• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期安全:参与、整合、赋能、维持以消除患者安全事件。

Perioperative Safety: Engage, Integrate, Empower, Sustain to Eliminate Patient Safety Events.

作者信息

Falcone Richard A, Simmons Jeffrey, Carver Amanda M, Mullett Brooke, Kotagal Meera, Lin Erica, Muething Stephen, von Allmen Daniel

机构信息

Surgical Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

The Anderson Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Dec 15;6(6):e495. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000495. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.

DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000495
PMID:34934878
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8677994/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The perioperative environment is one of the most complex areas within a hospital with significant safety risks. Despite a long history of safety-focused work, a recent cluster of patient safety events prompted a renewed comprehensive approach to improve safety processes and transform culture.

METHODS

Our team comprehensively approached perioperative safety through integration across traditional silos and a focus on institutional safety culture. This approach consisted of a careful review of all events, developing Perioperative Safety Coordinating and Education teams, testing and implementing new/revised safety processes, and an ongoing evaluation plan.

RESULTS

Updates to our Perioperative Safety Mission and Tenets and the development of an empowered Safety Culture Champion team composed of a diverse group of frontline team members addressed our safety culture. In addition, key safety processes (time-outs, intraoperative huddles, and prevention of retained foreign bodies) were revised and implemented. Observation of key safety processes demonstrates a 90% compliance, which includes all steps and team engagement. After implementation, a span of 377 days between events was accomplished, which is significantly higher than the 33 days between events during our cluster.

CONCLUSIONS

This work builds upon prior incremental improvements through a comprehensive investment in not only improving key processes but transforming the safety culture. Acceptable deviance from the standard process is no longer the norm. Instead, an approach that emphasizes understanding, integration, engagement, and accountability for safety by each team member for every patient, every time, every day, has been implemented.

摘要

未标注

围手术期环境是医院内最复杂的区域之一,存在重大安全风险。尽管长期以来一直致力于安全工作,但最近一系列患者安全事件促使采取新的全面方法来改进安全流程并转变文化。

方法

我们的团队通过跨越传统部门进行整合并关注机构安全文化,全面处理围手术期安全问题。该方法包括仔细审查所有事件、组建围手术期安全协调与教育团队、测试和实施新的/修订后的安全流程以及持续的评估计划。

结果

更新我们的围手术期安全使命和原则,并组建由不同一线团队成员组成的有权力的安全文化倡导团队,解决了我们的安全文化问题。此外,关键安全流程(手术暂停、术中碰头会以及预防异物残留)得到修订并实施。对关键安全流程的观察显示合规率达到90%,包括所有步骤和团队参与情况。实施后,事件间隔达到377天,显著高于我们事件群期间的33天。

结论

这项工作在之前渐进式改进的基础上,不仅对关键流程进行了全面投资,还对安全文化进行了转变。不再以偏离标准流程的可接受偏差为常态。相反,实施了一种强调每个团队成员在每次、每天、为每位患者的安全理解、整合、参与和问责的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/c047c70f9821/pqs-6-e495-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/617dc6deb83d/pqs-6-e495-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/4df52b41d9cc/pqs-6-e495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/6e1a3e361ff2/pqs-6-e495-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/c047c70f9821/pqs-6-e495-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/617dc6deb83d/pqs-6-e495-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/4df52b41d9cc/pqs-6-e495-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/6e1a3e361ff2/pqs-6-e495-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f3a/8677994/c047c70f9821/pqs-6-e495-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Perioperative Safety: Engage, Integrate, Empower, Sustain to Eliminate Patient Safety Events.围手术期安全:参与、整合、赋能、维持以消除患者安全事件。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2021 Dec 15;6(6):e495. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000495. eCollection 2021 Nov-Dec.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Quality and Patient Safety Teams in the Perioperative Setting.
AORN J. 2015 Dec;102(6):617-28. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2015.10.006.
4
Improving the implementation of perioperative safety guidelines using a multifaceted intervention approach: protocol of the IMPROVE study, a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.采用多方面干预方法改善围手术期安全指南的实施:IMPROVE研究方案,一项阶梯楔形整群随机试验
Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 8;10:3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0198-5.
5
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
7
Training teams for the perioperative environment: a research agenda.围手术期环境培训团队:一项研究议程。
Surg Innov. 2006 Sep;13(3):170-8. doi: 10.1177/1553350606294248.
8
Good Catch Campaign: Improving the Perioperative Culture of Safety.良好捕捉行动:改善围手术期安全文化。
AORN J. 2018 Jun;107(6):705-714. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12148.
9
[Safety-II in daily clinical practice].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2021 May;162:10-15. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2021.02.003. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
10
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions and impact of pharmacist-delivered services in perioperative setting on clinically important outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.围手术期药剂师提供的服务对临床重要结局的干预及影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Jul 31;15:20420986241260169. doi: 10.1177/20420986241260169. eCollection 2024.
2
Effect of pharmacist care on clinical outcomes and therapy optimization in perioperative settings: A systematic review.药剂师护理对围手术期临床结局及治疗优化的影响:一项系统评价
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024 Dec 16;82(1):44-73. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxae177.
3
Perioperative capacity and contextual challenges in teaching hospitals of southern Ethiopia: explanatory sequential mixed-methods research.

