• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychosocial Challenges in Palliative Care: Bridging the Gaps Using Digital Health.姑息治疗中的社会心理挑战:利用数字健康弥合差距
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):442-447. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_381_20. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Building Bridges for "Palliative Care-in-Place": Development of a mHealth Intervention for Informal Home Care.为“就地姑息治疗”搭建桥梁:开发一种用于非正式家庭护理的移动健康干预措施。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:862347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862347. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychosocial interventions for informal caregivers of people living with cancer.针对癌症患者非正式照护者的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 17;6(6):CD009912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009912.pub2.
5
The impact of digital health interventions on the psychological outcomes of patients and families receiving paediatric palliative care: A systematic review and narrative synthesis.数字健康干预对接受儿科姑息治疗的患者和家庭的心理结局的影响:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;35(10):2017-2023. doi: 10.1177/02692163211026523. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
6
Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: a review of the descriptive psychosocial literature.癌症患者家庭照护者在姑息治疗、临终关怀和丧亲阶段:描述性心理社会文献综述。
Palliat Support Care. 2011 Sep;9(3):315-25. doi: 10.1017/S1478951511000265.
7
What are the digitally enabled psychosocial interventions delivered by trained practitioners being offered to adults with life-shortening illnesses and palliative care needs and their informal and professional caregivers? A scoping review.训练有素的从业者提供给生命有限的疾病和姑息治疗需求的成年人及其非正式和专业护理者的数字赋能心理社会干预措施有哪些? 范围综述。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Aug;21(4):727-740. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523000172.
8
A Digital Mobile Community App for Caregivers in Singapore: Predevelopment and Usability Study.一款面向新加坡护理人员的数字移动社区应用程序:开发前与可用性研究。
JMIR Nurs. 2021 May 26;4(2):e25679. doi: 10.2196/25679. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
9
Sharing is Caring: Minimizing the Disruption with Palliative Care.分享即关怀:通过姑息治疗将干扰降至最低。
Cureus. 2018 Mar 13;10(3):e2321. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2321.
10
[Palliative care in the cardiac setting: a consensus document of the Italian Society of Cardiology/Italian Society of Palliative Care (SIC/SICP)].[心脏疾病中的姑息治疗:意大利心脏病学会/意大利姑息治疗学会(SIC/SICP)共识文件]
G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2019 Jan;20(1):46-61. doi: 10.1714/3079.30720.

引用本文的文献

1
Social support and depressive symptoms in older adults receiving hospice care: the mediating role of developmental task attainment.接受临终关怀的老年人的社会支持与抑郁症状:发展任务达成的中介作用。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Jul 18;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01841-z.
2
Investigating the Multidomain Impact of Palliative Care on End-of-Life Patients: A Comprehensive Evaluation.探究姑息治疗对临终患者的多领域影响:一项综合评估。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Jan 13;2025:4203906. doi: 10.1155/tswj/4203906. eCollection 2025.
3
Understanding and Addressing Mental Health Disparities and Stigma in Serious Illness and Palliative Care.理解并解决重症疾病和姑息治疗中的心理健康差异与污名问题。
Illn Crises Loss. 2025 Jan;33(1):109-129. doi: 10.1177/10541373231201952. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
4
Core components of end-of-life care in nursing education programs: a scoping review.护理教育项目临终关怀的核心内容:范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Mar 28;23(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01398-3.
5
COVID-19 and the current state of palliative care in the United States.2019冠状病毒病与美国姑息治疗的现状
Health Promot Perspect. 2022 Dec 10;12(3):273-276. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.34. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Applications of GIS and geospatial analyses in COVID-19 research: A systematic review.GIS 和地理空间分析在 COVID-19 研究中的应用:系统评价。
F1000Res. 2020 Nov 27;9:1379. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.27544.2. eCollection 2020.
2
Burnout among healthcare providers during COVID-19: Challenges and evidence-based interventions.COVID-19 期间医疗保健提供者的倦怠:挑战和基于证据的干预措施。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2020 Oct-Dec;V(4):1-6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2020.73.
3
Leveraging GIS and spatial analysis for informed decision-making in COVID-19 pandemic.利用地理信息系统(GIS)和空间分析在新冠疫情中进行明智决策。
Health Policy Technol. 2021 Mar;10(1):7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
4
Epidemiology of mental health problems in COVID-19: a review.2019冠状病毒病心理健康问题的流行病学:综述
F1000Res. 2020 Jun 23;9:636. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24457.1. eCollection 2020.
5
Digital health innovation to integrate palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间整合姑息治疗的数字健康创新。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:664-666. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
6
Prevalence and Psychosocial Correlates of Mental Health Outcomes Among Chinese College Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic.新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情期间中国大学生心理健康状况的患病率及其社会心理相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 7;11:803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00803. eCollection 2020.
7
Air pollution and geriatric mental health: perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic.空气污染与老年心理健康:关于新冠疫情的观点
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Oct;32(10):1255-1256. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220001428. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
8
Barriers to home-based palliative care in people with cancer: A qualitative study of the perspective of caregivers.癌症患者居家姑息治疗的障碍:一项关于照护者观点的定性研究
Nurs Open. 2020 Apr 22;7(4):1260-1268. doi: 10.1002/nop2.503. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Prevalence of mental disorders among people who are homeless: An umbrella review.无家可归人群中心境障碍的患病率:一项伞式综述。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;66(6):528-541. doi: 10.1177/0020764020924689. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Geriatric Care during Public Health Emergencies: Lessons Learned from Novel Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic.突发公共卫生事件期间的老年护理:从新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行中汲取的经验教训
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2020 May-Jun;63(4):257-258. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1746723. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

