Laurutis V P, Robinson D A
J Physiol. 1986 Apr;373:209-33. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016043.
Eye and head movements were recorded in normal humans during rapid refixations with the head still (saccades) or moving (gaze saccades) to determine if the vestibulo-ocular reflex was operating at such times. Subjects made self-electrooculogram for large saccades and with the eyecoil/magnetic field method for smaller movements. The putative function of the vestibulo-ocular reflex during a gaze saccade is to adjust the movement of the eye for the movement of the head by adding the saccadic command and the vestibular signal. This action, referred to here as linear summation, would maintain gaze-saccade accuracy by making gaze velocity (eye in space) independent of head velocity. It would also preserve the duration of the eye saccades of about 200 deg. When a subject increased his head velocity voluntarily, for example, from 420 to 805 deg/s, mean gaze velocity rose from 540 to 820 deg/s and duration dropped from 380 to 250 ms. Linear summation did not occur. By means of a yoke clenched in the teeth, the subject's head could be momentarily and unexpectedly slowed by collision of the yoke with a lead weight during a 180 deg gaze saccade. The perturbation decreased head velocity by about 150-200 deg/s, decreased gaze velocity by about the same amount and did not change eye velocity (in the head); another indication that the vestibulo-ocular reflex was not working. Nevertheless, gaze-saccade duration was automatically increased so that the over-all accuracy of the movement was not changed. Subjects made saccades between targets at +/- 20 deg without attempted head movements. Simultaneously the experimenter struck the yoke, clenched in the subject's teeth, with a rubber hammer. The hammer blow caused a transient head velocity of about 70 deg/s. Gaze velocity transiently rose or fell, depending on the direction of the blow, by similar amounts and a quantitative analysis suggested that the vestibulo-ocular reflex was essentially absent. Again, duration was automatically altered so that saccade accuracy was not changed. Subjects looked back and forth between targets 20, 40 and 60 deg apart as their head turned through the straight ahead position, actively or passively, at velocities up to 600 deg/s (active) or 300 deg/s (passive).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在正常人头部静止(扫视)或移动(注视扫视)时进行快速重新注视期间记录眼睛和头部运动,以确定此时前庭眼反射是否起作用。受试者在进行大幅度扫视时通过自发电眼图,对于较小幅度运动则采用眼线圈/磁场方法。在注视扫视期间,前庭眼反射的假定功能是通过将扫视指令和前庭信号相加来调整眼睛运动以适应头部运动。此处称为线性总和的这种作用,将通过使注视速度(空间中的眼睛)独立于头部速度来保持注视扫视的准确性。它还将保持约200度的眼扫视持续时间。例如,当受试者自愿提高头部速度,从420度/秒增加到805度/秒时,平均注视速度从540度/秒上升到820度/秒,持续时间从380毫秒下降到250毫秒。线性总和并未发生。通过咬紧牙关的轭,在180度注视扫视期间,轭与铅锤碰撞可使受试者头部瞬间意外减速。这种扰动使头部速度降低约150 - 200度/秒,使注视速度降低约相同幅度,并且不改变眼速度(相对于头部);这是前庭眼反射不起作用的另一个迹象。然而,注视扫视持续时间会自动增加,从而使运动的总体准确性不变。受试者在±20度的目标之间进行扫视,不尝试头部运动。同时,实验者用橡胶锤敲击受试者咬紧的轭。锤击导致约70度/秒的瞬时头部速度。注视速度根据敲击方向瞬时上升或下降类似幅度,定量分析表明基本上不存在前庭眼反射。同样,持续时间会自动改变,以使扫视准确性不变。当受试者的头部以高达600度/秒(主动)或300度/秒(被动)的速度主动或被动地转过正前方位置时,他们在相距20度、40度和60度的目标之间来回看。(摘要截于400字)