Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 10;11(1):628. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01740-w.
Loneliness is a relatively common problem in young people (14-24 years) and predicts the onset of depression and anxiety. Interventions to reduce loneliness thus have significant potential as active ingredients in strategies to prevent or alleviate anxiety and depression among young people. Previous reviews have focused on quantitative evidence and have not examined potential mechanisms that could be targets for intervention strategies. To build on this work, in this review we aimed to combine qualitative and quantitative evidence with stakeholder views to identify interventions that appear worth testing for their potential effectiveness in reducing loneliness, anxiety and depression in young people aged 14-24 years, and provide insights into the potential mechanisms of action. We conducted a Critical Interpretative Synthesis, a systematic review method that iteratively synthesises qualitative and quantitative evidence and is explicitly focused on building theory through a critical approach to the evidence that questions underlying assumptions. Literature searches were performed using nine databases, and eight additional databases were searched for theses and grey literature. Charity and policy websites were searched for content relevant to interventions for youth loneliness. We incorporated elements of Rapid Realistic Review approaches by consulting with young people and academic experts to feed into search strategies and the resulting conceptual framework, in which we aimed to set out which interventions appear potentially promising in terms of theoretical and empirical underpinnings and which fit with stakeholder views. We reviewed effectiveness data and quality ratings for the included randomised controlled trials only. Through synthesising 27 studies (total participants n = 105,649; range 1-102,072 in different studies) and grey literature, and iteratively consulting with stakeholders, a conceptual framework was developed. A range of 'Intrapersonal' (e.g. therapy that changes thinking and behaviour), 'Interpersonal' (e.g. improving social skills), and 'Social' Strategies (e.g. enhancing social support, and providing opportunities for social contact) seem worth testing further for their potential to help young people address loneliness, thereby preventing or alleviating depression and/or anxiety. Such strategies should be co-designed with young people and personalised to fit individual needs. Plausible mechanisms of action are facilitating sustained social support, providing opportunities for young people to socialise with peers who share similar experiences, and changing thinking and behaviour, for instance through building positive attitudes to themselves and others. The most convincing evidence of effectiveness was found in support of Intrapersonal Strategies: two randomised controlled studies quality-rated as 'good' found decreases in loneliness associated with different forms of therapy (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy or peer network counselling), although power calculations were not reported, and effect sizes were small or missing. Strategies to address loneliness and prevent or alleviate anxiety and depression need to be co-designed and personalised. Promising elements to incorporate into these strategies are social support, including from peers with similar experiences, and psychological therapy.
孤独感在年轻人(14-24 岁)中较为常见,并且可以预测抑郁和焦虑的发生。因此,减少孤独感的干预措施具有重要的潜在意义,可作为预防或减轻年轻人焦虑和抑郁的积极因素。先前的综述侧重于定量证据,而没有研究可能成为干预策略目标的潜在机制。为了在此基础上更进一步,在本次综述中,我们旨在结合定性和定量证据以及利益相关者的观点,确定哪些干预措施可能具有减轻 14-24 岁年轻人孤独感、焦虑和抑郁的潜力,并深入了解潜在的作用机制。我们进行了批判性综合,这是一种系统综述方法,可迭代地综合定性和定量证据,并且通过对潜在假设进行批判性分析来明确构建理论。文献检索使用了九个数据库,另外还检索了八个数据库的论文和灰色文献。慈善和政策网站也搜索了与青年孤独感干预措施相关的内容。我们通过与年轻人和学术专家进行咨询,将快速现实综述方法的要素纳入到搜索策略和由此产生的概念框架中,我们旨在根据理论和经验基础以及与利益相关者的观点,确定哪些干预措施具有潜在的前景。我们仅对纳入的随机对照试验进行了有效性数据和质量评级的回顾。通过综合 27 项研究(总参与者 n=105649;不同研究中范围为 1-102072)和灰色文献,并与利益相关者进行迭代咨询,我们制定了一个概念框架。一系列“内在”(例如改变思维和行为的疗法)、“人际”(例如提高社交技能)和“社会”策略(例如增强社会支持和提供社交机会)似乎值得进一步研究,以评估它们帮助年轻人解决孤独感、从而预防或减轻抑郁和/或焦虑的潜力。此类策略应与年轻人共同设计,并根据个人需求进行个性化定制。作用机制可能包括维持持久的社会支持、为年轻人提供与具有相似经历的同龄人交往的机会、改变思维和行为,例如通过建立对自己和他人的积极态度。最有说服力的有效性证据支持内在策略:两项质量评定为“良好”的随机对照研究发现,不同形式的治疗(认知行为疗法或同伴网络咨询)与孤独感的降低有关,尽管未报告功效计算,并且效应大小较小或缺失。解决孤独感以及预防或减轻焦虑和抑郁的策略需要共同设计和个性化定制。有前途的元素包括社交支持,包括来自具有相似经历的同龄人,以及心理治疗。