Suppr超能文献

侧向流动检测设备,用于采集稻草采样法的死后犬狂犬病诊断样本。

Lateral flow devices for samples collected by straw sampling method for postmortem canine rabies diagnosis.

机构信息

Regional Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Agriculture Field Office III, San Fernando, Pampanga, Philippines.

Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Dec 9;15(12):e0009891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009891. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

The direct fluorescent antibody test (dFAT) using brain sample after opening the skull is the standard rabies diagnostic test in animal rabies. However, it is not feasible in many resource-limited settings. Lateral flow devices (LFD) combined with a simple sampling methodology is quicker, simpler, and less hazardous than the standard test and can be a useful tool. We conducted a prospective on-site study to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the LFD with the straw sampling method compared with that of the dFAT with the skull opening procedure for post-mortem canine rabies diagnosis. We collected 97 rabies-suspected animals between December 1, 2020 and March 31, 2021. Among the 97 samples, 53 and 50 cases were positive tests for dFAT and LFD, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of LFD with straw sampling method were 94.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.3-98.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 92.0-100%), respectively. The performance of LFD by the straw sampling method showed relatively high sensitivity and 100% specificity compared with that of dFAT performed on samples collected after opening the skull. This methodology can be beneficial and is a strong tool to overcome limited animal surveillance in remote areas. However, because of our limited sample size, more data using fresh samples on-site and the optimizations are urgently needed for the further implementation in endemic areas.

摘要

直接荧光抗体试验(dFAT)使用开颅后的脑组织样本是动物狂犬病的标准诊断检测方法。然而,在许多资源有限的环境中,这种方法并不可行。侧向流动设备(LFD)结合简单的采样方法比标准检测更快、更简单、更安全,是一种有用的工具。我们进行了一项前瞻性现场研究,评估了 LFD 与 straw 采样法与 dFAT 与开颅术在死后犬狂犬病诊断中的诊断准确性。我们在 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 3 月 31 日期间收集了 97 例疑似狂犬病的动物。在 97 个样本中,53 个和 50 个样本分别为 dFAT 和 LFD 阳性。LFD 与 straw 采样法的敏感性和特异性分别为 94.3%(95%置信区间 [CI],84.3-98.8%)和 100%(95% CI,92.0-100%)。与开颅采集样本进行的 dFAT 相比,LFD 通过 straw 采样法的表现具有相对较高的敏感性和 100%的特异性。这种方法可以是有益的,是克服偏远地区动物监测有限的有力工具。然而,由于我们的样本量有限,需要使用现场的新鲜样本进行更多的数据,并且需要对优化方法进行进一步研究,以在流行地区实施。

相似文献

1
Lateral flow devices for samples collected by straw sampling method for postmortem canine rabies diagnosis.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Dec 9;15(12):e0009891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009891. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of lateral flow devices as a tool to diagnose rabies in post-mortem animals.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Nov 5;14(11):e0008844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008844. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Evaluation of lateral flow devices for postmortem rabies diagnosis in animals in the Philippines: a multicenter study.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Dec 19;61(12):e0084223. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00842-23. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
Comparison of five different laboratory techniques for the rabies diagnosis in clinically suspected cattle in Brazil.
J Virol Methods. 2020 Sep;283:113918. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.113918. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Evaluation of Six Commercially Available Rapid Immunochromatographic Tests for the Diagnosis of Rabies in Brain Material.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 23;10(6):e0004776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004776. eCollection 2016 Jun.
7
Laboratory validation of confirmatory tests for rabies diagnosis: Approaches to reduce animal use and facilitate sample collection.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Nov;69(6):3449-3456. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14701. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
8
A comparative study of direct fluorescent antibody, mouse inoculation, and tissue culture infection testing for rabies diagnoses.
J Virol Methods. 2022 Feb;300:114426. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114426. Epub 2021 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Rabies Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Human and Canine Diagnostic Methods.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 8;15(4):412. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040412.
2
Evaluation of lateral flow devices for rabies diagnosis in decomposed animal brain samples.
Trop Med Health. 2025 Feb 25;53(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00699-4.
4
Evaluation of lateral flow devices for postmortem rabies diagnosis in animals in the Philippines: a multicenter study.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Dec 19;61(12):e0084223. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00842-23. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
5
United Against Rabies Forum: The first 2 years.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 23;11:1010071. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1010071. eCollection 2023.
7
Molecular Analysis of Rabies Virus Using RNA Extracted from Used Lateral Flow Devices.
J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Mar 23;61(3):e0154322. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01543-22. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Challenges to improved animal rabies surveillance: Experiences from pilot implementation of decentralized diagnostic units in Chad.
Acta Trop. 2021 Sep;221:105984. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105984. Epub 2021 May 28.
2
Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of lateral flow devices as a tool to diagnose rabies in post-mortem animals.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Nov 5;14(11):e0008844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008844. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
8
Pathobiological investigation of naturally infected canine rabies cases from Sri Lanka.
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Apr 12;13(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1024-5.
9
Validation of a Rapid Rabies Diagnostic Tool for Field Surveillance in Developing Countries.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Oct 5;10(10):e0005010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005010. eCollection 2016 Oct.
10
Evaluation of Six Commercially Available Rapid Immunochromatographic Tests for the Diagnosis of Rabies in Brain Material.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jun 23;10(6):e0004776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004776. eCollection 2016 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验