Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, 412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 3;18(23):12779. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312779.
This study investigated the current design circumstances of an office as well as employees' perceptions of the office environment in relation to their perceived health, drawing on sense of coherence theory (comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness). Previous studies have related the physical office environment to employee health. However, most studies have focused on alleviating negative effects, while health-promoting potential, including employee sense of coherence, has been overlooked. This study adopted a mixed method case study approach, combining semi-structured interviews with employees, structured observations, and analysis of architectural drawings. The results indicated that employees' perceptions did not always align with the ideas behind the architectural design and that employees understood the environment differently. The study also highlighted the interrelations (and contradictions) among the different components of sense of coherence. The findings imply that organizations may need to prioritize which components of coherence should be supported most by the office environment. It also suggests that case-specific design aspects should play a more central role in studying and conceptualizing healthy office design and that design solutions should be continuously modified during the use phase, while ensuring employees' participation. The study concluded that an 'ideal' office environment should not be the goal. Instead, office design should provide an environment in which employees are able to cope with challenges in comprehensible, manageable and meaningful ways.
本研究以社会认知理论(可理解性、可管理性和意义)为基础,探讨了办公室的现有设计情况以及员工对办公环境的看法与他们对健康的感知之间的关系。先前的研究已经将物理办公环境与员工健康联系起来。然而,大多数研究都集中在减轻负面影响上,而忽略了健康促进的潜力,包括员工的社会认知感。本研究采用了混合方法案例研究方法,将员工的半结构化访谈、结构化观察和建筑图纸分析结合起来。结果表明,员工的看法并不总是与建筑设计背后的理念一致,而且员工对环境的理解也不同。研究还强调了社会认知感的不同组成部分之间的相互关系(和矛盾)。研究结果表明,组织可能需要优先考虑办公环境最需要支持的社会认知感的哪些组成部分。这也表明,在研究和概念化健康办公设计时,应更加重视具体案例的设计方面,并且应在使用阶段不断修改设计解决方案,同时确保员工的参与。研究得出的结论是,“理想”的办公环境不应是目标。相反,办公设计应为员工提供一个能够以可理解、可管理和有意义的方式应对挑战的环境。