1247-53. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1891-4.
5
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy achieve comparable weight loss at 1 year.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术在1年内实现的体重减轻效果相当。
Am Surg. 2012 Dec;78(12):1325-8.
6
Ghrelin, leptin, and glycemic control after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-results of a randomized clinical trial.袖状胃切除术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后胃饥饿素、瘦素及血糖控制——一项随机临床试验的结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 Feb;13(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.025. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
7
Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.三种减肥手术方法的比较效果:Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术、腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Surgical, metabolic, and prognostic outcomes for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的手术、代谢和预后结局:系统评价。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Dec;17(12):2097-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.06.020. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
9
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: case-control study.腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术治疗病态肥胖:病例对照研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Jul-Aug;7(4):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2011.01.037. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
10
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的长期随访:减肥和缓解合并症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Lipid Changes 10-15 Years After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Prospective Observational Study.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后10 - 15年的血脂变化:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Obes Surg. 2025 Feb;35(2):441-449. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07601-x. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
2
Early changes of microRNAs in blood one month after bariatric surgery.减肥手术后一个月血液中微小RNA的早期变化。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Jul 15;16(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01364-2.