• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术在低危子宫内膜癌中的长期肿瘤安全性是否也适用于高中危患者?一项多中心土耳其妇科肿瘤学组对 2745 例子宫内膜癌病例进行的研究。(TRSGO-End-001)。

Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).

机构信息

Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Çukurova University, Adana 01380, Turkey.

Gynecologic Oncology Department, Medical Faculty, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2021 Oct 29;28(6):4328-4340. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060368.

DOI:10.3390/curroncol28060368
PMID:34898563
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8628704/
Abstract

This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high-intermediate- and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high-intermediate- and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases.

摘要

本研究旨在比较 2016 年 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 风险分类系统指导下的开腹手术和腹腔镜手术治疗子宫内膜癌的长期肿瘤学结果,特别关注中高危和高危类别。使用 2005 年 1 月至 2016 年 1 月的多中心数据库,根据手术途径(开腹手术与腹腔镜手术)比较了 2745 例子宫内膜癌病例的无病生存率和总生存率。根据 2016 年 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 风险分类系统,将中高危和高危患者定义为,并分析其生存率差异。在 2745 例患者中,1743 例(63.5%)接受开腹手术,其余接受腹腔镜手术。开腹组中高危和高危子宫内膜癌病例总数为 734 例(45%),腹腔镜组为 307 例(30.7%)。在低危、中危、中高危和高危子宫内膜癌中,腹腔镜组与开腹组相比,无病生存率和总生存率无统计学差异。总之,无论子宫内膜癌的风险类别如何,腹腔镜手术的长期肿瘤学结果都与开腹手术相当。我们的研究结果令人鼓舞,可以考虑对中高危和高危子宫内膜癌病例进行腹腔镜手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5a/8628704/2cd7c71d9c4e/curroncol-28-00368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5a/8628704/2cd7c71d9c4e/curroncol-28-00368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad5a/8628704/2cd7c71d9c4e/curroncol-28-00368-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001).腹腔镜手术在低危子宫内膜癌中的长期肿瘤安全性是否也适用于高中危患者?一项多中心土耳其妇科肿瘤学组对 2745 例子宫内膜癌病例进行的研究。(TRSGO-End-001)。
Curr Oncol. 2021 Oct 29;28(6):4328-4340. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28060368.
2
Long-term outcome of patients with intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer after pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: a comparison of laparoscopic vs. open procedure.中高危子宫内膜癌患者盆腔和腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术后的长期结局:腹腔镜与开放手术的比较。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;146(4):961-969. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03122-8. Epub 2020 Jan 4.
3
[Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].[早期子宫内膜癌腹腔镜手术后短期和长期结局的比较]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Dec;50(12):902-9.
4
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
5
Surgical outcomes among elderly women with endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy: a NRG/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗老年子宫内膜癌女性的手术结局:一项NRG/妇科肿瘤学组研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;218(1):109.e1-109.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.026. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
6
Laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: long-term results of a multicentric study.子宫内膜癌的腹腔镜手术:一项多中心研究的长期结果
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002;23(4):305-10.
7
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12(9):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub2.
8
Laparoscopic treatment of endometrial cancer: systematic review.腹腔镜治疗子宫内膜癌:系统评价。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):413-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术用于疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者手术分期的比较:日本的现状
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019.
10
Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.接受计算机辅助(“机器人”)和标准腹腔镜手术治疗新发子宫内膜癌患者的术后疼痛药物需求。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(11):3561-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3064-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Surgical Approach on Endometrial Cancer Survival According to ESMO/ESGO Risk Classification: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in the Northern Italian Region.根据ESMO/ESGO风险分类,手术方式对子宫内膜癌生存的影响:意大利北部地区的一项回顾性多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 7;17(13):2261. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132261.
2
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Endometrial Cancer: Superior for Low-Risk and Comparable for High-Risk Cases in a 20-Year Cohort Study.子宫内膜癌的微创手术:20年队列研究表明,对低风险患者更具优势,对高风险患者效果相当
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2025 May 19;85(7):724-735. doi: 10.1055/a-2589-0498. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of minimally invasive surgery with laparotomic approach in the treatment of high risk endometrial cancer: A systematic review.微创与开腹手术治疗高危子宫内膜癌的比较:系统评价。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;46(5):782-788. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.519. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for low, intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术治疗低危、中危和高危子宫内膜癌。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Mar;30(2):e24. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e24. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for surgical staging of patients with presumed low-risk endometrial cancer: The current state of Japan.
腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术用于疑似低风险子宫内膜癌患者手术分期的比较:日本的现状
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;58(1):99-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.019.
4
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
5
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 31;10(10):CD006655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006655.pub3.
6
Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.非子宫内膜样腺癌患者行微创子宫切除术的应用及效果。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):463.e1-463.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.在国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)中心进行的子宫内膜癌的微创子宫切除术手术率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Mar;148(3):480-484. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
8
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Pelvic/Aortic Lymph Node Dissection for Endometrial Cancer Using Passive Instrument Positioners: A Retrospective Case-Control Series.采用被动器械定位器的子宫内膜癌全腹腔镜子宫切除术伴盆腔/主动脉淋巴结清扫术:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jul-Aug;25(5):800-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
9
Effect of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy vs Total Abdominal Hysterectomy on Disease-Free Survival Among Women With Stage I Endometrial Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜全子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌无病生存的效果比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Mar 28;317(12):1224-1233. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2068.
10
Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?II型子宫内膜癌的微创治疗方法:明智且安全吗?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 5.