Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine University of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0250234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250234. eCollection 2021.
To investigate the effect of influenza vaccination with or without probiotic supplementation on the immune response and incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) in the elderly.
A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a modified factorial design was conducted in 554 healthy elderly subjects aged 67 ± 5.6 (ranging from 60-90) years old in the Primary Health Care Center (Puskesmas area) of the Pulo Gadung District East Jakarta. Subjects received either a trivalent influenza vaccine or placebo at the start of the study, and a probiotic supplement (Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011) or a placebo for 6 months. Subjects were randomly assigned into four intervention groups: influenza vaccine and probiotics (n = 141), influenza vaccine and placebo (n = 136), placebo and probiotics (n = 140), and both placebo (n = 137). The primary outcome was ILI incidence within 6 months. The secondary outcomes were seroprotection and seroconversion rates at 1, 4, and 6 months after administering the interventions.
This study showed that the trivalent influenza vaccine increased seroprotection (RR 3.6 [95%CI 2.92-4.47]; p<0.010) and seroconversion (RR 29.8 [95%CI 11.1-79.5]; p<0.010) rates 1 month after vaccination in elderly people while the probiotic supplement did not alter influenza antibody titers (p = 1.000 and p = 0.210). The relative ILI incidence risk was similar between vaccinated and non-vaccinated groups, as well as in the probiotic group compared to the non-probiotic group.
The tested trivalent influenza vaccine significantly induced seroprotection and seroconversion in the vaccinated subjects, while probiotics administration did not influence these parameters. Vaccinated individuals displayed a similarly low ILI incidence as those in the Control Group. However, the observed trend towards a reduction of ILI incidence with probiotics supplementation warrants further assessments in a larger, at-risk population.
NCT03695432.
研究流感疫苗联合或不联合益生菌补充剂对老年人免疫应答和流感样疾病(ILI)发病率的影响。
在雅加达东部普洛加东区普卢戈加通初级保健中心(Puskesmas 地区)进行了一项 554 名健康老年人(年龄 67 ± 5.6 岁,范围为 60-90 岁)的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、改良析因设计试验。研究开始时,受试者接受三价流感疫苗或安慰剂,并接受益生菌补充剂(瑞士乳杆菌 R0052 和鼠李糖乳杆菌 R0011)或安慰剂 6 个月。受试者被随机分为四组干预组:流感疫苗和益生菌(n = 141)、流感疫苗和安慰剂(n = 136)、安慰剂和益生菌(n = 140)和两者均为安慰剂(n = 137)。主要结局为 6 个月内 ILI 发病率。次要结局为干预后 1、4 和 6 个月的血清保护率和血清转化率。
本研究表明,三价流感疫苗可提高老年人接种后 1 个月的血清保护率(RR 3.6 [95%CI 2.92-4.47];p<0.010)和血清转化率(RR 29.8 [95%CI 11.1-79.5];p<0.010),而益生菌补充剂并未改变流感抗体滴度(p = 1.000 和 p = 0.210)。与未接种疫苗组相比,接种疫苗组和未接种疫苗组以及益生菌组和非益生菌组的相对 ILI 发病率风险相似。
本研究测试的三价流感疫苗可显著诱导接种者产生血清保护和血清转化,而益生菌的使用则不会影响这些参数。接种疫苗的个体的 ILI 发病率与对照组相似。然而,益生菌补充剂降低 ILI 发病率的趋势值得在更大的高危人群中进一步评估。
NCT03695432。