Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Medical Faculty, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Center for Dementia Care, Institute of Applied Nursing Sciences, Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St Gallen, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e054157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054157.
Information technology can enhance timely and individual support for people with dementia and informal carers. There is some evidence that people with dementia and informal carers would benefit from technology-based counselling. However, it remains unclear which features of those interventions relate to beneficial outcomes and which aspects are necessary for a successful implementation. Therefore, the primary objectives are: (1) to identify conditions of successful implementation of technology-based counselling interventions in dementia and (2) to investigate the effectiveness of those interventions.
We will conduct a mixed-methods systematic review. The first primary objective requires evidence from various study designs addressing aspects on effective and non-effective implementation of technology-based counselling. This could be telephone-based, web-based or mobile-based interventions for people with dementia and informal carers. For the second primary objective, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with any outcomes will be included. Year of publication and language will not be restricted. We will search CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science up to April 2021. Additionally, we will perform web searching and citation tracking. To achieve the first primary objective, a Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) will be conducted. The QCA enables us to identify necessary or sufficient components for a successful implementation. To reach the second primary objective, a meta-analysis will be performed with respect to potential clinical and statistical heterogeneity of RCTs. The revised Risk of Bias tool 2.0 will be used to check the risk of bias in RCTs. For all other study designs, the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool will be used.
Ethics approval is not required for this review. We will disseminate our findings through scientific and non-scientific journal articles and conference presentations as well as formats directed to the public and decision-makers in healthcare.
CRD42021245473.
信息技术可以增强对痴呆症患者和非正式照顾者的及时和个性化支持。有证据表明,痴呆症患者和非正式照顾者可以从基于技术的咨询中受益。然而,仍然不清楚哪些干预措施的特点与有益的结果相关,以及哪些方面对于成功实施是必要的。因此,主要目标是:(1)确定成功实施基于技术的咨询干预措施在痴呆症中的条件,(2)研究这些干预措施的效果。
我们将进行一项混合方法系统评价。第一个主要目标需要来自各种研究设计的证据,这些设计涉及基于技术的咨询有效和无效实施的各个方面。这可能是针对痴呆症患者和非正式照顾者的基于电话、基于网络或基于移动的干预措施。对于第二个主要目标,将纳入涉及任何结果的随机对照试验(RCT)。不限制出版年份和语言。我们将在 2021 年 4 月之前搜索 CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆、MEDLINE、PsycINFO 和 Web of Science。此外,我们将进行网络搜索和引文跟踪。为了实现第一个主要目标,我们将进行定性比较分析(QCA)。QCA 使我们能够确定成功实施的必要或充分组成部分。为了实现第二个主要目标,我们将对 RCT 进行潜在的临床和统计异质性的荟萃分析。修订后的风险偏倚工具 2.0 将用于检查 RCT 的风险偏倚。对于所有其他研究设计,将使用混合方法评估工具。
本综述不需要伦理批准。我们将通过科学和非科学期刊文章以及针对公众和医疗保健决策者的会议演示以及格式来传播我们的发现。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021245473。