• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用对话模式为口腔保健制定研究议程——患者与从业者共同参与制定研究议程。

Establishing the research agenda for oral healthcare using the Dialogue Model-patient involvement in a joint research agenda with practitioners.

机构信息

Oral Public Health Department, ACTA, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Oral Sci. 2022 Feb;130(1):e12842. doi: 10.1111/eos.12842. Epub 2021 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1111/eos.12842
PMID:34935209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9305769/
Abstract

Engagement of patients in the composition of a research agenda is essential to reduce the gap between research and practice and thereby generate more impact. The aim of this study was to develop a research agenda for oral health. Experienced challenges and needs with oral health(care) of practitioners and patients formed the input for the research agenda. We describe the identification of research priorities of patients and the integration of these with previously identified research priorities of practitioners, using a participatory multi-phase approach for research agenda setting (Dialogue Model). Via focus group discussions, 32 research topics were generated. Next, 1495 patients prioritized these topics in an online survey. In a dialogue meeting, a joint research agenda of eight research topics was agreed upon. Many topics were contributed by patients, but were prioritized by both stakeholder groups. The most important topics concerned behavior change and the relation between general and oral health. Other topics that were prioritized covered affordability and accessibility as well as health system research and organizational issues. By considering different perspectives, this research agenda has uncovered directions for future research that go beyond evident research topics, as many topics are currently underrepresented in oral healthcare research.

摘要

让患者参与研究议程的制定对于缩小研究与实践之间的差距、从而产生更大的影响至关重要。本研究旨在制定口腔健康研究议程。参与者在口腔健康(保健)方面的经验挑战和需求为研究议程提供了依据。我们描述了患者研究重点的确定,并使用参与式多阶段研究议程制定方法(对话模式)将这些重点与之前确定的从业者研究重点结合起来。通过焦点小组讨论,产生了 32 个研究课题。接下来,1495 名患者在在线调查中对这些课题进行了优先级排序。在一次对话会议上,双方同意了八项研究课题的联合研究议程。许多课题是由患者提出的,但也被两个利益相关群体列为优先事项。最重要的课题涉及行为改变以及一般健康和口腔健康之间的关系。其他被优先考虑的课题包括可负担性和可及性,以及卫生系统研究和组织问题。通过考虑不同的观点,本研究议程揭示了未来研究的方向,超越了明显的研究课题,因为目前许多课题在口腔保健研究中代表性不足。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/308c/9305769/fab460d3de9d/EOS-130-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/308c/9305769/fab460d3de9d/EOS-130-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/308c/9305769/fab460d3de9d/EOS-130-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Establishing the research agenda for oral healthcare using the Dialogue Model-patient involvement in a joint research agenda with practitioners.利用对话模式为口腔保健制定研究议程——患者与从业者共同参与制定研究议程。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2022 Feb;130(1):e12842. doi: 10.1111/eos.12842. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
2
A research agenda on oral health care as a boundary object that unites the perspectives of patients and practitioners.一项将口腔保健作为统一患者和从业者观点的边界对象的研究议程。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1701-1712. doi: 10.1111/hex.13310. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
Mental health research priorities in Australia: a consumer and carer agenda.澳大利亚精神健康研究重点:以消费者和照顾者为中心的议程。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Dec 12;16(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0395-9.
4
Research priorities for oral healthcare: agenda setting from the practitioners' perspective.口腔保健研究重点:从从业者的角度制定议程。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2021 Aug;79(6):451-457. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1887929. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Patient involvement in research programming and implementation: A responsive evaluation of the Dialogue Model for research agenda setting.患者参与研究规划与实施:对研究议程设定对话模型的响应性评估
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2449-64. doi: 10.1111/hex.12213. Epub 2014 May 30.
6
Research priorities of patients with neuromuscular disease.神经肌肉疾病患者的研究重点。
Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Mar;35(5):405-12. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.694964. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
7
What matters most to patients about primary healthcare: mixed-methods patient priority setting exercises within the PREFeR (PRioritiEs For Research) project.患者对初级医疗保健最关心的是什么:在 PREFeR(研究优先事项)项目中使用混合方法进行患者优先事项设定练习。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e025954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025954.
8
Palliative care research in Africa: consensus building for a prioritized agenda.非洲的姑息治疗研究:为优先议程建立共识
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):315-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.022. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
9
Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet).让利益相关者参与制定以患者为中心的研究议程:从健康网络研究行动(REACHnet)中吸取的经验教训。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000785.
10
Patient participation as dialogue: setting research agendas.患者参与作为对话:设定研究议程。
Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00549.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence and consequences of academic drift in the field of dental research: A bibliometric analysis 2000-2015.牙科研究领域学术漂移的证据与后果:一项2000 - 2015年的文献计量分析
BDJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;8(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41405-022-00093-w.
2
A research agenda on oral health care as a boundary object that unites the perspectives of patients and practitioners.一项将口腔保健作为统一患者和从业者观点的边界对象的研究议程。
Health Expect. 2021 Oct;24(5):1701-1712. doi: 10.1111/hex.13310. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
3
The WHO global strategy for oral health: an opportunity for bold action.
世界卫生组织全球口腔健康战略:大胆行动的契机。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 17;398(10296):192-194. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01404-5. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Research priorities for oral healthcare: agenda setting from the practitioners' perspective.口腔保健研究重点:从从业者的角度制定议程。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2021 Aug;79(6):451-457. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1887929. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Oral Health Series: Implications for Oral and Dental Research.口腔健康系列:对口腔及牙科研究的启示
J Dent Res. 2020 Jan;99(1):8-10. doi: 10.1177/0022034519889050.
6
The funding sources of implantology research in the period 2008-2017: A bibliometric analysis.2008-2017 年种植学研究的资金来源:文献计量分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):708-714. doi: 10.1111/cid.12810. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
7
How well are dental qualitative studies involving interviews and focus groups reported?涉及访谈和焦点小组的口腔定性研究报告得如何?
J Dent. 2019 May;84:44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 9.
8
Patients', clinicians' and the research communities' priorities for treatment research: there is an important mismatch.患者、临床医生和研究团体在治疗研究方面的优先事项:存在重大不匹配。
Res Involv Engagem. 2015 Jun 25;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-015-0003-x. eCollection 2015.
9
Periodontitis: a global disease and the primary care provider's role.牙周炎:一种全球性疾病及初级保健提供者的作用
Postgrad Med J. 2017 Sep;93(1103):560-565. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-134801. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Evidence summary: the relationship between oral health and pulmonary disease.证据总结:口腔健康与肺部疾病之间的关系
Br Dent J. 2017 Apr 7;222(7):527-533. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.315.