Abu Hasheesh Mohammad O
Basic Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Isra University, Amman, Jordan.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2025 Jan 13;2025:4203906. doi: 10.1155/tswj/4203906. eCollection 2025.
Palliative care is recognized for its holistic approach in improving the quality of life for patients and their families, focusing on pain relief, symptom management, and addressing emotional, social, and spiritual needs. However, the field is evolving due to increasing demand for these specialized services, emphasizing the need for the ongoing research into palliative care practices. Is to investigate the multidomain impact of palliative care on end-of-life patients and evaluate their effectiveness on these domains. A quantitative descriptive design was adopted for conducting the current study. Approval obtained from a designated hospital in Amman, Jordan, and official permission to carry out the study. The study's participants consisted primarily of physicians and nurses who were involved in providing care to terminally ill patients. The research tool employed in this study is a standardized palliative care assessment that was used in Australia, with modifications based on the literature review. The validity and reliability of the adapted tool have been ensured through rigorous testing procedures. Findings indicated that the implementation of standardized practical palliative care exhibited an average level across all domains, specifically, the spiritual domain received the highest mean score (1.80), while the structural domain had the lowest (1.69). There were significant differences in palliative care provision across specialized work sites, with radiotherapy and blood disease sites scoring higher ( = 2.04 and = 1.87, respectively). Educational levels significantly influenced care perceptions, favoring BSc holders. Age did not significantly affect palliative care provision, probably because of standardized care protocols and sample size. In addition, nurses rated palliative care higher than physicians, likely due to their more direct patient involvement. In light of the results, it is evident that there is a pressing need to consistently evaluate the healthcare services offered to meet the needs of the increasing population of terminally ill patients.
姑息治疗因其在改善患者及其家庭生活质量方面的整体方法而受到认可,专注于缓解疼痛、症状管理以及满足情感、社会和精神需求。然而,由于对这些专业服务的需求不断增加,该领域正在不断发展,这凸显了对姑息治疗实践进行持续研究的必要性。目的是调查姑息治疗对临终患者的多领域影响,并评估其在这些领域的有效性。本研究采用定量描述性设计。获得了约旦安曼一家指定医院的批准以及开展该研究的官方许可。该研究的参与者主要是参与为绝症患者提供护理的医生和护士。本研究采用的研究工具是一种在澳大利亚使用的标准化姑息治疗评估工具,并根据文献综述进行了修改。通过严格的测试程序确保了改编工具的有效性和可靠性。研究结果表明,标准化实用姑息治疗在所有领域的实施水平均处于平均水平,具体而言,精神领域的平均得分最高(1.80),而结构领域得分最低(1.69)。不同专业工作场所的姑息治疗提供情况存在显著差异,放疗和血液疾病场所得分较高(分别为2.04和1.87)。教育水平对护理认知有显著影响,本科学历者更受青睐。年龄对姑息治疗的提供没有显著影响,可能是由于标准化的护理方案和样本量。此外,护士对姑息治疗的评分高于医生,这可能是因为他们与患者的接触更直接。根据研究结果,显然迫切需要持续评估所提供的医疗服务,以满足日益增加的绝症患者群体的需求。