Department of Human Nutrition and Hospitality Management, College of Human Environmental Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487 USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, 01003 USA.
Nutr Res. 2022 Jan;97:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
Depression affects 8% of adults in America and is one of the leading causes of disability in Western countries. The dietary inflammatory index (DII) has previously been reported to be associated with inflammation and depression. However, no study to date has looked at the potential mediating effect of inflammation on the association of DII and depression. We hypothesized that the association of DII and depression would be both statistically and clinically mediated substantially by inflammation. We assessed these associations using the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2010 database. Our analysis included 10,022 participants aged 20 years and older. Inflammation was assessed with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Diet was measured using two 24 hour dietary recalls. Depression was assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), which has a score range of 0 to 27, with the higher score showing more severe depressive symptoms. Comparing the highest to lowest DII quartiles, the mean score difference for depression was 0.47 units (95% CI 0.24-0.70, P-trend <.001) in the multivariable adjusted model. In the sex-stratified models, the results remained significant only among females, with the mean score difference of 0.72 (95% CI 0.34-1.10, P-trend <.001). CRP mediated 3.6% of the association between DII and depression in the total population in the fully adjusted model, which was statistically significant (P-trend <.001) but not clinically significant. No mediation association was found in the sex-stratified models. Further studies are needed to assess the associations with various inflammatory biomarkers in larger and more diverse populations.
抑郁症影响了美国 8%的成年人,是西方国家导致残疾的主要原因之一。饮食炎症指数(DII)先前已被报道与炎症和抑郁症有关。然而,迄今为止尚无研究探讨炎症在 DII 与抑郁症之间的关联中的潜在中介作用。我们假设 DII 和抑郁症之间的关联将在统计学和临床上都受到炎症的实质性介导。我们使用横断面国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)2005-2010 数据库评估了这些关联。我们的分析包括年龄在 20 岁及以上的 10022 名参与者。炎症采用 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平评估。饮食通过两份 24 小时饮食回忆进行测量。抑郁症采用 9 项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)评估,得分范围为 0 至 27,得分越高表示抑郁症状越严重。与 DII 四分位数的最高值和最低值相比,在多变量调整模型中,抑郁的平均评分差异为 0.47 个单位(95%CI 0.24-0.70,P-trend <.001)。在性别分层模型中,仅在女性中结果仍然显著,平均评分差异为 0.72(95%CI 0.34-1.10,P-trend <.001)。在完全调整模型中,CRP 介导了 DII 和抑郁症之间总人群中 3.6%的关联,这在统计学上具有显著意义(P-trend <.001),但在临床上没有显著意义。在性别分层模型中未发现中介关联。需要进一步研究以评估在更大、更多样化的人群中与各种炎症生物标志物的关联。