本文引用的文献

1
Standardizing Preoperative Evaluation for Pediatric Central Venous Access: A Care Algorithm to Improve Safety.标准化小儿中央静脉通路术前评估:提高安全性的护理算法。
J Infus Nurs. 2020 Sep/Oct;43(5):262-274. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000386.
2
Implementing a "visualize and verify" process for the surgical sponge count.对外科手术纱布清点实施“可视化并核实”流程。
AORN J. 2020 Feb;111(2):P11-P13. doi: 10.1002/aorn.12971.
3
Don't Get Stuck: A Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Perioperative Blood-Borne Pathogen Exposure.别陷入困境:一项旨在减少围手术期血源性病原体暴露的质量改进项目。
埃塞俄比亚南部教学医院的围手术期能力与背景挑战:解释性序列混合方法研究
Perioper Med (Lond). 2024 Jun 22;13(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13741-024-00423-6.
4
Measuring the Interprofessional Health of the Pediatric Cardiovascular Operating Room Work Environment.衡量小儿心血管手术室工作环境的跨专业健康状况。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2024 Jun 11;9(3):e737. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000737. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
5
Perioperative Environment Safety Culture: A Scoping Review Addressing Safety Culture, Climate, Enacting Behaviors, and Enabling Factors.围手术期环境安全文化:一项针对安全文化、氛围、实施行为和促成因素的范围综述。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2023 Dec;41(4):755-773. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2023.06.004. Epub 2023 Aug 8.
6
Mitigating the Isolation of Minoritized Faculty in Academic Medicine.缓解学术医学中少数族裔教职员工的孤立现象。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1751-1755. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07982-8. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019 May;45(5):329-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
4
Improving transitions of care between the operating room and intensive care unit.改善手术室与重症监护病房之间的护理转接。
Transl Pediatr. 2018 Oct;7(4):299-307. doi: 10.21037/tp.2018.09.09.
5
Factors Affecting Adherence to a Preoperative Surgical Site Infection Prevention Protocol.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;37(6):728-30. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.42. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
6
Using improvement science methods to increase accuracy of surgical consents.
AORN J. 2014 Jul;100(1):42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.07.023.
7
Improving situation awareness to reduce unrecognized clinical deterioration and serious safety events.提高情景意识,减少未被识别的临床恶化和严重安全事件。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):e298-308. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1364. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
8
Quality improvement initiative to reduce serious safety events and improve patient safety culture.质量改进计划,以减少严重安全事件并改善患者安全文化。
Pediatrics. 2012 Aug;130(2):e423-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-3566. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
9
Reducing surgical site infections at a pediatric academic medical center.降低儿科学术医疗中心的手术部位感染率
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Apr;35(4):192-8. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35026-6.
10
The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review.住院不良事件的发生率及性质:一项系统综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Jun;17(3):216-23. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622.