Benvenuti Stefano, Wang Chiuhui Mary, Borroni Simona
Fondazione Telethon, Milan, Italy.
Gruppo Famiglie DRAVET, Milan, Italy.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Nov 23;8:728529. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728529. eCollection 2021.
This paper presents the results of a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews of 10 expert patient advocates on several different issues around Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs). The interviews were conducted between February and May 2020 based on a guideline with a list of 8 topics that covered concerns about safety and ethics, access problems and limitations, pricing of ATMPs and educational needs for patient communities. Overall, the interviewees expressed a high degree of convergence of opinions on most of the topics and especially on the identification of the reasons for concern. Conversely, when asked about possible solutions, quite a wide range of solutions were proposed, although with many common points. However, it highlights that the debate is still in its infancy and that there are not yet consolidated positions across the whole community. A general concern emerging from all the interviews is the potential limitation of access to approved ATMPs, both due to the high prices and to the geographical concentration of treatment centers. However, patients recognize the value of a model with a limited number of specialized clinical centers administering these therapies. On the ethical side, patients do not show particular concern as long as ATMPs and the underlying technology is used to treat severe diseases. Finally, patients are asking for both more education on ATMPs as well as for a more continuous involvement of patient representatives in the whole "life-cycle" of a new ATMP, from the development phase to the authorization, from the definition of the reimbursement scheme to the collection of Real Word Data on safety and long-term efficacy of the treatment.
本文介绍了一项定性研究的结果,该研究基于对10位专业患者权益倡导者就先进治疗药品(ATMPs)的几个不同问题进行的半结构化访谈。访谈于2020年2月至5月期间进行,依据一份包含8个主题的指南,这些主题涵盖了对安全性和伦理、获取问题与限制、ATMPs定价以及患者群体教育需求的担忧。总体而言,受访者在大多数主题上,尤其是在担忧原因的认定上,意见高度一致。相反,当被问及可能的解决方案时,尽管有许多共同点,但提出了相当广泛的一系列解决方案。然而,这凸显出相关辩论仍处于初期阶段,整个群体尚未形成统一的立场。所有访谈中出现的一个普遍担忧是,由于价格高昂以及治疗中心的地理集中性,获批的ATMPs的获取可能受到限制。然而,患者认识到由少数专门临床中心管理这些疗法的模式的价值。在伦理方面,只要ATMPs及相关基础技术用于治疗严重疾病,患者就没有表现出特别的担忧。最后,患者既要求获得更多关于ATMPs的教育,也要求患者代表在新ATMP的整个“生命周期”中,从研发阶段到授权,从报销方案的确定到治疗安全性和长期疗效真实世界数据的收集,都能更持续地参与其中。