Aseni P, Beati C, Brambilla G, Bertini M, Belli L
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986 Jun;8(3 Pt 1):235-8. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198606000-00006.
The risk of gastroesophageal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with massive spontaneous portosystemic shunt (SPSS) has been evaluated variously in the literature. We undertook a retrospective study in a large group of cirrhotic patients admitted to our surgical department to evaluate the incidence of large SPSS and the correlation with current or previous episodes of gastroesophageal hemorrhage. Of 456 patients submitted to splenoportography or celiac-mesenteric angiography, 20 showed evidence on the roentgenograms of large self-established SPSS. They were classified into three groups: (a) splenorenal shunts (three patients); (b) mesenteric-caval shunts (two patients), and (c) large patent umbilical vein (15 patients). Twelve of these 20 patients had one or more episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding, and seven of them were submitted to surgical treatment to prevent recurrent bleeding. No correlation was found between the risk of esophageal hemorrhage and the type of SPSS. We concluded that, despite the presence of massive SPSS, cirrhotic patients have an unpredictable risk of bleeding and they often require surgical treatment to prevent recurrent episodes.
在文献中,对患有大量自发性门体分流(SPSS)的肝硬化患者发生胃食管出血的风险已有多种评估。我们对收入我院外科的一大组肝硬化患者进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估大量SPSS的发生率以及与当前或既往胃食管出血发作的相关性。在接受脾门静脉造影或腹腔 - 肠系膜血管造影的456例患者中,有20例在X线片上显示有大量自发形成的SPSS证据。他们被分为三组:(a)脾肾分流(3例患者);(b)肠系膜 - 腔静脉分流(2例患者),以及(c)粗大的脐静脉开放(15例患者)。这20例患者中有12例有一次或多次胃肠道出血发作,其中7例接受了手术治疗以预防再出血。未发现食管出血风险与SPSS类型之间存在相关性。我们得出结论,尽管存在大量SPSS,但肝硬化患者的出血风险不可预测,且他们常常需要手术治疗以预防再发。