• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫苗分配与认可中的政治因素

The Politics of Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution and Recognition.

作者信息

Ashraf Muhammad Adil, Muhammad Ameer, Shafiq Yasir

机构信息

VITAL Pakistan Trust, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Public Health Rev. 2021 Oct 29;42:1604343. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2021.1604343. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/phrs.2021.1604343
PMID:34909236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8589007/
Abstract

With COVAX touted as the only platform that is built on equity and fairness, there is growing discontent and concern that the platform is falling short of its goals as COVID ravages across multiple countries. There are two serious issues that we address here. Firstly, COVID distribution principles and mechanisms need to be rethought in terms of a shift from private to global interests with a focus on prioritizing deliveries. Secondly, with multiple vaccines present, it is vital that countries recognize all of them, once proven safe and effective, to prevent any form of vaccine apartheid and discrimination.

摘要

由于COVAX被吹捧为唯一基于公平和公正构建的平台,随着新冠疫情在多个国家肆虐,人们越来越不满和担忧该平台未能实现其目标。我们在此要解决两个严重问题。首先,新冠疫苗分配原则和机制需要重新思考,要从关注私利转向关注全球利益,并将重点放在优先配送上。其次,由于存在多种疫苗,各国必须认可所有经证明安全有效的疫苗,以防止任何形式的疫苗种族隔离和歧视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384f/8589007/0a8c6e37a85c/phrs-42-1604343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384f/8589007/0a8c6e37a85c/phrs-42-1604343-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/384f/8589007/0a8c6e37a85c/phrs-42-1604343-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Politics of Covid-19 Vaccine Distribution and Recognition.新冠疫苗分配与认可中的政治因素
Public Health Rev. 2021 Oct 29;42:1604343. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2021.1604343. eCollection 2021.
2
COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity.新冠疫苗全球获取机制、疫苗捐赠与全球疫苗不平等的政治问题
Global Health. 2022 Mar 5;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00801-z.
3
State capture through indemnification demands? Effects on equity in the global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.通过赔偿要求进行的国家俘获?对新冠疫苗全球分配公平性的影响。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022 Aug 19;15(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00442-y.
4
Uneven power dynamics must be levelled in COVID-19 vaccines access and distribution.在新冠疫苗的获取和分配方面,不均衡的权力动态必须得到平衡。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021 Nov;2:100096. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100096. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
5
COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and the failure of global cooperation.新冠疫苗种族隔离与全球合作的失败
Br J Polit Int Relat. 2023 Aug;25(3):535-554. doi: 10.1177/13691481231178248. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Prioritizing 'equity' in COVID-19 vaccine distribution through Global Health Diplomacy.通过全球卫生外交在新冠疫苗分配中优先考虑“公平”。
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Aug 18;11(3):281-287. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.36. eCollection 2021.
7
Recalling the universal health coverage vision and equity in the COVID-19 vaccine distribution plan.回顾《新冠疫苗分配计划中的全民健康覆盖愿景和公平性》。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Jul 13;39:197. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.197.29041. eCollection 2021.
8
Hard choices: Ethical challenges in phase 1 of COVID-19 vaccine roll-out in South Africa.艰难的选择:南非 COVID-19 疫苗推广第一阶段的伦理挑战。
S Afr Med J. 2021 Mar 26;111(6):554-558.
9
Tuberculosis结核病
10
The Inefficient and Unjust Global Distribution of COVID-19 Vaccines: From a Perspective of Critical Global Justice.《COVID-19 疫苗在全球分配中效率低下且不公平:从批判全球正义的视角》。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211060992. doi: 10.1177/00469580211060992.

引用本文的文献

1
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccination worldwide: WORLDCOV, a retrospective observational study.全球 COVID-19 疫苗接种的决定因素:回顾性观察研究 WORLDCOV。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 31;11:1128612. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1128612. eCollection 2023.
2
Engaging stakeholders to identify gaps and develop strategies to inform evidence use for health policymaking in Nigeria.让利益相关者参与进来,以确定差距,并制定战略,为尼日利亚的卫生决策制定提供循证依据。
Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Nov 15;43:140. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.140.36754. eCollection 2022.
3
Between rules and resistance: moving public health emergency responses beyond fear, racism and greed.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology, not geopolitics, should guide COVID-19 vaccine donations.应该由流行病学,而非地缘政治,来指导新冠疫苗捐赠。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 10;398(10295):97-99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01323-4. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
2
A matter of priority: equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines.优先事项:公平获取新冠疫苗。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Mar 13;151:w20488. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.20488. eCollection 2021 Mar 1.
3
International Collaboration to Ensure Equitable Access to Vaccines for COVID-19: The ACT-Accelerator and the COVAX Facility.
在规则与抵制之间:推动公共卫生应急响应超越恐惧、种族主义和贪婪。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Dec;7(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009945.
4
Availability and prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccines among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and kidney failure during the height of the pandemic: a global survey by the International Society of Nephrology.在大流行高峰期,患有晚期慢性肾脏病和肾衰竭的患者中 COVID-19 疫苗的供应和优先排序:国际肾脏病学会的全球调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 30;12(12):e065112. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065112.
5
Preparedness for Future Pandemics: Lessons Learned From the COVID-19 Pandemic in Iran.对未来大流行的防范:从伊朗的新冠疫情中吸取的教训。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jun 29;67:1605094. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1605094. eCollection 2022.
国际合作确保公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗:ACT-Accelerator 和 COVAX 设施。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):426-449. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12503. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
An ethical framework for global vaccine allocation.全球疫苗分配的伦理框架。
Science. 2020 Sep 11;369(6509):1309-1312. doi: 10.1126/science.abe2803. Epub 2020 Sep 3.