• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多焦点 Acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT 人工晶状体植入术患者既往角膜屈光手术后 IOL 计算公式的准确性:基于 SS-OCT 的生物测量仪比较。

Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Quadrifocal Acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT Implantation in Patients With Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery: Comparison of SS-OCT-Based Biometers.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2021 Dec;37(12):836-841. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210812-02. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20210812-02
PMID:34914552
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas from two biometers using swept-source optical coherence tomography for quadrifocal Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL (Alcon Laboratories, Inc) implantation in patients with visually significant cataract with previous corneal refractive surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study comprised 50 eyes from 50 patients with a history of corneal refractive surgery and TFNT IOL implantation. Candidate formulas were Shammas-PL and Barrett True-K in the Argos (Movu, Inc), Barret True-K and Haigis-L in the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), and Haigis using the total keratometry (TK) mode in the IOLMaster 700. The main outcome measure was the mean absolute error (MAE) detected at postoperative 6 months. The refractive accuracy was also evaluated as number and percentage of eyes within ±0.25, ±0.50, and ±0.75 diopters (D) of the prediction error.

RESULTS

The uncorrected distance and near visual acuity were 0.32 ± 0.34 and 0.46 ± 0.20 logMAR at baseline, and significantly improved to 0.04 ± 0.07 and 0.03 ± 0.06 logMAR at postoperative 6 months ( < .001 for all analysis) with a mean spherical equivalent of -0.20 ± 0.39 D. The MAE was smallest for the Barrett True-K formula in the IOLMaster 700 (0.36 ± 0.26 D) and largest for the Shammas-PL formula in the Argos (0.59 ± 0.37 D). The Barrett True-K formula from both devices showed that 90% of eyes were within ±0.75 D of MAE.

CONCLUSIONS

The visual and refractive outcomes of TFNT IOL implantation in patients with previous corneal refractive surgery were favorable. The Barrett True-K formula in the IOLMaster 700 showed the best refractive outcome for TFNT IOL implantation. .

摘要

目的

评估使用扫频源光学相干断层扫描对先前接受过角膜屈光手术的视力显著白内障患者进行四焦点 Acrysof IQ Panoptix TFNT IOL(Alcon Laboratories, Inc.)植入术后,两种生物测量仪的眼内晶状体(IOL)计算公式的准确性。

方法

这项回顾性研究共纳入 50 例(50 只眼)曾接受过角膜屈光手术和 TFNT IOL 植入术的患者。候选公式包括 Argos(Movu, Inc.)中的 Shammas-PL 和 Barrett True-K、IOLMaster 700(Carl Zeiss Meditec AG)中的 Barret True-K 和 Haigis-L 以及 IOLMaster 700 中的总角膜曲率(TK)模式中的 Haigis。主要观察指标为术后 6 个月时的平均绝对误差(MAE)。还评估了预测误差在±0.25、±0.50 和±0.75 屈光度(D)范围内的眼数和百分比,以评估屈光准确性。

结果

在基线时,未矫正的远距和近距视力分别为 0.32 ± 0.34 和 0.46 ± 0.20 logMAR,术后 6 个月时显著改善至 0.04 ± 0.07 和 0.03 ± 0.06 logMAR(所有分析均<.001),平均等效球镜度为-0.20 ± 0.39 D。IOLMaster 700 中的 Barrett True-K 公式的 MAE 最小(0.36 ± 0.26 D),Argos 中的 Shammas-PL 公式的 MAE 最大(0.59 ± 0.37 D)。两种设备的 Barrett True-K 公式均显示 90%的眼在 MAE 的±0.75 D 范围内。

