Suppr超能文献

门诊牙科手术的单次静脉麻醉。2,6-二异丙基苯酚与美索比妥的比较。

Single-shot i.v. anaesthesia for outpatient dental surgery. Comparison of 2,6 di-isopropyl phenol and methohexitone.

作者信息

Logan M R, Duggan J E, Levack I D, Spence A A

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1987 Feb;59(2):179-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.2.179.

Abstract

A single i.v. bolus dose of propofol 3 mg kg-1 was compared with methohexitone 2 mg kg-1 as the sole anaesthetic agent for simple dental extraction in outpatients. Induction of anaesthesia was smoother with propofol, with a lower incidence of excitatory phenomena. Pain on injection was a common complication of both drugs and related to the site of injection. The Leeds Psychomotor Tester was used to assess psychomotor performance during the recovery. Rate of recovery from anaesthesia was similar with both agents, and there was little residual impairment of psychomotor function 40 min after induction.

摘要

将丙泊酚3 mg·kg⁻¹单次静脉推注剂量与甲己炔巴比妥2 mg·kg⁻¹作为门诊患者简单拔牙的唯一麻醉剂进行比较。丙泊酚诱导麻醉更平稳,兴奋现象发生率更低。注射疼痛是两种药物的常见并发症,且与注射部位有关。使用利兹精神运动测试仪评估恢复期间的精神运动表现。两种药物的麻醉恢复率相似,诱导后40分钟精神运动功能几乎没有残留损害。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验