Department of Orthodontics, Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, India.
Department of Radio-Diagnosis, Kamineni Institute of Medical Sciences, Sreepuram, Narketpally, India.
Dent Med Probl. 2021 Oct-Dec;58(4):499-508. doi: 10.17219/dmp/132390.
Orthodontic treatment with fixed mechanotherapy using appliances and permanent retainers bonded after treatment is a routine procedure performed in clinical dentistry. Patients with braces or retainers sometimes need to undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for various reasons. Radiologists do not know the exact impact of the materials used in orthodontics on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of different types of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans.
Twenty patients with bonded brackets (stainless steel buccal/labial, stainless steel lingual, ceramic self-ligating with metal slots, ceramic, and polycarbonate) and 18 patients with bonded fixed retainers (titanium, fiber-reinforced composite, multi-stranded stainless steel, and different combinations of permanent retainers) participated in the study. The same adhesive was used for bonding. Cranial MRI scans of 6 regions were acquired for each subject, using a 1.5T MAGNETOM machine. Six radiologists evaluated the images and provided scores based on the modified receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of distortion. The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess differences between the materials and the anatomic sites with regard to the distortion rating scale. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was applied to establish the interrater reliability.
A statistically significant difference was found between stainless steel brackets (both buccal/ labial and lingual) and all other experimental materials in terms of mean distortion scores (p = 0.020 or p = 0.024). The interrater reliability proved to be high.
Stainless steel buccal/labial and lingual brackets caused maximum distortion of the images, which became non-diagnostic; hence, such brackets should be removed before MRI. Ceramic and polycarbonate brackets as well as fiber-reinforced composite retainers did not distort the images; thus, they need not be removed. Ceramic self-ligating brackets with metal slots, titanium retainers, multi-stranded stainless steel retainers, and combinations of fixed retainers caused minimal distortion; however, the images were still diagnostic. Hence, patients using these materials may not need to have them removed before MRI.
使用正畸固定矫治器和治疗后粘结的永久性保持器进行正畸治疗是临床牙科中的常规程序。由于各种原因,戴牙套或保持器的患者有时需要进行磁共振成像(MRI)检查。放射科医生不知道正畸中使用的材料对 MRI 扫描诊断图像质量的确切影响。
本研究旨在评估不同类型的正畸托槽和永久性保持器对 MRI 扫描诊断图像质量的影响。
本研究纳入 20 名粘结托槽(不锈钢颊/唇侧、不锈钢舌侧、带金属槽的陶瓷自锁、陶瓷和聚碳酸酯)和 18 名粘结固定保持器(钛、纤维增强复合材料、多股不锈钢和不同组合的永久性保持器)的患者。所有患者均使用相同的粘结剂粘结。使用 1.5T MAGNETOM 机器对每个受试者的 6 个区域进行颅 MRI 扫描。6 名放射科医生根据失真的改良接收者操作特征(ROC)分析对图像进行评估并提供评分。使用配对 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验评估材料与解剖部位之间在失真评分方面的差异。应用 Cohen's kappa 系数(κ)评估组内可靠性。
不锈钢托槽(颊/唇侧和舌侧)与所有其他实验材料之间的平均失真评分存在统计学差异(p=0.020 或 p=0.024)。组内可靠性很高。
不锈钢颊/唇侧和舌侧托槽导致图像失真最大,图像变得无法诊断;因此,此类托槽应在 MRI 检查前移除。陶瓷和聚碳酸酯托槽以及纤维增强复合材料保持器不会使图像失真,因此无需移除。带金属槽的陶瓷自锁托槽、钛保持器、多股不锈钢保持器和固定保持器的组合引起最小的失真,但图像仍具有诊断价值。因此,使用这些材料的患者可能不需要在 MRI 检查前将其移除。