• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The contribution of form repetition to listeners' expectation of givenness in online reference resolution.形式重复对在线指称消解中听众既定感期望的贡献。
Discourse Process. 2021;58(9):820-836. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2021.1954831. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
2
Eye see what you're saying: Contrastive use of beat gesture and pitch accent affects online interpretation of spoken discourse.眼看出你所言:打拍子手势和音高重音的对比使用影响口语话语的在线解读。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Sep;47(9):1494-1526. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000986. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Contrast Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Infelicitous Beat Gesture Increases Cognitive Load During Online Spoken Discourse Comprehension.旁观者眼中的对比:不恰当的节奏手势会增加在线口语理解中的认知负荷。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;44(10):e12912. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12912.
4
Cognitive Modeling of Individual Variation in Reference Production and Comprehension.指称生成与理解中个体差异的认知建模
Front Psychol. 2016 Apr 7;7:506. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00506. eCollection 2016.
5
Rational Redundancy in Referring Expressions: Evidence from Event-related Potentials.关联电位研究中的指称表达的合理冗余:证据。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Dec;45(12):e13071. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13071.
6
The effect of repetition on pronoun resolution in patients with memory impairment.重复对记忆障碍患者代词消解的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Mar;42(2):171-184. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1699503. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.你知道吗?在线参考解析中共同基础的即时使用的 ERP 证据。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:275-285. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
8
The influence of speaker gaze on listener comprehension: contrasting visual versus intentional accounts.说话者注视对听众理解的影响:对比视觉与意图性解释。
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):317-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
9
Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.利用韵律推断人工耳蜗使用者和听力正常的听众的话语突出度。
Cognition. 2017 Sep;166:184-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.029. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
10
Referential Form and Memory for the Discourse History.指代形式与话语历史记忆。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Apr;45(4):e12964. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12964.

本文引用的文献

1
On the Nature of the Word-Reduction Phenomenon: The Contribution of Bilingualism.论词汇缩减现象的本质:双语的作用
Brain Sci. 2019 Oct 27;9(11):294. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9110294.
2
Repetition reduction during word and concept overlap in bilinguals.双语者在单词和概念重叠时的重复减少现象。
J Mem Lang. 2015 Oct 1;84:88-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.005.
3
When overlap leads to competition: Effects of phonological encoding on word duration.当重叠导致竞争:语音编码对单词时长的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1701-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0828-1.
4
Repetition reduction: lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition.重复减少:在不存在所指重复的情况下的词汇重复。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 May;40(3):829-43. doi: 10.1037/a0035780. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
5
Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.重复很容易:为什么重复的指称物的突出程度降低了。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):1137-46. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.1137.
6
Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.视觉世界范式的统计与计算模型:生长曲线与个体差异
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):475-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006.
7
THE BACON not the bacon: how children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases.“培根”而非熏猪肉:儿童与成人如何理解带重音和不带重音的名词短语。
Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):69-99. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
8
The unintelligibility of speech to children: effects of referent availability.
J Child Lang. 1994 Oct;21(3):623-48. doi: 10.1017/s030500090000948x.
9
Intonational marking of given and new information: some consequences for comprehension.
Mem Cognit. 1983 Jan;11(1):64-76. doi: 10.3758/bf03197663.
10
Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Mar;16(2):250-7. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.16.2.250.

形式重复对在线指称消解中听众既定感期望的贡献。

The contribution of form repetition to listeners' expectation of givenness in online reference resolution.

作者信息

Lee Eun-Kyung, Lam Tuan Q, Watson Duane G

机构信息

Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Loyola University New Orleans.

出版信息

Discourse Process. 2021;58(9):820-836. doi: 10.1080/0163853x.2021.1954831. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1080/0163853x.2021.1954831
PMID:34898762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8659410/
Abstract

Although it is clear that unaccented referring expressions are associated with given information in a discourse (Dahan et al., 2002), it is less clear what aspects of givenness are relevant. We examine whether listeners' expectation of givenness depends on repetition of a referring expression or on contextual evocation of a referent. The results from two visual world eye-tracking experiments suggest that for interpretation, listeners associated reduced prominence with a repeated referring expression. Listeners expect previously evoked referents to be candidates for reduced referring expressions only when they are referred to with the exact same referential form. The data also suggest that when referents are referred to with different referential forms across utterances, accenting facilitates linking those forms for co-reference.

摘要

虽然很明显,在话语中无重音的指代表达与已知信息相关联(达汉等人,2002年),但不太清楚已知性的哪些方面是相关的。我们研究了听众对已知性的期望是取决于指代表达的重复还是取决于所指对象的语境唤起。两项视觉世界眼动追踪实验的结果表明,在解释过程中,听众将重复的指代表达与较低的显著性联系起来。只有当先前唤起的所指对象以完全相同的指称形式被提及时,听众才会期望它们成为简化指代表达的候选对象。数据还表明,当所指对象在不同话语中以不同的指称形式被提及时,重读有助于将这些形式联系起来以实现共指。