Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术联合与不联合胃切除术治疗重度肥胖患者的结局:随机对照试验的证据。

Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with and without antrectomy in severely obese subjects. Evidence from randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida.

Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida.

出版信息

Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Mar;18(3):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.11.016. Epub 2021 Nov 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has been proven safe and effective in achieving weight loss. However, the distance from the pylorus where resection should begin has been debated.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic SG with antrum resection (AR) versus preservation (AP) for bariatric purposes by conducting a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).

SETTING

Academic hospital, United States.

METHODS

PubMed and Cochrane Library were queried for RCTs from establishment to August 2020. The following key search terms were used: "sleeve gastrectomy" AND ("antrectomy" OR "antrum") AND ("randomized" OR "random"). The following data were extracted: author, publication year, country, sample size, follow-up duration, and clinical outcomes, including weight-related: excess weight loss (EWL), total weight loss (TWL), body mass index (BMI), operation time, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 9 unique RCTs including 492 AR and 385 AP patients were screened and included in the final quantitative analysis. Patients who underwent SG with AR showed higher EWL and TWL at 6 months (EWL: P < .001; TWL: P = .006), and 1 year (EWL: P = .013; P < .001) postoperatively. The BMI was also lower in the AR group 3 months (P = .013) and 6 months (P = .003) postoperatively. However, the EWL and BMI at 2 years were comparable between both groups (P = .222 and P = .908, respectively). No statistical significance was observed in terms of operating time, staple line disruption, bleeding, complications with a Clavien-Dindo Grade >III, resolution of comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, arthritis/back pain), and de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (P > .05). AP was associated with a slightly shorter postoperative hospital stay (4.0 versus 3.1 days, P = .039).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic SG with AR is associated with superior weight loss in the short-term compared with AP. However, mid-term follow-up beyond 1 year showed no significant differences in BMI or incidence of de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(SG)已被证明在减重方面是安全有效的。然而,切除起始部位的幽门距离一直存在争议。

目的

通过对随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,比较腹腔镜 SG 行胃窦切除术(AR)与保留术(AP)用于减重的临床效果。

设置

美国学术医院。

方法

从建立到 2020 年 8 月,在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆中检索 RCT,使用以下关键搜索词:“袖状胃切除术”和“胃窦切除术”或“胃窦”和“随机”或“随机”。提取以下数据:作者、出版年份、国家、样本量、随访时间和临床结果,包括体重相关:多余体重减轻(EWL)、总体重减轻(TWL)、体重指数(BMI)、手术时间、住院时间、并发症发生率以及肥胖相关合并症的解决情况。

结果

共筛选出 9 项独特的 RCT,包括 492 例 AR 和 385 例 AP 患者,纳入最终的定量分析。行 SG 加 AR 的患者在术后 6 个月(EWL:P <.001;TWL:P =.006)和 1 年(EWL:P =.013;P <.001)时 EWL 和 TWL 更高。AR 组术后 3 个月(P =.013)和 6 个月(P =.003)BMI 也较低。然而,两组在 2 年时 EWL 和 BMI 相当(P =.222 和 P =.908)。在手术时间、吻合线破裂、出血、Clavien-Dindo 分级 >III 级并发症、合并症的解决(高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症、关节炎/背痛)和新发胃食管反流病(P >.05)方面无统计学意义。AP 术后住院时间略短(4.0 天比 3.1 天,P =.039)。

结论

与 AP 相比,腹腔镜 SG 加 AR 在短期内与体重减轻相关,与 AP 相比,腹腔镜 SG 加 AR 在短期内与体重减轻相关。然而,1 年以上的中期随访显示 BMI 或新发胃食管反流病的发生率无显著差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验