Abdelmawla Mohamed, Hansen Gregory, Narvey Michael, Whyte Hilary, Ilodigwe Don, Lee Kyong-Soon
Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Division of Critical Care, Royal University Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Paediatr Child Health. 2021 May 27;26(7):e290-e296. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxab019. eCollection 2021 Nov.
The aim of this study was to evaluate if the presence of a physician in the neonatal transport team (NTT) affects transport-related outcomes and procedural success.
Retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
Canadian national study.
Neonatal transports from nontertiary centres between January 2014 and December 2017.
Comparison of transports conducted by NTTs with physicians (MD Group) and without physicians (noMD Group).
The primary outcome was the change in patient acuity as measured by the transport risk index of physiologic severity (TRIPS) score. Secondary outcomes included mortality within 24 hours of NICU admission, clinical complications during transport, procedural success, and stabilization time.
Among 9,703 eligible cases, 899 neonatal transports attended by NTTs with physicians were compared to 899 neonatal transports without physicians using propensity score matching. No differences were seen in the improvement of TRIPS score or mortality ≤24 hours of NICU admission. The MD Group had more clinical complications (7.7% versus 5.0%, P=0.02). No differences were seen in success rates of invasive procedures. The MD Group had shorter stabilization times. In multivariable analysis, the MD Group was not a significant predictor for the improvement in TRIPS score after adjustment for covariates.
Neonatal transports conducted by teams including physicians compared to teams without physicians, did not have higher improvement in TRIPS scores and had similar success rates for procedures. These results provide insights for the planning of the structure and training of specialized interfacility neonatal transport programs.
本研究旨在评估新生儿转运团队(NTT)中是否有医生会影响与转运相关的结局及操作成功率。
倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。
加拿大全国性研究。
2014年1月至2017年12月期间从非三级中心转出的新生儿。
比较由有医生的NTT(医学博士组)和无医生的NTT(无医学博士组)进行的转运。
主要结局是通过生理严重程度转运风险指数(TRIPS)评分衡量的患者病情严重程度变化。次要结局包括新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院后24小时内的死亡率、转运期间的临床并发症、操作成功率和稳定时间。
在9703例符合条件的病例中,采用倾向评分匹配法,将899例有医生参与的NTT转运的新生儿与899例无医生参与的新生儿转运进行比较。在TRIPS评分改善或NICU入院后≤24小时的死亡率方面未发现差异。医学博士组有更多临床并发症(7.7%对5.0%,P=0.02)。侵入性操作成功率未见差异。医学博士组的稳定时间更短。在多变量分析中,调整协变量后,医学博士组不是TRIPS评分改善的显著预测因素。
与无医生的团队相比,有医生的团队进行的新生儿转运在TRIPS评分方面没有更高的改善,操作成功率相似。这些结果为规划专门的机构间新生儿转运项目的结构和培训提供了见解。