Periodontology Unit, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Centre for Oral, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Immunobiology & Regenerative Medicine and Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London (QMUL), London, United Kingdom.
Periodontology Unit, Centre for Host Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, Centre for Oral, London, United Kingdom; Centre for Immunobiology & Regenerative Medicine and Centre for Oral Clinical Research, Institute of Dentistry, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London (QMUL), London, United Kingdom.
J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103912. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103912. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
To compare the subgingival microbiota of patients with aggressive (AgP) or chronic periodontitis (CP) to healthy (H), non-periodontitis patients as well as to explore their relevant associations to different host genetic variants.
Following clinical examination, blood and subgingival plaque sampling of 471 study participants (125 AgP, 121 CP, 225 H), subgingival community analysis was performed by next generation sequencing of the 16S rRNA. Microbial data from 266 participants (75 AgP, 95 CP, 98 H) were available for analysis. SNPs in the IL6, IL6R and FTO gene were selected for genetic marker analyses.
Combined periodontitis patients (AgP + CP), particularly those classified with AgP, exhibited lower alpha- and beta- diversity. Several genera (including Peptostreptococcaceae, Filifactor, Desulfobulbus, Tannerella and Lachnospiracee) and species were over-abundant in combined periodontitis vs. healthy individuals, while other genera such as Prevotella or Dialister were found to be more abundant in healthy cases. The only genus with difference in abundance between AgP and CP was Granulicatella. No associations between IL6, IL6RA and FTO genetic variants and microbial findings were detected.
This study suggests that limited microbial differences existed between AgP and CP and challenges the current notion that periodontitis is associated with increased subgingival microbial diversity compared with periodontal health.
The findings of this study cast some doubts on the notion that the dysbiosis characteristic of periodontal disease is expressed as increased microbial diversity.
比较侵袭性牙周炎(AgP)或慢性牙周炎(CP)患者与健康(H)、非牙周炎患者的龈下微生物群,并探索其与不同宿主遗传变异的相关性。
对 471 名研究参与者(125 名 AgP、121 名 CP、225 名 H)进行临床检查、血液和龈下菌斑采样后,通过下一代测序对 16S rRNA 进行龈下群落分析。有 266 名参与者(75 名 AgP、95 名 CP、98 名 H)的微生物数据可用于分析。选择 IL6、IL6R 和 FTO 基因中的 SNPs 进行遗传标记分析。
联合牙周炎患者(AgP+CP),特别是那些被归类为 AgP 的患者,表现出较低的 alpha 和 beta 多样性。与健康个体相比,一些属(包括消化链球菌科、Filifactor、脱硫弧菌、坦纳拉菌和lachnospiracee)和物种在联合牙周炎中过度丰富,而其他属(如普雷沃菌或 Dialister)在健康病例中更为丰富。AgP 和 CP 之间丰度差异唯一的属是颗粒放线菌。未检测到 IL6、IL6RA 和 FTO 遗传变异与微生物发现之间存在关联。
本研究表明,AgP 和 CP 之间存在有限的微生物差异,这对目前认为与牙周健康相比,牙周炎与龈下微生物多样性增加相关的观点提出了挑战。
本研究的结果对牙周病特征性的生态失调表现为微生物多样性增加的观点提出了一些质疑。