• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,硅酸钙基根管封闭剂在人牙龈成纤维细胞中的细胞毒性和矿化活性

Cytotoxicity and Mineralization Activity of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer in Human Gingival Fibroblast Cells.

作者信息

Shokrzadeh Mohammad, Motafeghi Farzaneh Sadat, Lotfizadeh Anahita, Ghorbani Mohammad, Haddadi Kohsar Azam

机构信息

Department of Toxicology-Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Faculty of Dentistry, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2023 May 31;2023:4376579. doi: 10.1155/2023/4376579. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/4376579
PMID:37293576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10247329/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Root canal obturation is performed by gutta-percha cones and sealer. Therefore, these materials, specially sealers, must be biocompatible. This study investigated the cytotoxicity and mineralization activity of two calcium silicate-based sealers (Endoseal MTA and Ceraseal) and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH26).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this experiment, the cytotoxicity of Endoseal MTA, Ceraseal, and AH26 on human gingival fibroblast cells was examined using Methyl-Thiazol-Tetrazolium assay at time intervals of 24, 48, 72, and 120 hr. The mineralization activity of sealers was evaluated by Alizarin red staining assay. Prism, ver.3, software was used to perform statistical tests. One-way analysis of variance analysis, followed by Tukey's test, was used to determine the group differences. -values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Cytotoxicity of sealers decreased gradually ( < 0.0001). AH26 showed the highest level of cytotoxicity ( < 0.001). In terms of cytotoxicity, no considerable differences were observed between the two-calcium silicate-based sealers ( > 0.05). AH26 showed the lowest mineralization activity ( < 0.0001). Among the calcium silicate-based sealers, mineralization and formation of calcium nodules were more frequently observed in the Endoseal MTA group ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The examined calcium silicate-based sealers had less cytotoxicity and higher mineralization activity than the resin-based sealer (AH26). There was negligible difference between the cytotoxicity of the two-calcium silicate-based, but the cell mineralization caused by Endoseal MTA was higher.

摘要

背景

根管充填是通过牙胶尖和封闭剂来完成的。因此,这些材料,尤其是封闭剂,必须具有生物相容性。本研究调查了两种硅酸钙基封闭剂(Endoseal MTA和Ceraseal)和一种环氧树脂基封闭剂(AH26)的细胞毒性和矿化活性。

材料与方法

在本实验中,使用甲基噻唑四唑盐比色法在24、48、72和120小时的时间间隔内检测Endoseal MTA、Ceraseal和AH26对人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性。通过茜素红染色法评估封闭剂的矿化活性。使用Prism 3软件进行统计测试。采用单因素方差分析,随后进行Tukey检验,以确定组间差异。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

封闭剂的细胞毒性逐渐降低(P<0.0001)。AH26表现出最高水平的细胞毒性(P<0.001)。在细胞毒性方面,两种硅酸钙基封闭剂之间未观察到显著差异(P>0.05)。AH26表现出最低的矿化活性(P<0.0001)。在硅酸钙基封闭剂中,Endoseal MTA组更频繁地观察到矿化和钙结节的形成(P<0.001)。

