• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生态系统服务付费(PES)模型的福州市区域生态补偿核算。

Regional ecological compensation accounting in Fuzhou City based on a payment for ecosystem services (PES)model.

机构信息

Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.

University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3805-3814. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.009.

DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.009
PMID:34898096
Abstract

The determination of regional ecological compensation quota and spatial selection are key issues in the study of horizontal transfer payment ecological compensation mechanism. Taking 12 districts of Fuzhou City as the basic research unit, we accounted the ecological function values of forest, grassland, wetland, agriculture, and marine ecosystems in 2015 and 2018. Combined with local economic development situation, we constructed an ecological compensation model. With this model, we determined the ecological compensation quota and spatial distribution of different ecosystems in various districts and counties of Fuzhou. The results showed that from 2015 to 2018, Gulou District had the largest ecological payment, with 36.384 billion yuan, followed by Mawei, Cangshan and Jin'an districts, with 7.809, 6.974 and 6.669 billion yuan, respectively. Luoyuan County and Taijiang District had lower payment, which were 2.942 and 1.903 billion yuan respectively. Among the areas requiring ecological compensation, Lianjiang County and Changle District had high compensation quotas, being 25.120 and 20.261 billion yuan, followed by Yongtai County (12.570 billion yuan). The compensation amounts in Minhou County, Fuqing City and Minqing County were less than 10 billion yuan. The distribution of ecological compensation differed across various ecosystems. In general, the main ecological compensation areas of forest, grassland, wetland and agriculture ecosystem were in Yongtai, Minqing, Minhou, Lianjiang and Luoyuan counties. The compensation amounts were 2.424-31.379 billion yuan in forest, 1.181-20.708 billion yuan in grassland, 1.015-45.493 billion yuan in wetland, and 5.780-23.954 billion yuan in cropland. The main regions that need compensation for marine ecosystem were Lianjiang County, Changle District, and Fuqing City, with the amount of compensation being 8.216-47.854 billion yuan. The results could properly reflect the coordinated development of regional ecological and economic conditions, which could provide a reference for the improvement of the ecological compensation mechanism in Fuzhou City.

摘要

区域生态补偿标准的确定和空间选择是横向转移支付生态补偿机制研究的关键问题。以福州市 12 个区为基本研究单元,核算了 2015 年和 2018 年森林、草地、湿地、农业和海洋生态系统的生态功能价值。结合当地经济发展情况,构建了生态补偿模型。利用该模型,确定了福州市各区县不同生态系统的生态补偿标准和空间分布。结果表明,2015 年至 2018 年,鼓楼区生态支付额最大,为 363.84 亿元,其次是马尾区、仓山区和晋安区,分别为 78.09 亿元、69.74 亿元和 66.69 亿元。罗源县和台江区支付额较低,分别为 29.42 亿元和 19.03 亿元。在需要生态补偿的地区中,连江县和长乐区补偿额较高,分别为 251.20 亿元和 202.61 亿元,其次是永泰县(125.70 亿元)。闽侯县、福清市和闽清县的补偿金额均不足 100 亿元。各生态系统的生态补偿分布不均。总体上,森林、草地、湿地和农业生态系统的主要生态补偿区为永泰、闽清、闽侯、连江和罗源县,补偿金额分别为 24.24 亿元至 313.79 亿元、1.181 亿元至 20.708 亿元、1.015 亿元至 454.93 亿元、5.780 亿元至 23.954 亿元。海洋生态系统需要补偿的主要地区是连江县、长乐区和福清市,补偿金额分别为 82.16 亿元至 478.54 亿元。结果能够适当反映区域生态经济条件的协调发展,可为完善福州市生态补偿机制提供参考。

相似文献

1
Regional ecological compensation accounting in Fuzhou City based on a payment for ecosystem services (PES)model.基于生态系统服务付费(PES)模型的福州市区域生态补偿核算。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3805-3814. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.009.
2
Accounting for the cost of ecological degradation in Fuzhou City, China.核算中国福州市生态退化成本。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3781-3792. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202100.000.
3
Gross economic-ecological product accounting of Fuzhou City, China.中国福州市总经济-生态产品核算。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3793-3804. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.015.
4
Wetland ecosystem service function and its value accounting:A case study of Fuzhou City, China.湿地生态系统服务功能及其价值核算:以福州市为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3824-3834. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.017.
5
Accounting of gross ecosystem product in Fuzhou City,China.中国福州市的总生态系统产品核算。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3835-3844. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018.
6
[Evaluation of climate regulation service at prefecture-level city: A case study of Fuzhou City, China].[地级市气候调节服务评估:以中国福州市为例]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Jul;33(7):1966-1974. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202207.021.
7
Changes in gross ecosystem product and its response to land use changes in forest resource dominant regions: A case study of Zixi County, Jiangxi Province, China.森林资源主导区域总生态系统产品变化及其对土地利用变化的响应:以江西省资溪县为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Aug;35(8):2197-2205. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202408.020.
8
Using Ecosystem Service Flows to Inform Ecological Compensation: Theory & Application.利用生态系统服务流动来提供生态补偿:理论与应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 11;17(9):3340. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093340.
9
The payment scheme for ecosystem services in the coastal city based on the ecosystem services value and current payment efficiency: a case study in Jimo of Qingdao city, China.基于生态系统服务价值和现行支付效率的沿海城市生态系统服务付费模式:以中国青岛市即墨区为例
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(32):49179-49193. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19321-9. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
10
Inter-regional ecological compensation in the Yellow River Basin based on the value of ecosystem services.基于生态系统服务价值的黄河流域跨区域生态补偿
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:116073. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116073. Epub 2022 Aug 29.