Normen Michelle, Sahaya Femil E, Kulkarni Kshitija, Vidhubala E, Shewade Hemant D, Kathiresan Jeyashree
Department of Psycho-Oncology Services, Cytecare Cancer Hospitals, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Fenivi Research Solutions, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2021 Oct-Dec;27(4):561-570. doi: 10.25259/IJPC_142_21. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Routine screening for distress is a guideline prescribed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to adequately assess distress in a cancer setting. Our centre conducted routine screening but failed to utilize psycho-oncology services. Our aim was to assess the extent of self-reported distress, referrals to psycho-oncology services and healthcare provider perspectives about the existing distress management system and psycho-oncology services.
We conducted a record review of adult patients (n=372) who reported to the Out-patient department of the tertiary cancer centre. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fourteen healthcare providers. We used a concurrent mixed methods study design. Adult patients were screened for distress using NCCN-Distress Thermometer and problem checklist. Healthcare providers from different oncology specialties were interviewed and the data was analysed using descriptive thematic analysis.
Patients screened for distress were found to report moderate to extreme levels of distress (53.5%). The total referrals to psycho-oncology support services were low (8.6%). Interviews with healthcare providers revealed three major themes: Enablers, barriers and solutions for utilization of distress management system and psycho-oncology services.
Moderate to extreme distress was found among patients routinely screened for distress, although there was poor utilization of distress management system and psycho-oncology support services due to time constraints, patient's negative attitudes towards mental health referrals, generic screening tools and use of own clinical judgement to make referrals by healthcare providers. Future research warrants implementation of strategies to integrate psycho-oncology services into routine cancer care by focusing on improving visibility of services.
对痛苦进行常规筛查是美国国立综合癌症网络(NCCN)规定的一项指南,用于在癌症背景下充分评估痛苦程度。我们中心进行了常规筛查,但未能利用心理肿瘤学服务。我们的目的是评估自我报告的痛苦程度、转介至心理肿瘤学服务的情况以及医疗服务提供者对现有痛苦管理系统和心理肿瘤学服务的看法。
我们对向三级癌症中心门诊部报告的成年患者(n = 372)进行了记录审查。对14名医疗服务提供者进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用了同步混合方法研究设计。使用NCCN痛苦温度计和问题清单对成年患者进行痛苦筛查。对来自不同肿瘤学专业的医疗服务提供者进行了访谈,并使用描述性主题分析对数据进行了分析。
接受痛苦筛查的患者中,报告有中度至极度痛苦的比例为53.5%。转介至心理肿瘤学支持服务的总数较低(8.6%)。对医疗服务提供者的访谈揭示了三个主要主题:痛苦管理系统和心理肿瘤学服务利用的促进因素、障碍和解决方案。
在接受常规痛苦筛查的患者中发现了中度至极度痛苦,尽管由于时间限制、患者对心理健康转介的消极态度、通用筛查工具以及医疗服务提供者使用自己的临床判断进行转介,痛苦管理系统和心理肿瘤学支持服务的利用率较低。未来的研究有必要实施相关策略,通过关注提高服务的可见性,将心理肿瘤学服务纳入常规癌症护理。