结论

所检测的硅酸钙基封闭剂比树脂基封闭剂(AH26)具有更低的细胞毒性和更高的矿化活性。两种硅酸钙基封闭剂的细胞毒性之间差异可忽略不计,但Endoseal MTA引起的细胞矿化更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143b/10247329/649663619e7e/IJD2023-4376579.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143b/10247329/796d4b25a005/IJD2023-4376579.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143b/10247329/649663619e7e/IJD2023-4376579.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143b/10247329/796d4b25a005/IJD2023-4376579.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/143b/10247329/649663619e7e/IJD2023-4376579.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Cytotoxicity and Mineralization Activity of Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer in Human Gingival Fibroblast Cells.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,硅酸钙基根管封闭剂在人牙龈成纤维细胞中的细胞毒性和矿化活性
Int J Dent. 2023 May 31;2023:4376579. doi: 10.1155/2023/4376579. eCollection 2023.
2
Biocompatibility and Mineralization Activity of Three Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealers Compared to Conventional Resin-Based Sealer in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.与传统树脂基封闭剂相比,三种硅酸钙基根管封闭剂在人牙髓干细胞中的生物相容性和矿化活性
Materials (Basel). 2019 Aug 5;12(15):2482. doi: 10.3390/ma12152482.
3
Cytocompatibility, bioactivity potential, and ion release of three premixed calcium silicate-based sealers.三种混合钙硅酸钠基密封剂的细胞相容性、生物活性潜力和离子释放。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 May;24(5):1749-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03036-2. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
4
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic-based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study.评价基于生物陶瓷的封闭剂在椭圆形根管中的界面适应性和渗透性:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Microsc Res Tech. 2023 Jul;86(7):754-761. doi: 10.1002/jemt.24323. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
6
Ability of Calcium Silicate and Epoxy Resin-based Sealers to Fill the Artificial Lateral Canals in the Presence or Absence of Smear Layer.硅酸钙和环氧树脂类封闭剂在有或无玷污层情况下填充人工侧支根管的能力。
Maedica (Bucur). 2021 Sep;16(3):458-462. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2021.16.3.458.
7
Methodological proposal for evaluation of adhesion of root canal sealers to gutta-percha.根管封闭剂与牙胶黏附性评价方法的研究进展。
Int Endod J. 2021 Sep;54(9):1653-1658. doi: 10.1111/iej.13549. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of newly developed calcium silicate-based sealers.新开发的硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理化学性质及细胞相容性
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):512-519. doi: 10.1111/aej.12515. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
9
Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments.四种不同根管器械对 3 种含硅酸钙类根管封闭剂和 1 种环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的可取出性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2156-5. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.硅酸钙基封闭剂与环氧树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞生物相容性的比较
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;13(22):5242. doi: 10.3390/ma13225242.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative analysis of the inflammatory response of human gingival fibroblasts to NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study.人牙龈成纤维细胞对NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal生物陶瓷封闭剂炎症反应的比较分析:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05692-1.
2
Mechanisms of ARA290 in counteracting cadmium-triggered neurotoxicity in PC12 cells.ARA290在对抗镉引发的PC12细胞神经毒性中的作用机制。
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2025 Feb 17;14(1):tfaf023. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaf023. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
A three-dimensional cell culture approach to investigate cytotoxic effects and production of inflammatory mediators by epoxy resin-based and calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer.

本文引用的文献

1
Physico-chemical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers in powder/liquid and ready-to-use forms.钙硅基水门汀粉液调和及成品两种剂型的理化性能。
Braz Dent J. 2022 Sep-Oct;33(5):18-25. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204832.
2
A comprehensive in vitro comparison of the biological and physicochemical properties of bioactive root canal sealers.一种生物活性根管封闭剂的生物学和理化性能的全面体外比较。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Oct;26(10):6209-6222. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04570-2. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Dental Pulp Fibroblast: A Star Cell.
采用三维细胞培养方法研究基于环氧树脂和基于硅酸钙的根管封闭剂的细胞毒性作用和炎症介质的产生。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 May 29;28(6):344. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05743-x.
4
Comparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCs.新型 Bioroot Flow 和 AH Plus Bioceramic 根管封闭剂的比较生物活性和免疫调节潜力:对人牙周膜干细胞的体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Mar 5;28(3):195. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05593-7.
5
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
6
Advances and challenges in regenerative dentistry: A systematic review of calcium phosphate and silicate-based materials on human dental pulp stem cells.再生牙科的进展与挑战:关于磷酸钙和硅酸盐基材料对人牙髓干细胞作用的系统评价
Mater Today Bio. 2023 Sep 23;23:100815. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100815. eCollection 2023 Dec.
牙髓成纤维细胞:明星细胞。
J Endod. 2022 Aug;48(8):1005-1019. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 14.
4
The Retrievability of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer during Retreatment and the Effectiveness of Additional Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation: A Microcomputed Tomographic Study.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在再治疗期间的可取出性和额外被动超声冲洗的有效性:一项微计算机断层扫描研究。
Scanning. 2022 Jan 24;2022:3933305. doi: 10.1155/2022/3933305. eCollection 2022.
5
biocompatibility and bioactivity of calcium silicate‑based bioceramics in endodontics (Review).钙硅基生物陶瓷在牙髓病学中的生物相容性和生物活性(综述)。
Int J Mol Med. 2021 Jul;48(1). doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2021.4961. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of newly developed calcium silicate-based sealers.新开发的硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理化学性质及细胞相容性
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):512-519. doi: 10.1111/aej.12515. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
7
Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in human gingival fibroblast and ions release of endodontic sealers incorporated with nanostructured silver vanadate.纳米结构钒酸银掺入根管封闭剂对人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性和遗传毒性作用及离子释放。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2021 Sep;109(9):1380-1388. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34798. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Subcutaneous Implantation Assessment of New Calcium-Silicate Based Sealer for Warm Obturation.新型硅酸钙基热牙胶充填封闭剂皮下植入评估
Biomedicines. 2021 Jan 1;9(1):24. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9010024.
9
Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.硅酸钙基封闭剂与环氧树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞生物相容性的比较
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;13(22):5242. doi: 10.3390/ma13225242.
10
Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers: a literature review.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂:文献综述
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Jun 9;45(3):e35. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e35. eCollection 2020 Aug.