• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吸烟状况与投票意向的关联:2015-2020 年英格兰的横断面调查。

Association between cigarette smoking status and voting intentions: Cross sectional surveys in England 2015-2020.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, UK.

Population Health Sciences Institute, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12304-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-12304-4
PMID:34895194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8665625/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cigarette smoking takes place within a cultural and social context. Political views and practices are an important part of that context. To gain a better understanding of smoking, it may be helpful to understand its association with voting patterns as an expression of the political views and practices of the population who smoke. This study aimed to assess the association between cigarette smoking and voting intentions and to examine how far any association can be explained by sociodemographic factors and alcohol use.

METHODS

Pooled monthly representative repeat cross-sectional household surveys of adults (16+) in England (N = 55,482) between 2015 and 2020 were used to assess the association between cigarette smoking status and voting intentions, and whether this was accounted for by age, occupational grade, gender, region and alcohol use. Voting intention was measured by asking 'How would you vote if there were a General Election tomorrow?' Respondents chose from a list of the major English political parties or indicated their intention not to vote.

RESULTS

In adjusted multinomial regression, compared with intending to vote Conservative (majority party of government during the period), being undecided (aOR1.22 [1.13-1.33] <0.001), intending to vote Labour (aOR1.27 [1.16-1.36] <0.001), to vote "Other" (aOR1.54 [1.37-1.72] <0.001), or not to vote (aOR1.93 [1.77-2.11] <0.001) was associated with higher odds of current relative to never smoking rates. Intending to vote for the Liberal Democrats was associated with a significant lower odds of current smoking prevalence (aOR0.80 [0.70-0.91] <0.001) compared with intending to vote Conservative.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlling for a range of other factors, current as compared with never-smokers appear more likely to intend not to vote, to be undecided, to vote for Labour or a non-mainstream party, and less likely to vote for the Liberal Democrats, compared with the Conservative party.

摘要

背景和目的

吸烟发生在文化和社会背景下。政治观点和实践是该背景的重要组成部分。为了更好地了解吸烟,了解其与投票模式的关系,即吸烟人群的政治观点和实践的表达,可能会有所帮助。本研究旨在评估吸烟与投票意向之间的关联,并研究这种关联在多大程度上可以用社会人口因素和酒精使用来解释。

方法

本研究使用了 2015 年至 2020 年间在英格兰进行的每月代表性重复横断面家庭调查(共 55482 名成年人),以评估吸烟状况与投票意向之间的关联,以及这种关联是否可以用年龄、职业等级、性别、地区和酒精使用来解释。投票意向是通过询问“如果明天举行大选,你会投票吗?”来衡量的。受访者从英国主要政党的名单中选择,或表示他们不打算投票。

结果

在调整后的多项二项式回归中,与打算投票给保守党(在此期间为政府的多数党)相比,未决定(优势比 1.22[1.13-1.33],<0.001)、打算投票给工党(优势比 1.27[1.16-1.36],<0.001)、投票给“其他”(优势比 1.54[1.37-1.72],<0.001)或不投票(优势比 1.93[1.77-2.11],<0.001)与更高的当前相对从不吸烟率相关。与打算投票给保守党相比,打算投票给自由民主党与当前吸烟率显著降低相关(优势比 0.80[0.70-0.91],<0.001)。

