• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用法律影响主流医学和法律思维:“超适应证”使用一拳致伤法律和拳击概念。

Co-opting Laws to Influence Prevailing Medical and Legal Thinking: "Off-Label" Conceptual Use of One-Punch Laws and Boxing.

机构信息

Safeguarding Office, Salesians of Don Bosco, Australia-Pacific Province.

出版信息

J Law Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):1066-1081.

PMID:34907686
Abstract

The law shapes the disposition and actions of persons, and what is acceptable and ethical in a community. However, laws in society can potentially be co-opted to influence medical and legal thought in other areas, using an "off-label" conceptual interpretation. For example, medical authorities have recognised the dangers of blows to the head in boxing, with some being fatal. Elsewhere, recent criminal law target assaults causing death by one punch. These laws, alongside coronial inquests, can be helpful in shifting the outlook on boxing, its risks, and fatalities. The cause of both forms of deaths usually involves traumatic brain injuries. This article analyses the contexts surrounding one-punch laws, and some legal proceedings and coroners' inquests, to seek alternative perspectives and the medical and ethical implications of such laws. The discussions also refer to legislation, and socio-legal and medical ethics debates in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States.

摘要

法律塑造了个人的性格和行为,以及在一个社区中什么是可接受和合乎道德的。然而,社会中的法律可能会被利用,通过“超说明书使用”的概念解释来影响医学和法律领域的其他方面的思想。例如,医学权威已经认识到拳击运动中头部受到打击的危险,其中一些是致命的。在其他地方,最近的刑法将导致一拳致死的攻击定为犯罪。这些法律,以及验尸官的调查,可以帮助改变对拳击、其风险和死亡的看法。这两种形式的死亡通常涉及创伤性脑损伤。本文分析了一拳致死法律以及一些法律程序和验尸官调查的背景,以寻求替代视角,以及这些法律的医学和伦理影响。讨论还涉及英国、欧洲和美国的立法以及社会法律和医学伦理辩论。

相似文献

1
Co-opting Laws to Influence Prevailing Medical and Legal Thinking: "Off-Label" Conceptual Use of One-Punch Laws and Boxing.利用法律影响主流医学和法律思维:“超适应证”使用一拳致伤法律和拳击概念。
J Law Med. 2021 Dec;28(4):1066-1081.
2
Coroners' Inquests and Criminal and Disciplinary Law.死因裁判官审讯及刑事和纪律法。
J Law Med. 2023 Jul;30(2):259-277.
3
"Blowed off by a side wind"? Coronial inquests following criminal acquittals.“被一阵侧风吹走了”?刑事无罪判决后的死因裁判庭调查。
J Law Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):595-608.
4
Legal aid for coroners' inquests.死因裁判官审讯的法律援助。
J Law Med. 2008 Feb;15(4):587-601.
5
Executive impunity and parallel justice? The United Kingdom debate on secret inquests and inquiries.行政豁免权与并行司法?英国关于秘密死因调查和调查的辩论。
J Law Med. 2012 Mar;19(3):569-92.
6
Factors predicting coroners' decisions to hold discretionary inquests.预测验尸官决定进行自由裁量调查的因素。
CMAJ. 2012 Mar 20;184(5):521-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110865. Epub 2012 Jan 30.
7
The privilege against self-incrimination in coroners' inquests.死因裁判法庭调查中反对自证其罪的特权。
J Law Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):491-505.
8
[Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].[法庭上的神经科学:从责任到危险性,法国新法律引发的伦理问题]
Encephale. 2015 Oct;41(5):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Coronial law and practice: a human rights perspective.死因裁判庭法律与实践:人权视角
J Law Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):584-601.
10
Unlawful killing at inquests: Clarity or confusion?死因研讯中的非法杀人:是清晰还是混淆?
Med Leg J. 2022 Dec;90(4):230-233. doi: 10.1177/00258172221099080. Epub 2022 Jun 13.