Angerame Daniele, De Biasi Matteo, Porrelli Davide, Bevilacqua Lorenzo, Zanin Riccardo, Olivi Matteo, Kaitsas Vassilios, Olivi Giovanni
University Clinical Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Private Practice, Rome, Italy.
Aust Endod J. 2022 Dec;48(3):415-422. doi: 10.1111/aej.12603. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
This study analysed the bioceramic sealer cleaning ability of two chemo-mechanical systems in intact and restored teeth. Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were used, and half of them restored with a pre-endodontic composite restoration (PCR). All samples were instrumented with a size 40 Reciproc Blue file and filled with BioRoot RCS. Canals were retreated using the R40 and then R50 Reciproc Blue. The samples were divided into four experimental groups (n = 8): intact teeth/passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) (G1), intact teeth/shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) (G2), PCR/PUI (G3) and PCR/SWEEPS (G4). The samples were scanned by micro-CT before and after retreatment, and the volume of remaining filling material was evaluated. The minor percentage of residues were observed in G2, with a volume of 0.447 ± 0.356% of the endodontic space (P < 0.001). The Reciproc/SWEEPS technique showed the better performance in intact teeth compared with PUI technique. Pre-endodontic restoration did not significantly affect the effectiveness of sealer removal.
本研究分析了两种化学机械系统对完整牙齿和修复后牙齿的生物陶瓷封闭剂清洁能力。使用了32颗单根牙,其中一半用根管治疗前复合树脂修复(PCR)进行修复。所有样本均使用40号Reciproc Blue锉进行预备,并充填BioRoot RCS。根管先用R40 Reciproc Blue再用R50 Reciproc Blue进行再治疗。样本分为四个实验组(n = 8):完整牙齿/被动超声冲洗(PUI)(G1)、完整牙齿/冲击波增强发射光声流(SWEEPS)(G2)、PCR/PUI(G3)和PCR/SWEEPS(G4)。再治疗前后通过显微CT对样本进行扫描,并评估剩余充填材料的体积。在G2组中观察到的残余物百分比最小,占根管空间的0.447±0.356%(P < 0.001)。与PUI技术相比,Reciproc/SWEEPS技术在完整牙齿中表现出更好的性能。根管治疗前的修复对封闭剂去除效果没有显著影响。