• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploring experiences of times without care and encounters in dementia: protocol for a living and adaptive evidence map.探索痴呆症无照护和无照护经历:生活和适应性证据图谱方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e075664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075664.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Impact of having a child on physical activity in the UK: a scoping review protocol.英国儿童对体力活动影响的研究综述方案
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e063410. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063410.
5
Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis.基于技术的痴呆症咨询(TeCoDem):一项混合方法系统评价的研究方案,包括定性比较分析和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e054157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054157.
6
Protocol for a systematic review on the experience of informal caregivers for people with a moderate to advanced dementia within a domestic home setting.针对在家庭环境中照顾中度至重度痴呆症患者的非正式照顾者的经验进行系统评价的方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 26;9(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01525-0.
7
Process of pain assessment in people with dementia living in nursing homes: a scoping review protocol.养老院中痴呆患者疼痛评估流程:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 28;12(9):e063230. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063230.
8
Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the detection of dementia within a secondary care setting.用于二级保健环境中痴呆检测的老年人认知减退 informant 问卷 (IQCODE)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD010772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010772.pub3.
9
Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) for the diagnosis of dementia within a secondary care setting.老年人认知功能减退知情者问卷(IQCODE)用于二级医疗环境中痴呆症的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 10(3):CD010772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010772.pub2.
10
Barriers in health and social care access and navigation for elder orphans: a scoping review protocol.老年人孤儿在获得卫生和社会保健方面的障碍和导航:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 31;11(5):e043876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043876.

引用本文的文献

1
Using artificial intelligence for the development of a living evidence map: The pharmacopuncture example.利用人工智能开发动态证据图谱:以水针疗法为例。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Dec;14(4):101217. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2025.101217. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
2
Exploring the Experiences of Times Without Care and Encounters in Persons With Dementia in the Swiss and German Nursing Home and Domiciliary Care Settings: Protocol for an Ethnographic Multimethods Study.探索瑞士和德国养老院及居家护理环境中痴呆症患者无人照料时期及遭遇的经历:一项民族志多方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Nov 18;13:e58190. doi: 10.2196/58190.

本文引用的文献

1
Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review.引文追踪在系统文献检索中的应用:范围综述。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 May;14(3):563-579. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1635. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
2
The move towards living systematic reviews and living guidelines in healthcare: consideration of the possibilities and challenges for living qualitative evidence syntheses.迈向医疗保健中系统评价和指南的实时化:对实时化定性证据综合的可能性和挑战的思考。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 16;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02218-0.
3
Technology-based counselling in dementia (TeCoDem): study protocol of a mixed-methods systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis and meta-analysis.基于技术的痴呆症咨询(TeCoDem):一项混合方法系统评价的研究方案,包括定性比较分析和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e054157. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054157.
4
Using citation tracking for systematic literature searching - study protocol for a scoping review of methodological studies and a Delphi study.使用引文追踪进行系统文献检索 - 方法学研究的范围综述和德尔菲研究的研究方案。
F1000Res. 2020 Dec 1;9:1386. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27337.3. eCollection 2020.
5
Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study.在痴呆症护理研究中,多个数据库检索和引文追踪的重叠:一项方法学研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):275-285. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.1129.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jun;134:178-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Social Robot Interventions for People with Dementia: A Systematic Review on Effects and Quality of Reporting.社交机器人干预对痴呆症患者的影响:系统评价及报告质量。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(2):773-792. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200347.
8
What hinders and facilitates the implementation of nurse-led interventions in dementia care? A scoping review.什么因素阻碍和促进了护士主导的痴呆症护理干预措施的实施?系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Apr 7;20(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01520-z.
9
Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial.使用多语种搜索翻译器改进搜索策略的翻译:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Apr;108(2):195-207. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.834. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
Use and impact of virtual reality simulation in dementia care education: A scoping review.虚拟现实模拟在痴呆症护理教育中的应用和影响:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Jan;84:104207. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104207. Epub 2019 Sep 12.

探索痴呆症无照护和无照护经历:生活和适应性证据图谱方案。

Exploring experiences of times without care and encounters in dementia: protocol for a living and adaptive evidence map.

机构信息

Department of Health, Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, St.Gallen, Switzerland

Pragmatic Evidence Lab, Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 20;13(9):e075664. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075664.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075664
PMID:37730385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10514613/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Individuals with dementia spend most of the day without care, without encounters, and usually without activity. Although this has been proven in studies, there is a knowledge gap on how individuals with dementia experience these periods of time. Such knowledge would be highly relevant for health professionals and relatives to develop adequate strategies for dealing with these periods of time. The study aims to reconstruct periods of time without care and encounters from the perspective of individuals with dementia and formal and informal carers. The specific objective of this review is to provide a continuously updated overview of the topical evidence that may be used to guide data synthesis and interpretation within the study.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We conduct a living evidence map, based on a comprehensive systematic literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO/Ovid and Web of Science Core Collection, citation-based searches and web searches. We include studies on times without care and encounters of individuals with dementia from the perspective of individuals with dementia themselves and formal or informal caregivers of any observational study design that were conducted in the institutional and domestic long-term care setting and published as journal article in English, French or German language without any restriction of the publication year. One reviewer screens titles, abstracts and full texts and extracts data. Key characteristics and results of the included studies are charted in a tabular format. The searches will be run and continuously updated throughout the duration of the overarching study (every 6 months for 2 years from 2023 to 2025).

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this evidence map. We disseminate our findings via journal articles and conference proceedings as well as other formats.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

This review protocol is uploaded on Open Science Framework (OSF; DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/GDYZ9).

摘要

简介

痴呆症患者大部分时间没有护理、没有互动,通常也没有活动。尽管这已在研究中得到证实,但对于痴呆症患者如何体验这些时间段,我们仍存在知识空白。这些知识对于卫生专业人员和亲属来说非常重要,可以帮助他们制定应对这些时间段的适当策略。本研究旨在从痴呆症患者和正式及非正式护理人员的角度重建无护理和无互动的时间段。本综述的具体目标是提供一个不断更新的主题证据概述,可用于指导研究中的数据综合和解释。

方法和分析

我们进行了一项实时证据图谱,基于对 MEDLINE/PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO/Ovid 和 Web of Science Core Collection 的全面系统文献检索、基于引文的检索和网络检索。我们纳入了从痴呆症患者自身和任何观察性研究设计的正式或非正式护理人员的角度研究痴呆症患者无护理和无互动时间段的研究,这些研究在机构和家庭长期护理环境中进行,以英文、法文或德文发表,无发表年份限制。一位评审员筛选标题、摘要和全文,并提取数据。纳入研究的关键特征和结果以表格形式呈现。检索将在整个研究期间(2023 年至 2025 年期间每 6 个月进行一次,为期 2 年)运行并不断更新。

伦理和传播

本证据图谱不需要伦理批准。我们将通过期刊文章和会议记录以及其他格式传播我们的研究结果。

注册详情

本综述方案已上传至开放科学框架(OSF;DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/GDYZ9)。