• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢替坦的β-内酰胺酶稳定性及体外活性;与其他8种β-内酰胺类抗生素及庆大霉素的比较。

The beta-lactamase stability and in vitro activity of cefotetan; a comparison with 8 other beta-lactam antibiotics and gentamicin.

作者信息

Friis H, Prag J, Togsverd E, Benzon M W

出版信息

Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1986 Aug;94(4):251-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03049.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03049.x
PMID:3489350
Abstract

The antibacterial activity of cefotetan, 8 other beta-lactam antibiotics and gentamicin, was tested in vitro on 288 recently isolated bacteria. The activity of cefotetan was generally higher than the 2.generation cephalosporin cefuroxime and lower than the 3.generation cephalosporins tested. In addition, cefotetan was shown to have some antibacterial activity against anaerobic bacteria. Cefotetan is a cephamycin and was found resistant to all 14 plasmid-mediated and 2 chromosomally-mediated beta-lactamases. With its beta-lactamase resistance and antibacterial activity, cefotetan seems to be a "second-generation-like" cephalosporin, almost with 3.generation cephalosporin antibacterial activity against Enterobacteriaceae.

摘要

在体外对288株近期分离出的细菌测试了头孢替坦、其他8种β-内酰胺类抗生素和庆大霉素的抗菌活性。头孢替坦的活性总体上高于第二代头孢菌素头孢呋辛,低于所测试的第三代头孢菌素。此外,头孢替坦显示出对厌氧菌有一定抗菌活性。头孢替坦是一种头霉素,对所有14种质粒介导的和2种染色体介导的β-内酰胺酶均耐药。凭借其对β-内酰胺酶的耐药性和抗菌活性,头孢替坦似乎是一种“类第二代”头孢菌素,几乎具有第三代头孢菌素对肠杆菌科细菌的抗菌活性。

相似文献

1
The beta-lactamase stability and in vitro activity of cefotetan; a comparison with 8 other beta-lactam antibiotics and gentamicin.头孢替坦的β-内酰胺酶稳定性及体外活性;与其他8种β-内酰胺类抗生素及庆大霉素的比较。
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1986 Aug;94(4):251-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03049.x.
2
Beta-lactamase stability and in vitro activity of aztreonam, with a comparison to 9 other beta-lactam antibiotics and gentamicin.氨曲南的β-内酰胺酶稳定性及体外活性,并与其他9种β-内酰胺类抗生素和庆大霉素进行比较。
Chemotherapy. 1986;32(4):329-35. doi: 10.1159/000238431.
3
The activity and beta-lactamase stability of cefotetan compared to other beta-lactam antibiotics.与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素相比,头孢替坦的活性及β-内酰胺酶稳定性。
Chemioterapia. 1985 Aug;4(4):271-7.
4
Cefotetan, a new cephamycin: comparison of in vitro antimicrobial activity with other cephems, beta-lactamase stability, and preliminary recommendations for disk diffusion testing.头孢替坦,一种新型头孢霉素:与其他头孢菌素的体外抗菌活性比较、β-内酰胺酶稳定性及纸片扩散法检测的初步建议
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Nov;22(5):859-77. doi: 10.1128/AAC.22.5.859.
5
Antimicrobial activity, beta-lactamase stability and beta-lactamase inhibition of cefotetan and other 7-alpha-methoxy beta-lactam antimicrobials.头孢替坦及其他7-α-甲氧基β-内酰胺类抗菌药物的抗菌活性、β-内酰胺酶稳定性及β-内酰胺酶抑制作用
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1983 Mar;1(1):71-83. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(83)90035-4.
6
Antibacterial activity of the cephamycin cefotetan: an in-vitro comparison with other beta-lactam antibiotics.头孢美唑头孢替坦的抗菌活性:与其他β-内酰胺类抗生素的体外比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983 Jan;11 Suppl:67-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/11.suppl_a.67.
7
[Mechanisms of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae towards beta-lactamase antibiotics].[肠杆菌科细菌对β-内酰胺酶抗生素的耐药机制]
Acta Med Croatica. 2004;58(4):307-12.
8
Beta-lactamase stability of temocillin.替莫西林的β-内酰胺酶稳定性
Drugs. 1985;29 Suppl 5:64-6. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198500295-00013.
9
Beta-lactamase stability and antibacterial activity of cefpirome alone and in combination with other antibiotics.头孢匹罗单独及与其他抗生素联合使用时的β-内酰胺酶稳定性及抗菌活性。
Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1989;15(10):477-82.
10
Comparative activity of cefotetan against plasmid-encoded aminoglycoside-resistant enterobacteria strains.头孢替坦对质粒编码的氨基糖苷类耐药肠杆菌菌株的比较活性。
Chemioterapia. 1988 Aug;7(4):267-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-agent prophylaxis with cefotetan in colorectal surgery.结直肠手术中使用头孢替坦进行单药预防。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Feb;8(2):174-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01963908.