Riyadh Elm University, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 8;11(1):23608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03093-2.
This study aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness of virtual reality vs. topical anesthesia gel during the administration of local anesthesia (injections to numb the gums) in adult dental patients; as well as to determine which approach is preferred by the patients. Twenty-one adult patients received dental anesthetic injections bilaterally for their maxillary premolars area. We predicted that VR would be more effective than a topical anesthetic gel at reducing pain during injections into the gums. Using a within subject design, each patient received two injections during a single dental visit. Pain was measured after each injection. One side was of the mouth was injected under the influence of the topical anesthesia (TA) 20% benzocaine. The other side of the mouth was injected when the patient was in virtual reality (VR) watching an animated movie using an Oculus Quest® helmet to distract them during the other injection, treatment order randomized. Immediately after each injection, the patients were directed to rate their pain experience using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain-rating Scale (W-BFPS), and to choose which delivery system they preferred. Heart rates were recorded prior to and after the injections using a finger pulse oximeter. Participants reported the predicted pattern of a lower W-PFPS score (less pain intensity) during needle injection while in VR than the injection with topical anesthesia gel, however, the difference was not statistically significant. A statistically significant majority of the participants (p = 0.021) preferred VR to TA. No statistically significant difference heart rate during VR vs. TA was found. Although dental patients reported less pain during VR distraction vs. topical gel anesthetic, the difference was not significant. A statistically significant majority of patients preferred virtual reality over topical anesthesia during their future injections. However, no significant difference in heart rate was found.
本研究旨在比较虚拟现实与局部麻醉(注射以麻醉牙龈)时表面麻醉凝胶在成人牙科患者中的镇痛效果;并确定哪种方法更受患者的青睐。 21 名成年患者接受双侧上颌前磨牙区的牙科麻醉注射。我们预测,在注射到牙龈时,虚拟现实将比表面麻醉凝胶更有效减轻疼痛。使用受试者内设计,每位患者在单次牙科就诊时接受两次注射。每次注射后测量疼痛。一侧口腔在 20%苯佐卡因的局部麻醉(TA)作用下注射。当患者在虚拟现实(VR)中观看动画电影时,另一侧口腔被注射,使用 Oculus Quest®头盔分散注意力,治疗顺序随机。每次注射后,患者立即使用 Wong-Baker Faces Pain-rating Scale(W-BFPS)评估他们的疼痛体验,并选择他们喜欢的输送系统。使用手指脉搏血氧仪在注射前后记录心率。参与者报告了在 VR 中比在使用局部麻醉凝胶的注射时针插入时 W-PFPS 评分(疼痛强度降低)的预测模式,但差异无统计学意义。大多数参与者(p = 0.021)更喜欢 VR 而不是 TA。在 VR 与 TA 之间未发现心率有统计学显著差异。尽管牙科患者在 VR 分散注意力与局部凝胶麻醉时报告疼痛减轻,但差异无统计学意义。大多数患者在未来的注射中更喜欢虚拟现实而不是表面麻醉。然而,在心率方面没有发现显著差异。