姑息治疗中的社会心理挑战:利用数字健康弥合差距

Psychosocial Challenges in Palliative Care: Bridging the Gaps Using Digital Health.

作者信息

Sultana Abida, Tasnim Samia, Sharma Rachit, Pawar Priyanka, Bhattcharya Sudip, Hossain Md Mahbub

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, EviSyn Health, Khulna, Bangladesh.

Department of Health Promotion and Community Health Sciences, Texas A&M University, Texas, United States.

出版信息

Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Jul-Sep;27(3):442-447. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_381_20. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.25259/IJPC_381_20
PMID:34898939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8655652/
Abstract

Psychosocial health is a major palliative care concern globally. Patients and caregivers engaged in palliative care may experience deteriorated mental and social health conditions. Global evidence informs a high burden of depression, anxiety, psychological distress and other mental health problems among the palliative care populations. Those challenges aggravate the preexisting palliative care issues, such as lack of access and suboptimal quality of care. Palliative caregiving, both in the institutional and community settings, should be strengthened, incorporating psychosocial support for the patients and their caregivers. The recent advancements in digital health technologies have shown promising impacts in facilitating health communication, decision-making and delivering psychosocial interventions using digital devices and platforms. Adopting evidence-based interventions can help the users to access mental health resources and communicate with each other to promote shared decision-making and management of health problems. Health-care organisations and systems may explore opportunities to advance psychosocial care using digital technologies. Leveraging advanced technologies in palliative caregiving may require multifaceted research exploring potential barriers and opportunities at the user, institutional and systems levels. Nonetheless, palliative care policies and health systems measures should be strengthened to develop and implement digital support systems that may improve psychosocial health and overall palliative care outcome.

摘要

心理社会健康是全球姑息治疗关注的一个主要问题。参与姑息治疗的患者和照护者可能会出现精神和社会健康状况恶化的情况。全球证据表明,姑息治疗人群中抑郁症、焦虑症、心理困扰和其他心理健康问题的负担很重。这些挑战加剧了现有的姑息治疗问题,如获得治疗的机会不足和护理质量欠佳。无论是在机构环境还是社区环境中,都应加强姑息照护,为患者及其照护者提供心理社会支持。数字健康技术的最新进展在促进健康沟通、决策以及使用数字设备和平台提供心理社会干预方面显示出了有前景的影响。采用循证干预措施可以帮助用户获取心理健康资源并相互交流,以促进共同决策和健康问题的管理。医疗保健组织和系统可以探索利用数字技术推进心理社会护理的机会。在姑息照护中利用先进技术可能需要多方面的研究,探索用户、机构和系统层面的潜在障碍和机会。尽管如此,应加强姑息治疗政策和卫生系统措施,以开发和实施可能改善心理社会健康和总体姑息治疗结果的数字支持系统。