结论

先前接受过角膜屈光手术的患者植入 TFNT IOL 后的视力和屈光结果良好。IOLMaster 700 中的 Barrett True-K 公式在 TFNT IOL 植入方面显示出最佳的屈光结果。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Quadrifocal Acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT Implantation in Patients With Previous Corneal Refractive Surgery: Comparison of SS-OCT-Based Biometers.多焦点 Acrysof IQ PanOptix TFNT 人工晶状体植入术患者既往角膜屈光手术后 IOL 计算公式的准确性:基于 SS-OCT 的生物测量仪比较。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Dec;37(12):836-841. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210812-02. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
Accuracy of intraocular lens formulas using total keratometry in eyes with previous myopic laser refractive surgery.在有既往近视激光屈光手术史的眼中,使用总角膜曲率计的人工晶状体公式的准确性。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Jun;35(6):1705-1711. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01159-5. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
3
[Accuracy comparison of total keratometry and standard keratometry in intraocular lens power calculations for post-corneal refractive surgery cataract patients].[角膜屈光手术后白内障患者人工晶状体屈光度计算中总角膜曲率计与标准角膜曲率计的准确性比较]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Aug 11;60(8):689-694. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240301-00090.
4
Accuracy of Total Corneal Power Calculation for Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation: Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometer vs Scheimpflug Tomographer.多焦点散光型人工晶状体植入术的总角膜功率计算的准确性:扫频源 OCT 生物测量仪与 Scheimpflug 断层扫描仪的比较。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Oct;37(10):686-692. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20210610-01. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
5
Comparison of the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas for eyes after corneal refractive surgery.角膜屈光手术后眼睛人工晶状体屈光力计算公式准确性的比较。
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Jul;8(14):871. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-4624.
6
Comparison of Intraoperative Aberrometry, OCT-Based IOL Formula, Haigis-L, and Masket Formulae for IOL Power Calculation after Laser Vision Correction.激光矫正视力后,比较术中像差、OCT 公式、Haigis-L 公式和 Masket 公式在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的应用。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1096-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.01.027. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
7
Evaluation of Different IOL Calculation Formulas of the ASCRS Calculator in Eyes After Corneal Refractive Laser Surgery for Myopia With Multifocal IOL Implantation.在接受角膜屈光性激光近视手术并植入多焦点人工晶状体的眼中,评估ASCRS计算器的不同人工晶状体计算公式。
J Refract Surg. 2019 Jan 1;35(1):54-59. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20181119-01.
8
Comparison of Newer Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Methods for Eyes after Corneal Refractive Surgery.角膜屈光手术后眼睛新型人工晶状体屈光力计算方法的比较
Ophthalmology. 2015 Dec;122(12):2443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.08.037. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
9
Accuracy of Intraoperative Aberrometry, Barrett True-K With and Without Posterior Cornea Measurements, Shammas-PL, and Haigis-L Formulas After Myopic Refractive Surgery.准分子激光近视手术后,术中像差仪、Barrett True-K(含与不含后角膜测量值)、Shammas-PL 和 Haigis-L 公式的准确性。
J Refract Surg. 2021 Jan 1;37(1):60-68. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20201030-02.
10
IOL Power Calculation After Radial Keratotomy Using the Haigis and Barrett True-K Formulas.放射状角膜切开术后的 IOL 功率计算:使用 Haigis 和 Barrett True-K 公式。
J Refract Surg. 2020 Dec 1;36(12):832-837. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200930-02.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the interchangeability of keratometry measurements from four biometric devices in intraocular lens power calculations: insights into the predictive accuracy of five modern IOL formulas.评估四种生物测量设备的角膜曲率测量值在人工晶状体屈光力计算中的互换性:对五种现代人工晶状体公式预测准确性的见解。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 22;25(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04067-y.
2
A Retrospective Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Three Biometers in Short, Medium, and Long Eyes.一项比较三种生物测量仪对短眼、中等眼和长眼预测准确性的回顾性试验。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 17;19:577-583. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S487889. eCollection 2025.
3
Randomized Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Two Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometers.
比较两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪预测准确性的随机试验
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 17;17:2423-2428. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S407538. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparing Predictive Accuracy of a Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and an Optical Low Coherence Reflectometry Biometer.比较扫频源光学相干断层扫描生物测量仪和光学低相干反射测量生物测量仪的预测准确性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul 25;17:2125-2131. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S421504. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparative Visual Outcome Analysis of a Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lens and a New Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus.衍射多焦点人工晶状体与新型扩展焦深衍射多焦点晶状体的视觉效果对比分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 12;11(24):7374. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247374.
6
Comparison of Astigmatism Prediction Accuracy for Toric Lens Implantation from Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Devices.两种扫频源光学相干断层扫描设备用于散光人工晶状体植入散光预测准确性的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov 17;16:3795-3802. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S378019. eCollection 2022.