结论

在控制了一系列其他因素后,与从不吸烟者相比,当前吸烟者更有可能选择不投票、未决定、投票给工党或非主流政党,而不太可能投票给保守党。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0c/8665625/6a302edc628f/12889_2021_12304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0c/8665625/848c86e43b28/12889_2021_12304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0c/8665625/6a302edc628f/12889_2021_12304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0c/8665625/848c86e43b28/12889_2021_12304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b0c/8665625/6a302edc628f/12889_2021_12304_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between cigarette smoking status and voting intentions: Cross sectional surveys in England 2015-2020.吸烟状况与投票意向的关联:2015-2020 年英格兰的横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 11;21(1):2254. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12304-4.
2
Smoking status and voting behaviour and intentions in countries of the former Soviet Union.前苏联国家的吸烟状况、投票行为及意向。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95632-4.
3
Political voting in the United Kingdom 2019 general election and risk of living with obesity in a nationally representative sample.2019 年英国大选的政治投票与全国代表性样本中肥胖风险的关系。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Oct;48(10):1430-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01569-5. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
4
Examining Pediatric Residency Voting Practices.考察儿科住院医师投票实践。
South Med J. 2021 Jan;114(1):13-16. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001191.
5
Analysis of Ohio Nurses' Voting Behaviors 2020-2023.2020 - 2023年俄亥俄州护士投票行为分析
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2025 May;26(2):89-96. doi: 10.1177/15271544241298259. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
6
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
7
Moral Foundations and Voting Intention in Italy.意大利的道德基础与投票意向
Eur J Psychol. 2017 Nov 30;13(4):667-687. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1391. eCollection 2017 Nov.
8
Where there's smoke there's money: tobacco industry campaign contributions and U.S. Congressional voting.有烟的地方就有钱:烟草行业的竞选捐款与美国国会投票
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Dec;27(5):363-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.08.014.
9
Smoking and (Not) Voting: The Negative Relationship Between a Health-Risk Behavior and Political Participation in Colorado.吸烟与(不)投票:科罗拉多州一种健康风险行为与政治参与之间的负相关关系
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Mar;18(3):371-6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv098. Epub 2015 May 8.
10
Predictors of state legislators' intentions to vote for cigarette tax increases.州立法者投票支持提高香烟税意图的预测因素。
Prev Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;27(2):157-65. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0308.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations of Body Mass Index and Lifestyle Factors with Suicidal Ideation, Planning, and Attempts Among Korean Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Study.韩国青少年中体重指数和生活方式因素与自杀意念、计划及行为的关联:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;13(12):1470. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121470.
2
Smoking status and voting behaviour and intentions in countries of the former Soviet Union.前苏联国家的吸烟状况、投票行为及意向。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 24;15(1):14308. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95632-4.
3
Trusting information on cancer varies by source of information and political viewpoint.

本文引用的文献

1
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.
2
Changes in smoker characteristics in England between 2008 and 2017.2008 年至 2017 年期间英格兰烟民特征的变化。
Addiction. 2020 Apr;115(4):748-756. doi: 10.1111/add.14882. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Health as an independent predictor of the 2017 French presidential voting behaviour: a cross-sectional analysis.健康是 2017 年法国总统选举行为的独立预测因素:一项横断面分析。
人们对癌症信息的信任程度因信息来源和政治观点而异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Jan;35(1):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01786-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):1468. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7861-3.
4
Insufficient sleep reduces voting and other prosocial behaviours.睡眠不足会减少投票和其他亲社会行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 May;3(5):492-500. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0543-4. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
5
A cross sectional survey of smoking characteristics and quitting behaviour from a sample of homeless adults in Great Britain.英国无家可归成年人样本的吸烟特征和戒烟行为的横断面调查。
Addict Behav. 2019 Aug;95:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
6
Stop smoking services: BMJ analysis shows how councils are stubbing them out.戒烟服务:《英国医学杂志》分析揭示地方议会如何取缔这些服务。
BMJ. 2018 Aug 24;362:k3649. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3649.
7
Deconstructing the Alcohol Harm Paradox: A Population Based Survey of Adults in England.剖析酒精危害悖论:一项基于英格兰成年人的人口调查。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 28;11(9):e0160666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160666. eCollection 2016.
8
Unravelling the alcohol harm paradox: a population-based study of social gradients across very heavy drinking thresholds.解析酒精危害悖论:一项基于人群的、针对重度饮酒阈值社会梯度的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 19;16:599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3265-9.
9
A cross-sectional analysis of the relationship between tobacco and alcohol outlet density and neighbourhood deprivation.烟草与酒精销售点密度和社区贫困之间关系的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Oct 5;15:1014. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2321-1.
10
Smoking and (Not) Voting: The Negative Relationship Between a Health-Risk Behavior and Political Participation in Colorado.吸烟与(不)投票:科罗拉多州一种健康风险行为与政治参与之间的负相关关系
Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Mar;18(3):371-6. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv098. Epub 2015 May 8.