Department of Social Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Economic Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, 586 01 Jihlava, Czech Republic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 23;18(23):12275. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312275.
The prevalence of inequalities in the general health position of communities can be assessed by using selected determinants. The aims of this article are three-fold: (1) to apply a comprehensive approach to the assessment of inequalities in the general health position of communities, (2) to determine the spatial differentiation of determinants, and (3) to present selected assessment methods and their impact on the results. To present a quantitative assessment of these inequalities in health status in communities, a composite indicator (Health Index) was developed. This Health Index is composed of 8 areas of evaluation and 60 indicators which include, amongst others, determinants of health status and healthcare at district level (LAU 1) in the Czech Republic. The data are evaluated using multicriteria decision-making methods (the WSA and TOPSIS methods). Findings suggest that, when all eight domains are assigned the same weight of one, the spatial differentiation among the districts is similar when using both methods. If different weightings are assigned to the districts, changes occur in both the index values and the rankings of the analyzed districts. For example, the allocation of weightings in both methods results in a rearrangement of the ranking of districts for which the Health Index is around the average.
社区一般健康状况不平等的流行程度可以通过选择的决定因素来评估。本文的目的有三个:(1)应用综合方法评估社区一般健康状况的不平等,(2)确定决定因素的空间差异,(3)介绍选择的评估方法及其对结果的影响。为了对社区健康状况的这些不平等进行定量评估,开发了一个综合指标(健康指数)。这个健康指数由 8 个评估领域和 60 个指标组成,其中包括捷克共和国地区一级(LAU1)的健康状况和医疗保健的决定因素等。使用多标准决策方法(WSA 和 TOPSIS 方法)对数据进行评估。结果表明,当所有八个领域的权重均为 1 时,使用这两种方法,地区之间的空间差异相似。如果对地区进行不同的加权,那么指数值和分析地区的排名都会发生变化。例如,在这两种方法中分配权重会导致健康指数接近平均值的地区排名重新排列。