School of Tourism and Hospitality Management, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China.
Department of Marketing, Events and Tourism, Greenwich Business School, University of Greenwich, London SE10 9SL, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 6;18(23):12850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312850.
This research analyzed the impact of environmental regulations and their power in suppressing tourism carbon emissions. The results showed that: (1) four types of environmental regulations had significant inhibiting effects on tourism carbon emissions, but different types of regulations had varying effects; and (2) environmental regulations had a significant time lag effect on tourism carbon emissions. The decay rates of the environmental regulation effects were dissimilar for supervisory management, market incentives, command and control, and public participation; and (3) environmental regulations had dissimilar influences on tourism carbon emissions at the regional level. Government agencies should choose differentiated environmental regulation tools, attach great importance to the time-lag effect of environmental regulations on tourism carbon emissions, and establish systems and mechanisms of public participation in environmental matters.
本研究分析了环境规制及其减排效力对旅游碳排放的影响。结果表明：（1）四类环境规制均对旅游碳排放有显著的抑制作用，但规制类型的不同导致抑制效果存在差异；（2）环境规制对旅游碳排放存在显著的时滞效应，且监管管理、市场激励、命令控制和公众参与四类环境规制工具的衰减率存在差异；（3）环境规制对旅游碳排放的影响在区域层面存在差异。政府部门应选择差异化的环境规制工具，重视环境规制对旅游碳排放的时滞效应，建立公众参与环境事务的制度和机制。
Zotero 插件