• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为应对新冠疫情放宽远程医疗堕胎的监管障碍

Easing of Regulatory Barriers to Telemedicine Abortion in Response to COVID-19.

作者信息

Skuster Patty, Dhillon Jina, Li Jessica

机构信息

Temple University Beasley School of Law, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Ipas, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Nov 24;2:705611. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.705611. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2021.705611
PMID:34901929
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8652224/
Abstract

For many people seeking abortion during the continuing COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine abortion is the safest and most acceptable method, posing lower risk of exposure to the virus. In addition, by reducing in-person visits with health care providers, increased use of telemedicine for abortion can reduce pressure on overburdened health systems. Given the benefits of telemedicine during the pandemic, government agencies in several countries took measures to temporarily allow telemedicine abortion. We conducted key-word English-language searches to identify examples of government action to remove regulatory barriers to the practice of telemedicine abortion in response to the pandemic. We found instances of government agencies in eight countries taking steps to ease regulatory barriers to telemedicine abortion. Telemedicine abortion is safe, cost-effective, and may be the preferred method of abortion during acute periods of COVID-19 transmission, as well as after the pandemic has abated. As one step to expanding access to abortion with medicine where abortion is legal, health agencies and other regulatory bodies can take steps to remove barriers specific to telemedicine abortion.

摘要

对于许多在持续的新冠疫情期间寻求堕胎的人来说,远程医疗堕胎是最安全且最可接受的方法,感染病毒的风险较低。此外,通过减少与医疗服务提供者的面对面就诊,增加远程医疗在堕胎方面的使用可以减轻不堪重负的医疗系统的压力。鉴于疫情期间远程医疗的益处,几个国家的政府机构采取措施临时允许远程医疗堕胎。我们进行了英文关键词搜索,以找出政府采取行动消除远程医疗堕胎实践监管障碍以应对疫情的例子。我们发现八个国家的政府机构采取措施放宽对远程医疗堕胎的监管障碍。远程医疗堕胎是安全、具有成本效益的,并且在新冠病毒传播急性期以及疫情缓解后可能是首选的堕胎方式。作为在堕胎合法的地方扩大药物堕胎可及性的一步,卫生机构和其他监管机构可以采取措施消除远程医疗堕胎特有的障碍。

相似文献

1
Easing of Regulatory Barriers to Telemedicine Abortion in Response to COVID-19.为应对新冠疫情放宽远程医疗堕胎的监管障碍
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Nov 24;2:705611. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.705611. eCollection 2021.
2
Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis.新冠疫情期间八个欧洲国家对自我管理的在线远程医疗流产的需求:回归不连续分析。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;47(4):238-245. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200880. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
3
The perspective of Canadian health care professionals on abortion service during the COVID-19 pandemic.加拿大医疗保健专业人员对 COVID-19 大流行期间堕胎服务的看法。
Fam Pract. 2021 Aug 27;38(Suppl 1):i30-i36. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmab083.
4
"It was close enough, but it wasn't close enough": A qualitative exploration of the impact of direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion on access to abortion care.“差一点,但又差一点”:直接面向患者的远程医疗流产对堕胎护理可及性影响的定性研究。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.028. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
5
Abortion as an Essential Health Service in Latin America During the COVID-19 Pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,堕胎作为拉丁美洲一项基本医疗服务。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Aug 1;3:898754. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.898754. eCollection 2022.
6
Changes to medication abortion clinical practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.药物流产临床实践因应 COVID-19 大流行而作出的改变。
Contraception. 2021 Jul;104(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
7
State and federal abortion restrictions increase risk of COVID-19 exposure by mandating unnecessary clinic visits.州和联邦的堕胎限制通过强制要求不必要的诊所就诊,增加了 COVID-19 暴露的风险。
Contraception. 2020 Dec;102(6):385-391. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
8
Abortion service availability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a national census of abortion facilities in the U.S.新冠疫情期间美国堕胎服务的可及性:美国堕胎机构全国普查结果
Contracept X. 2021;3:100067. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2021.100067. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses.COVID-19 大流行时代的欧洲堕胎法规:政策应对的范围。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;47(4):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200724. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
10
The case for the use of telehealth for abortion in India.印度使用远程医疗进行堕胎的案例。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):1920566. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1920566.

引用本文的文献

1
Medication abortion during the COVID-19 pandemic in France: A research based on the French national health insurance database.COVID-19 大流行期间法国的药物流产:基于法国国家健康保险数据库的研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 7;19(2):e0295336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295336. eCollection 2024.
2
Japan's approval of oral abortion pills: A new era of opportunities and challenges in aligning with global standards.日本批准口服堕胎药:与全球标准接轨的机遇与挑战新时代。
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231216533. doi: 10.1177/17455057231216533.
3
Challenges to the implementation of telemedicine in abortion care for victims of sexual violence in Brazil.巴西为性暴力受害者提供堕胎护理时远程医疗实施面临的挑战。
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Dec 7;3:902390. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.902390. eCollection 2022.
4
Disruptions to the procurement of medical abortion medicines during COVID-19: a scoping review.COVID-19 期间药物流产药品供应中断:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e064848. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064848.
5
Medical abortion through telehealth in India: a critical perspective.印度通过远程医疗进行药物流产:批判性视角
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(2):2107090. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2107090.
6
Policy surveillance for a global analysis of national abortion laws.全球各国堕胎法律分析的政策监测。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2022 Dec;30(1):2064208. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2064208.

本文引用的文献

1
Early abortion care during the COVID-19 public health emergency in Ireland: Implications for law, policy, and service delivery.爱尔兰 COVID-19 公共卫生紧急事件期间的早期堕胎护理:对法律、政策和服务提供的影响。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Aug;154(2):379-384. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13720. Epub 2021 May 18.
2
Just allocation of COVID-19 vaccines.2019冠状病毒病疫苗的合理分配
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004812.
3
Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Related to COVID-19.与新冠病毒相关的种族和族裔健康差异
JAMA. 2021 Feb 23;325(8):719-720. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26443.
4
Global Developments in Laws on Induced Abortion: 2008-2019.2008 - 2019年全球人工流产法律的发展情况
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Dec 1;46(Suppl 1):53-65. doi: 10.1363/46e0920.
5
COVID-19 impact in abortions' practice, a regional French evaluation.COVID-19 对堕胎实践的影响,法国区域性评估。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):102038. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102038. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
6
2020 developments in the provision of early medical abortion by telemedicine in the UK.2020 年在英国通过远程医疗提供早期药物流产服务的发展情况。
Health Policy. 2021 Jan;125(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.11.006. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
7
Abortion regulation in Europe in the era of COVID-19: a spectrum of policy responses.COVID-19 大流行时代的欧洲堕胎法规:政策应对的范围。
BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021 Oct;47(4):e14. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200724. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Abortion experiences and preferences of transgender, nonbinary, and gender-expansive people in the United States.美国跨性别、非二元性别和性别扩展者的堕胎经历和偏好。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):376.e1-376.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.035. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
9
Legal and policy responses to the delivery of abortion care during COVID-19.在 COVID-19 期间提供堕胎护理的法律和政策应对措施。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;151(3):479-486. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13377. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
COVID-19 has "devastating" effect on women and girls.新冠疫情对妇女和女童产生了“毁灭性”影响。
Lancet. 2020 Aug 1;396(10247):301-302. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31679-2.